Clinical Performance Expectations: A Preliminary Study Comparing Physical Therapist Students, Clinical Instructors, and Academic Faculty

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Macht Sliwinski ◽  
Kathleen Schultze ◽  
Ruth Lyons Hansen ◽  
Shauna Malta ◽  
Suzanne R Babyar
2007 ◽  
Vol 87 (7) ◽  
pp. 833-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane U Jette ◽  
Alicia Bertoni ◽  
Renee Coots ◽  
Heidi Johnson ◽  
Catherine McLaughlin ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose The purpose of this study was to qualitatively explore clinical instructors’ (CIs) perceptions of students’ behaviors that comprise entry-level clinical performance, as well as how those perceptions were integrated into their decision making. Subjects The participants were 21 physical therapists who were CIs for physical therapist students. Methods Using a grounded theory approach, we conducted interviews, asking the question, “What is it about students’ performance that makes you see them as entry-level therapists?” We determined common themes among the interviews and developed a schema to explain the decision-making process. Results Participants identified 7 attributes that, when demonstrated to a sufficient degree, illustrated to them students’ ability to practice at the entry level. Those attributes were knowledge, clinical skills, safety, clinical decision making, self-directed learning, interpersonal communication, and professional demeanor. Participants viewed these attributes in concert to form a subjective “gut feeling” that a student demonstrated entry-level performance. A final theme emerged suggesting a definition of entry-level performance as “mentored independence.” Discussion and Conclusions Participants reported evaluating students’ performance based on attributes similar to those suggested by the American Physical Therapy Association's Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument and previous research. However, subjectivity also was involved in their decision about whether students were able to practice at the entry level. Participants also concluded that entry-level students need not be independent in all clinical situations.


2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 416-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn E. Roach ◽  
Jody S. Frost ◽  
Nora J. Francis ◽  
Scott Giles ◽  
Jon T. Nordrum ◽  
...  

Background Based on changes in core physical therapy documents and problems with the earlier version, the Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument (PT CPI): Version 1997 was revised to create the PT CPI: Version 2006. Objective The purpose of this study was to validate the PT CPI: Version 2006 for use with physical therapist students as a measure of clinical performance. Design This was a combined cross-sectional and prospective study. Methods A convenience sample of physical therapist students from the United States and Canada participated in this study. The PT CPI: Version 2006 was used to collect CPI item–level data from the clinical instructor about student performance at midterm and final evaluation periods in the clinical internship. Midterm evaluation data were collected from 196 students, and final evaluation data were collected from 171 students. The students who participated in the study had a mean age of 24.8 years (SD=2.3, range=21–41). Sixty-seven percent of the participants were from programs in the United States, and 33% were from Canada. Results The PT CPI: Version 2006 demonstrated good internal consistency, and factor analysis with varimax rotation produced a 3-factor solution explaining 94% of the variance. Construct validity was supported by differences in CPI item scores between students on early compared with final clinical experiences. Validity also was supported by significant score changes from midterm to final evaluations for students on both early and final internships and by fair to moderate correlations between prior clinical experience and remaining course work. Limitations This study did not examine rater reliability. Conclusion The results support the PT CPI: Version 2006 as a valid measure of physical therapist student clinical performance.


1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Awilda R Haskins ◽  
Colleen Rose-St Prix ◽  
Leonard Elbaum

1999 ◽  
Vol 79 (7) ◽  
pp. 653-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen W Hayes ◽  
Gail Huber ◽  
Jean Rogers ◽  
Babette Sanders

Abstract Background and Purpose. Clinical instructors (CIs) observe behavior to determine whether students have the skills assumed necessary for safe and effective delivery of physical therapy services. Studies have examined assumptions about necessary skills, but few studies have identified the types of student behaviors that are “red flags” for CIs. This study examined the student behaviors that negatively affect students' clinical performance, which can alert CIs to inadequate performance. Subjects. Twenty-eight female and 5 male CIs discussed the performance of 23 female and 17 male students who were anonymous. Methods. Using questionnaires and semistructured interviews that were taped and transcribed, CIs described demographics and incidents of unsafe and ineffective physical therapy. After reading the transcripts, investigators identified and classified the behaviors into categories and checked their classification for reliability (κ=.60–.75). Results. Behaviors in 3 categories emerged as red flags for CIs: 1 cognitive category—inadequate knowledge and psychomotor skill (43% of 134 behaviors)—and 2 noncognitive categories—unprofessional behavior (29.1%) and poor communication (27.6%). The CIs noticed and valued noncognitive behaviors but addressed cognitive behaviors more often with students. Students who did not receive feedback about their performance were unlikely to change their behavior. The CIs used cognitive behaviors often as reasons to recommend negative outcomes. Conclusion and Discussion. Clinical instructors need to identify unacceptable cognitive and noncognitive behaviors as early as possible in clinical experiences. Evidence suggests that they should discuss their concerns with students and expect students to change.


2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (12) ◽  
pp. 1661-1672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa K. Kenyon ◽  
Robin L. Dole ◽  
Stephanie P. Kelly

BackgroundTo prepare students for pediatric practice, the professional (entry-level) curriculum must reflect the essential knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA) required for pediatric physical therapist practice.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to develop consensus concerning the pediatric-specific KSA that should be expected of doctor of physical therapy (DPT) students at various points in the curriculum: prior to a pediatric clinical education experience, after a pediatric clinical education experience, and at the end of a DPT program.Design and MethodsThe study was conducted using the Delphi method. Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit pediatric academic faculty and pediatric clinical instructors. Three Web-based survey rounds were used to achieve consensus, defined as agreement among ≥70% of informants. The first round identified pediatric-specific KSA that were essential for DPT students to demonstrate at the identified points in the curriculum. In the second round, informants indicated their level of agreement with each item identified in the first round. Items that achieved consensus were included in the third round, in which informants rated the level of proficiency that DPT students should demonstrate related to pediatric-specific KSA.ResultsConsensus revealed the informants' perspectives concerning pediatric-specific KSA that a DPT student should be able to demonstrate at the identified curricular points. Consensus was reached on items in the curricular categories of basic science and foundations for practice; common pediatric diagnoses/pathologies, examination, interventions/plan of care/documentation; and general skills and abilities.LimitationsLimitations included the small sample size and the potential for informants to feel uncomfortable prioritizing KSA.ConclusionsThis study is an initial step toward identifying pediatric-specific KSA that should be demonstrated by DPT students.


2000 ◽  
Vol 80 (7) ◽  
pp. 652-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Hrachovy ◽  
Nancy Clopton ◽  
Kristi Baggett ◽  
Tamara Garber ◽  
Jennifer Cantwell ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical instructors' (CIs') acceptance of and self-reported adherence to instructions for use of The Blue MACS (5th edition) for evaluating the clinical performance of physical therapist students. Subjects and Methods. One hundred twenty-four usable survey instruments were returned by CIs. Results. Twenty-two items from The Blue MACS were collapsed into a score representing acceptance, and 10 items were collapsed into a score representing reported adherence to instructions. Ninety-six percent of the CIs surveyed expressed a positive opinion of the instrument. Ninety-eight percent of the CIs reported at least moderately consistent adherence to instructions. Conclusion and Discussion. The instrument was regarded as a useful tool, and most CIs reported using the instrument according to the instructions. A positive opinion of the clinical performance assessment instrument is desirable to facilitate its use by CIs. Consistent use by different CIs is desirable to promote accurate communication among students, CIs, and the educational institution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document