TREATMENT OF VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER MAY IMPROVE BONE PAIN AND MUSCLE STRENGTH

2000 ◽  
pp. 187 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER J. VAN VELDHUIZEN ◽  
SARAH A. TAYLOR ◽  
STEPHEN WILLIAMSON ◽  
BETTY M. DREES
2000 ◽  
Vol 163 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER J. VAN VELDHUIZEN ◽  
SARAH A. TAYLOR ◽  
STEPHEN WILLIAMSON ◽  
BETTY M. DREES

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A189-A190
Author(s):  
Kamrun Naher ◽  
Komandur Thrupthi ◽  
Kazi Samsuddoha ◽  
Sneha Galiveeti ◽  
Vivien Leung

Abstract Background: Denosumab can lead to severe hypocalcemia in patients with underlying risk factors such as vitamin D deficiency, low PTH, hypomagnesemia, and CKD. Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody against RANKL, reducing the activity of osteoclasts and thus reducing the release of calcium in the bloodstream causing hypocalcemia. Hypocalcemia can range from mild to severe symptoms requiring prolonged hospitalization. Medications such as zoledronic acid and Denosumab are known to reduce the occurrence of Skeletal related events (pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, and radiation to bone). For metastatic prostate cancer, about 90% can develop bone metastasis with significant morbidity and mortality [1]. Our patient presented with severe hypocalcemia after denosumab use without any above risk factors. Clinical Case: A 66-year-old male with a medical history of Prostate cancer with Metastasis to chest and bone presented to ER with syncope. Patient-reported poor oral intake, nausea, and vomiting for the last few days. In the ER, the patient was found afebrile, bp 116/76, HR 92, saturating 100% on room air. On examination, the patient was found lethargic, malnourished, foley in place due to chronic urinary retention. The abdomen was soft and non-tender. Laboratory findings were significant for Hb 9.1, Na 133, K3.6, bicarb 21, total calcium (Ca) 4.2, ionized Ca 0.63 and corrected Ca 5.4, magnesium 1.6, phosphorus 2.1, albumin 3.3, ALT 218, AST 229, ALP 1607. Lipase 82, Total bilirubin 1.5, direct bilirubin 0.8. Spot Urinary Ca 0.7, Vitamin D 25 OH 36.9, serum PTH 225 pg/mL. Serum cortisol AM 20.9, BUN 16, and serum Creatinine 1.0. The patient was started on 11g calcium gluconate in 1L dextrose @ 50c/hr and calcitriol 0.25mcg twice daily. Serum Ca level was monitored every 6 hours and reached 6.7. Later was started on Ca carbonate 1250 TID with meals. Finally, after electrolyte correction, the patient clinically improved and was discharged with the plan to follow Calcium at the outpatient clinic. On review of previous labs at the oncology clinic, the patient received Denosumab at his oncologist’s clinic 10 days before this hospital admission, last Ca level from 6 months ago 8.6, the patient was not any vitamin D or Ca supplement. Conclusion: Many case reports have been published on severe hypocalcemia after denosumab usage. Several patients had underlying risk factors such as vitamin D deficiency, osteoblastic lesion, and AKI leading to an additional cause of hypocalcemia. We emphasize careful monitoring of serum Ca levels particularly in the first few weeks of treatment even without significant risk factors for hypocalcemia. References: [1] Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer: an autopsy study of 1,589 patients. Bubendorf L, Schöpfer A, Wagner U, Sauter G, Moch H, Willi N, Gasser TC, Mihatsch MJ. . Hum Pathol. 2000 May; 31(5):578–83


2021 ◽  
pp. 205141582199360
Author(s):  
Ghanshyam Kumawat ◽  
Vijay Chaudhary ◽  
Anurag Garg ◽  
Nishkarsh Mehta ◽  
Gagan Talwar ◽  
...  

Objective: We aimed to find out the association of low serum vitamin D levels with the incidence of prostate cancer through a prospective case-control study. Material and methods: This study was carried out in the tertiary care hospital (India). All newly diagnosed patients of prostate cancer and age-matched controls were included. Serum vitamin D levels were measured in all of them. Vitamin D status (ng/mL) was classified as severe deficiency <10, moderate deficiency 10–<30, normal 30–100, and toxicity >100. Normality of the data was tested by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, statistical analysis was done with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26.0, p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: In our study, 320 cases and 320 controls were included. The mean vitamin D levels in cases and controls were 15.71 ± 6.5 (ng/mL) and 17.63 ± 4.54 (ng/mL), respectively, ( p-Value <0.01). Patients with severe vitamin D deficiency (73.58%) had a Gleason score ⩾8 on biopsy and 79.24% of them had a serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level >20 ng/mL. Conclusion: We had concluded that there was no significant association between vitamin D deficiency and increased risk of prostate cancer, although patients with higher-grade prostate cancer and with higher PSA level had severe vitamin D deficiency. Level of evidence: Not applicable for this multicentre audit.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6589-6589
Author(s):  
Aaron Galaznik ◽  
Emelly Rusli ◽  
Vicki Wing ◽  
Rahul Jain ◽  
Sheila Diamond ◽  
...  

