Amis, T. C., N. O’Neill, T. Van der Touw, A. Tully, and A. Brancatisano. Supraglottic airway pressure-flow relationships during oronasal airflow partitioning in dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 81(5): 1958–1964, 1996.—We studied pressure-flow relationships in the supraglottic airway of eight prone mouth-open anesthetized (intravenous chloralose or pentobarbital sodium) crossbred dogs (weight 15–26 kg) during increasing respiratory drive (CO2administration; n = 4) and during graded-voltage electrical stimulation (SV; n = 4) of the soft palate muscles. During increased respiratory drive, inspiratory airflow occurred via both the nose (V˙n) and mouth (V˙m), with the ratio of V˙n toV˙m [%(V˙n/V˙m)] decreasing maximally from 16.0 ± 7.0 (SD) to 2.4 ± 1.6% ( P < 0.05). Simultaneously, oral airway resistance at peak inspiratory flow decreased from 2.1 ± 1.0 to 0.4 ± 0.4 cmH2O ( P < 0.05), whereas nasal airway resistance did not change (14.4 ± 7.2 to 13.1 ± 5.4 cmH2O; P = 0.29). Inspiratory pressure-flow plots of the oral airway were inversely curvilinear or more complex in nature. Nasal pathway plots, however, demonstrated a positive linear relationship in all animals ( r = 0.87 ± 0.11; all P < 0.001). During electrical stimulation of soft palate muscle contraction accompanied by graded constant-inspiratory airflows of 45–385 ml/s through an isolated upper airway, %(V˙n/V˙m) decreased from 69 ± 50 to 10 ± 13% at a SV of 84 ± 3% of maximal SV ( P < 0.001). At a SV of 85 ± 1% of maximum, normalized oral airway resistance (expressed as percent baseline) fell to 5 ± 3%, whereas normalized nasal resistance was 80 ± 9% (both P< 0.03). Thus control of oronasal airflow partitioning in dogs appears mediated more by alterations in oral route geometry than by closure of the nasopharyngeal airway.