scholarly journals Spectral and thermal responses of peanut to infection and colonization with Athelia rolfsii

Author(s):  
Xing Wei ◽  
David Langston ◽  
Hillary Laureen Mehl

Soilborne fungal diseases, including southern stem rot (SSR, causal agent Athelia rolfsii), are major constraints to peanut production worldwide. Scouting for disease via visual observation is time and labor-intensive, but sensor technologies are a promising tool for plant disease detection. Prior research has focused on foliar diseases, and few studies have applied sensor-based tools for early detection of soilborne diseases. This study characterized the temporal progress of spectral and thermal responses of peanut plants during infection and colonization with A. rolfsii under controlled environment. In greenhouse experiments, A. rolfsii-inoculated and mock-inoculated lateral stems of peanut were inspected daily for symptoms, and leaf spectral reflectance and temperature were measured using a handheld spectrometer and thermal camera, respectively. Following onset of visual disease symptoms, leaflets on inoculated stems had greater spectral reflectance in the visible region compared to those on mock-inoculated stems. Leaflets on the inoculated stems also had greater normalized leaf temperatures as compared to leaflets on mock-inoculated stems. Overall, results indicate that signatures of disease development can be detected during peanut infection and colonization with A. rolfsii using spectral reflectance and thermal imaging technologies, and spectral signatures of disease are more consistent and specific compared to thermal ones. Though only one peanut variety, one pathogen isolate, and one single measurement were assessed per evaluation date, temporal progress of spectral and thermal responses on a daily basis characterized in this study can be used to develop sensor-based methods to detect southern stem rot and other soilborne diseases ultimately in the field.

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. L. Bowen ◽  
A. K. Hagan ◽  
J. R. Weeks

Abstract Pest levels and yields of peanut were monitored in growers' fields in 1991 through 1993. Yields ranged from 2085 to 6440 kg/ha and averaged 3947 kg/ha over the 3 yr. Incidence of southern stem rot (SSR) (caused by Sclerotium rolfsii) averaged 7.6 foci (up to 30 cm in length) per 30.5 m row and ranged from 0 to 31.0 foci. Peanut yield tended to be inversely related to incidence of SSR and directly related to the number of years between peanut crops. Incidence of SSR was inversely related to number of years between peanut crops and was consistently greater in fields cropped to peanut every other year compared to other fields with less intensive peanut production. Yields obtained from irrigated fields averaged 11.4% greater than those without irrigation. Leaf spot control programs used by growers provided consistent levels of control. Peanut seed invasion by aflatoxigenic fungi and plant damage by larvae of the lesser cornstalk borer (Elasmopalus lignosellus) generally were low. Seed invasion by Aspergillus flavus-type fungi was positively correlated (P < 0.05) with damage due to lesser cornstalk borer in 1993. Juvenile populations of root knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) were positively correlated (P < 0.001) with incidence of SSR in 1992.


2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Woodward ◽  
T. B. Brenneman ◽  
R. C. Kemerait ◽  
A. K. Culbreath ◽  
N. B. Smith

ABSTRACT In 2003, 2004, and 2005 standard and reduced input fungicide programs were evaluated throughout the peanut production region of Georgia for control of early leaf spot (Cercospora arachidicola), late leaf spot (Cercosporidium personatum), and southern stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii). Disease risk was determined for each field based on the cultural practices implemented and ranged from low to high. Six to eight fungicide applications were made in the standard programs, versus three to six applications in reduced programs. Leaf spot ratings were higher for the reduced programs in five of the fourteen trials with substantial defoliation occurring in one trial. Overall, southern stem rot control for the reduced programs was equal to or better than that for the standard program, which could be attributed to the differences in fungicide selection or timing. Pod yields for the reduced programs were equal to or greater than the standard programs in all but one trial. Net returns were higher for the reduced programs in half of the trials; however, the reduced program resulted in lower net returns in one trial in 2004. Our results indicate that reduced input fungicide programs can be used to adequately manage fungal diseases of peanut without compromising yield or profitability, and that the use of cultivars with moderate levels of disease resistance may enhance disease control.


2021 ◽  
pp. 174-196
Author(s):  
Shou-Hua Wang

Abstract This chapter provides information on diagnosis of stem diseases, including disease symptoms, visual and microscopic examination, isolation and colony observation, DNA-based identification, and pathogenicity test. Stem disease management are also discussed. Hemp diseases including hemp southern blight (Athelia rolfsii), hemp charcoal rot (Macrophomina phaseolina), hemp stem canker, stem rot and crown rot (Fusarium), hemp crown rot (Pythium) among others were used as models.


