Congenital heart disease, cardiopulmonary bypass, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome, and outcome: Evolving understanding of critical care inflammation immunology *

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 1178-1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry J. Zimmerman
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-124
Author(s):  
D. V. Borisenko ◽  
A. A. Ivkin ◽  
D. L. Shukevich

Highlights. The article discusses the pathophysiological aspects of cardiopulmonary bypass and the mechanisms underlying the development of the systemic inflammatory response in children following congenital heart surgery. We summarize and report the most relevant preventive strategies aimed at reducing the systemic inflammatory response, including both, CPB-related methods and pharmacological ones.The growing number of children with congenital heart defects requires the development of more advanced technologies for their surgical treatment. However, cardiopulmonary bypass is required in almost all surgical techniques. Despite the tremendous progress and recent advances in cardiopulmonary bypass techniques, the systemic inflammatory response syndrome associated with these surgeries remains unresolved. The review summarizes the causes and mechanisms underlying its development. The most commonly used preventive strategies are reported, including standard and modified ultrafiltration, leukocyte filters, and pharmacological agents (systemic glucocorticoids, aprotinin, and antioxidants).The role of cardioplegia and hypothermia in the reduction of systemic inflammation is defined. Cardiac surgery centers around the world use a variety of techniques and pharmacological approaches, drawing on the results of randomized clinical studies. However, there are no clear and definite clinical guidelines aimed at reducing the systemic inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass in children. It remains a significant problem for pediatric intensive care by aggravating their postoperative status, prolonging the length of the in-hospital stay, and reducing the survival rates.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e0162179
Author(s):  
Qinghua Yang ◽  
Jianyi Liao ◽  
Jie Huang ◽  
Yi Ping Li ◽  
Shungen Huang ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 562-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophronia O. Turner-Gomes ◽  
Lesley Mitchell ◽  
W.G. Williams ◽  
Maureen Andrew

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-61
Author(s):  
Manisha Shrestha ◽  
Anand Kumar

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is a frequent and serious problem faced by clinicians in day to day practice and is a major factor of intensive care morbidity and mortality. The American College of Chest Physicians and the American Society of Critical Care Medicine in 1991 published definitions and criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome.  Since then many researches have been undertaken  to better understand the pathophysiology of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and to determine the accuracy of its diagnostic criteria. The criteria set by the 1991 consensus  is still popularly  used  today. However,  with  the current  knowledge   on this matter many researchers have put forward the need of refinement in the criteria of systemic inflammatory response syndrome defined by 1991 consensus. This article aims to review  the epidemiology, etiology, pathophysiology, laboratory diagnosis,  treatment and the current views regarding SIRS.Journal of Universal College of Medical SciencesVol. 6, No. 1, 2018, Page: 56-61


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document