IS A FAMILY HISTORY OF COLORECTAL CANCER AS RELEVANT FOR ULCERATIVE COLITIS PATIENTS AS FOR COTTON-TOP TAMARINS?

1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 238
Author(s):  
Anders Ekbom
1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 448-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Matsuda ◽  
T. Watanabe ◽  
M. Shinozaki ◽  
T. Yokoyama ◽  
S. Sasaki ◽  
...  

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 631
Author(s):  
Karin Alvarez ◽  
Alessandra Cassana ◽  
Marjorie De La Fuente ◽  
Tamara Canales ◽  
Mario Abedrapo ◽  
...  

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent neoplasm in Chile and its mortality rate is rising in all ages. However, studies characterizing CRC according to the age of onset are still lacking. This study aimed to identify clinical, pathological, and molecular features of CRC in Chilean patients according to the age of diagnosis: early- (≤50 years; EOCRC), intermediate- (51–69 years; IOCRC), and late-onset (≥70 years; LOCRC). The study included 426 CRC patients from Clinica Las Condes, between 2007 and 2019. A chi-square test was applied to explore associations between age of onset and clinicopathological characteristics. Body Mass Index (BMI) differences according to age of diagnosis was evaluated through t-test. Overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. We found significant differences between the age of onset, and gender, BMI, family history of cancer, TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors stage, OS, and CSS. EOCRC category was characterized by a family history of cancer, left-sided tumors with a more advanced stage of the disease but better survival at 10 years, and lower microsatellite instability (MSI), with predominant germline mutations. IOCRC has shown clinical similarities with the EOCRC and molecular similarities to the LOCRC, which agrees with other reports.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 967-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharati Bapat ◽  
Noralane M. Lindor ◽  
John Baron ◽  
Kim Siegmund ◽  
Lin Li ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. S-649-S-650
Author(s):  
Ryan E. Childers ◽  
Swathi Eluri ◽  
Christine Vazquez ◽  
Theodore M. Bayless ◽  
Susan Hutfless

2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-162-S-163
Author(s):  
Anthony Razzak ◽  
Kelly Yu ◽  
Paul Pinsky ◽  
Tom Riley ◽  
Robert E. Schoen

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 917-926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel D. Buchanan ◽  
Aung K. Win ◽  
Michael D. Walsh ◽  
Rhiannon J. Walters ◽  
Mark Clendenning ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 36 (16) ◽  
pp. 2111-2114 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Nakama ◽  
B Zhang ◽  
K Fukazawa ◽  
A.S.M Abdul Fattah

BMC Cancer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaja Tikk ◽  
Korbinian Weigl ◽  
Michael Hoffmeister ◽  
Svitlana Igel ◽  
Matthias Schwab ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Andrada Ciucă ◽  
Ramona Moldovan ◽  
Sebastian Pintea ◽  
Dan Dumitrașcu ◽  
Adriana Băban

Background and Aims: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent form of cancer worldwide, and approximately one third of cases have a positive family history of CRC or associated cancers. Colonoscopy is one of the most effective methods of screening for CRC. Uptake of colonoscopy is suboptimal, and many countries lack a national screening programme. Our study aims at exploring and ranking several factual and psychological variables according to their accuracy in discriminating between screeners and non-screeners for CRC in a convenience sample of people over 50 years of age. Methods: The study included 103 individuals aged over 50 years, recruited from day centres for the elderly. We explored socio-demographic variables, frequency of colonoscopy, previous recommendations for screening, health literacy and family history of cancer. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to establish the discriminative value for each variable between the positive and negative decision for colonoscopy screening. Areas under the curve (AUC) and their equivalent Cohen‘s d values were calculated. Results: Almost a quarter (25.75%) of participants reported previous colonoscopy screening. ROC curve analysis shows that colonoscopy uptake is best discriminated by perceived benefits of screening (AUC=0.71, d=0.78, p<0.001), previous recommendations for screening (AUC=0.68, d=0.69, p<0.001) and previous recommendations for preventive measures (AUC=0.67, d=0.64, p<0.001). Conclusions: Recommendations from healthcare professionals lead to improved colonoscopy uptake when emphasising the benefits of screening. Results can further inform psychosocial interventions by bringing empirical evidence to emphasize screening benefits and explicit recommendations for individuals at risk for CRC cancer.


2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Young Choi ◽  
Byeong Gwan Kim ◽  
Ji Won Kim ◽  
Kook Lae Lee ◽  
Ji Bong Jeong ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document