Plant Disease ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Le Bihan ◽  
J. Gaudin ◽  
F. Robledo-Garcia ◽  
P. Cosson ◽  
C. Hastoy ◽  
...  

Plant Disease ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (11) ◽  
pp. 2965-2965
Author(s):  
Yunhee Seo ◽  
Mi-Jeong Park ◽  
Chang-Gi Back ◽  
Jong-Han Park

Plant Disease ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. PDIS-05-20-1086
Author(s):  
D. Kamil ◽  
A. Bahadur ◽  
P. Debnath ◽  
A. Kumari ◽  
S. P. Choudhary ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Sofia Hanafiah ◽  
IRDA SAFNI ◽  
LUTHFI A.M. SIREGAR ◽  
REVANDY I.M. DAMANIK ◽  
ANGGRIA LESTAMI ◽  
...  

Abstract. Hanafiah DS, Safni I, Siregar LAM, Famanik RIM, Lestmi A, Matondang M. 2020. Resistance level of several soybean lines of M6 generation to stem rot disease Athelia rolfsii. Biodiversitas 21: 4537-4542.  Athelia rolfsii (Curzi) C.C. Tu & Kimbr. is a soil-borne pathogen that causes stem rot disease on plants. The attack is one of the causes of low soybean productivity hence induction of plant resistance is needed to overcome these problems. Mutagenesis is one of the breeding techniques for inducing genetic variability especially for disease-resistant characters in soybean. This research aimed to obtain selected soybean plant lines (Glycine max L. Merr) of M6 generation based on resistant character against stem rot disease A. rolfsii. This research was conducted at the Laboratory of Plant Disease and research field of Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia and soybean planting was carried out on agricultural field, Universitas Sumatera Utara from March to September 2018. This research used augmented design. The treatments were 8 mutant genotypes derived from radiation mutagenesis, that is; Anjasmoro, Argomulyo, and Kipas Putih varieties.  The results showed that the analysis of resistant levels on M6 generation based on disease incidence resulted in 2 lines with resistant criteria to stem rot disease A. rolfsii, that is; M100A25 (5/3) and M200A11 (32/3). Observation of intensity of disease attacks showed that Anjasmoro, Argomulyo, M100A6 (31/1), and M200A12 (6/5) had the lowest resistance level compared to other genotypes. The mutant lines that had high category level of resistance are candidates for resistance lines against stem rot disease A. rolfsii.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deeba Kamil ◽  
Amar Bahadur ◽  
Prasenjit Debnath ◽  
Anjali Kumari ◽  
Shiv Pratap Choudhary ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Hagan ◽  
H. L. Campbell ◽  
K. L. Bowen ◽  
L. Wells ◽  
R. Goodman

Abstract Fungicide inputs are a costly but critical component of peanut production systems in the southeast U.S. Current strategies for reducing fungicide application numbers that are needed to control diseases on peanut include extending application intervals beyond a 2-wk schedule or implementation of a fungicide advisory, such as AU-Pnuts. In this study, fungicide programs with azoxystrobin, chlorothalonil, and tebuconazole, using different application schedules, were compared for the control of early leaf spot and stem rot. Application schedules were the standard 2-wk calendar interval, extended 3- and 4-wk intervals, and applications were made according to the AU-Pnuts leaf spot advisory. Studies were conducted on the disease resistant cultivars DP-1 in 2003 and C-99R in 2004 and 2005. The numbers of fungicide applications for the 2, 3, and 4-wk schedules were 7, 5, and 4, respectively, in 2003 and 2004, and were 6, 5, and 4, respectively, in 2005. One less fungicide application was scheduled according to AU-Pnuts than with the 2-wk calendar schedule in all three years, yet final early leaf spot levels with these schedules were similar in 2 of 3 years. With one fewer fungicide application, the 3-wk schedule had higher leaf spot levels than the AU-Pnuts advisory in 2003 and 2004. Further, when application intervals were extended from 2 wk to 3 or 4-wk intervals, a significant increase in early leaf spot was noted in two of three years. Despite these differences in early leaf spot severity, application schedule had limited impact on yield in this study. Application interval also had little impact on stem rot incidence, but incidence of this disease was lower with the azoxystrobin than chlorothalonil programs in 2 of 3 years. The azoxystrobin program significantly increased yield in 2 of 3 years compared with the chlorothalonil or tebuconazole programs. Yield was also higher for the tebuconazole compared with chlorothalonil programs in 2 of 3 years. When fungicide product and application costs were calculated, and those and other typical peanut production costs were deducted from estimated returns based on actual yields, the resulting net returns did not significantly differ among fungicide programs or application schedules.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document