The Role of Microvascular Free Soft Tissue Transfer in Reconstructive Surgery

1986 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 399-409
Author(s):  
Rose-May Guignard ◽  
Serge Krupp
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 152
Author(s):  
Parintosa Atmodiwirjo

For more than 5 decades, microvascular surgery has been growing and found its place in reconstructive surgery. In Indonesia, microsurgery became popular since 30 years ago. In the past, this subspecialty was developed for soft tissue transfer and replantation of amputated extremities.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3534
Author(s):  
Rebekka Götzl ◽  
Sebastian Sterzinger ◽  
Andreas Arkudas ◽  
Anja M. Boos ◽  
Sabine Semrau ◽  
...  

Background: Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment is an interdisciplinary challenge. Along with radio(chemo)therapy, surgery plays the central role in STS treatment. Little is known about the impact of reconstructive surgery on STS, particularly whether reconstructive surgery enhances STS resection success with the usage of flaps. Here, we analyzed the 10-year experience at a university hospital’s Comprehensive Cancer Center, focusing on the role of reconstructive surgery. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of STS-patients over 10 years. We investigated patient demographics, diagnosis, surgical management, tissue/function reconstruction, complication rates, resection status, local recurrence and survival. Results: Analysis of 290 patients showed an association between clear surgical margin (R0) resections and higher-grade sarcoma in patients with free flaps. Major complications were lower with primary wound closure than with flaps. Comparison of reconstruction techniques showed no significant differences in complication rates. Wound healing was impaired in STS recurrence. The local recurrence risk was over two times higher with primary wound closure than with flaps. Conclusion: Defect reconstructions in STS are reliable and safe. Plastic surgeons should have a permanent place in interdisciplinary surgical STS treatment, with the full armamentarium of reconstruction methods.


2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 394-422
Author(s):  
P. Frobert ◽  
R. Vaucher ◽  
G. Vaz ◽  
F. Gouin ◽  
P. Meeus ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. S372-S376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Visakha Suresh ◽  
Junheng Gao ◽  
Sin-Ho Jung ◽  
Brian Brigman ◽  
William Eward ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Weiß ◽  
A Korthaus ◽  
K-H Frosch ◽  
C Schlickewei ◽  
M Priemel

Author(s):  
Aurora G. Vincent ◽  
Anne E. Gunter ◽  
Yadranko Ducic ◽  
Likith Reddy

AbstractAlloplastic facial transplantation has become a new rung on the proverbial reconstructive ladder for severe facial wounds in the past couple of decades. Since the first transfer including bony components in 2006, numerous facial allotransplantations across many countries have been successfully performed, many incorporating multiple bony elements of the face. There are many unique considerations to facial transplantation of bone, however, beyond the considerations of simple soft tissue transfer. Herein, we review the current literature and considerations specific to bony facial transplantation focusing on the pertinent surgical anatomy, preoperative planning needs, intraoperative harvest and inset considerations, and postoperative protocols.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianni Bisogno ◽  
Giovanna Congiu ◽  
Maria Carmen Affinita ◽  
Giuseppe Maria Milano ◽  
Ilaria Zanetti ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Delattre ◽  
A. Ducasse ◽  
J. B. Flament ◽  
C. Kénési

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document