6589 Background: While patients with cancer are known to be at increased risk of infection in part due to the immunocompromising nature of cancer treatments, recent data indicate a particularly high risk for COVID-19 infection and poor outcomes (Wang et al., 2020). A recent study (Meltzer et al., 2020) demonstrated Vitamin D deficiency may increase risk of COVID-19 infection, and a small randomized controlled trial in Spain reported significant improvement in mortality among hospitalized patients treated with calcifediol. Vitamin D deficiency has been reported in two leading causes of cancer deaths: breast and prostate. In this study, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis on nationally representative electronic medical records (EMR) to assess whether Vitamin D deficiency affects risk of COVID-19 among these patients. Methods: Patients with breast (female) or prostate (male) cancer were identified between 3/1/2018 and 3/1/2020 from EMR data provided pro-bono by the COVID-19 Research Database ( covid19researchdatabase.org ). Patients with an ICD-10 code for Vitamin D deficiency or < 20ng/mL 20(OH)D laboratory result within 12 months prior to 3/1/2020 were classified as Vitamin D deficient. COVID-19 diagnosis was defined using ICD-10 codes and laboratory results for COVID-19 at any time after 3/1/2020. Logistic regressions, adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, were conducted to estimate the effect of Vitamin D deficiency on COVID-19 incidence in each cancer cohort. Results: A total of 16,287 breast cancer and 14,919 prostate cancer patients were included in the study. The average age was 68.9 years in the breast cancer cohort and 73.6 years in the prostate cancer cohort. The breast cancer cohort consisted of 85% Whites, 13% Black or African Americans, and less than 5% of other races. A similar race distribution was observed in the prostate cancer cohort. Unadjusted analysis showed the risk of COVID-19 was higher among Vitamin D deficient patients compared to non-deficient patients in both cohorts (breast: OR = 1.60 [95% C.I.: 1.15, 2.20]; prostate: OR = 1.59 [95% C.I.: 1.08, 2.33]). Similar findings were observed when assessed in subgroups of patients with newly diagnosed cancer in the dataset, as well as after adjusting for baseline characteristics. Conclusions: Our study suggests breast and prostate cancer patients may have an elevated risk of COVID-19 infection if Vitamin D deficient. These results support findings by Meltzer et al., 2020 demonstrating a relationship between Vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19 infection. While a randomized clinical trial is warranted to confirm the role for Vitamin D supplementation in preventing COVID-19, our study underscores the importance of monitoring Vitamin D levels across and within cancer populations, particularly in the midst of the global COVID-19 pandemic.


2010 ◽  
pp. 213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gurmit Singh ◽  
De Ciantis ◽  
Henry ◽  
Yashpal

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuncay Yumrutepe ◽  
Zeynep Ayfer Aytemur ◽  
Ozlem Baysal ◽  
Hulya Taskapan ◽  
Cagatay M. Taskapan ◽  
...  

Summary Objectives: vitamin D is important for muscle function and it affects different aspects of muscle metabolism. This study aim to determine whether serum 25(OH) D levels are related to lung functions, physical performance and balance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: in 90 patients with COPD and 57 healthy controls lung function tests, physical performance tests (time up and go, gait velocity test, sit-to-stand test, isometric strength, isokinetic strength), static (functional reach test) and dynamic (time up and go) balance tests and the association of 25(OH)D levels with lung functions, physical performance and balance were evaluated. Results: the COPD patients had significantly more deficit in physical function and balance parameters, and in dynamic balance test (p<0.005). Isokinetic knee muscle strength (flexor and extensor) in COPD patients was significantly lower than in the controls (p<0.05); FEV1 (p=0.008), FVC (p=0.02), FEV1/FVC (p=0.04), TLC (p=0.01) were lower in COPD patients with vitamin D deficiency [25(OH) D less than 15ng/mL] than in COPD patients without vitamin D deficiency. Hand grip test (p=0.000) and isokinetic knee muscle strength (flexor and extensor) (p<0.05) were also lower in COPD patients with vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D deficiency was more pronounced in patients with stage III COPD (p<0.05). Conclusion: patients with COPD had worst physical functioning, poor balance and less muscle strength. Severe disturbed lung and peripheral muscle functions are more pronounced in COPD patients with vitamin D deficiency.


The Prostate ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (10) ◽  
pp. 782-794
Author(s):  
Zhiqiang Liu ◽  
Stephen F. Murphy ◽  
Jian Huang ◽  
Lan Zhao ◽  
Christel C. Hall ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document