scholarly journals BLOOD PRESSURE LOWERING TREATMENT FOR PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: AN INDIVIDUAL-PARTICIPANT DATA META-ANALYSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. e80
Author(s):  
Ana Catarina Pin Pinho-Gomes ◽  
Luis Azevedo ◽  
Emma Copland ◽  
Dexter Canoy ◽  
Milad Nazarzadeh ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. e7
Author(s):  
Emma Copland ◽  
Dexter Canoy ◽  
Milad Nazarzadeh ◽  
Zeinab Bidel ◽  
Mark Woodward ◽  
...  

The Lancet ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 398 (10313) ◽  
pp. 1803-1810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milad Nazarzadeh ◽  
Zeinab Bidel ◽  
Dexter Canoy ◽  
Emma Copland ◽  
Malgorzata Wamil ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.C Pinho-Gomes ◽  
L Azevedo ◽  
E Copland ◽  
D Canoy ◽  
M Nazarzadeh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although observational studies have suggested an association between elevated blood pressure (BP) and increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), randomised evidence on the effects of pharmacological blood pressure lowering on the risk of new-onset AF remains limited. Purpose To investigate the effects of pharmacological BP lowering on the risk of AF overall and stratified by baseline risk of AF and by drug class. Methods We extracted individual participant data from trials with over 1,000 person-years of follow-up that had randomly assigned patients to different classes of BP-lowering drugs, BP-lowering drugs vs placebo, or to more vs less intensive BP-lowering regimens. We investigated the effects of BP lowering on the risk of new-onset AF using fixed-effect one-stage individual participant data meta-analyses based on Cox proportional hazards models stratified by trial. Results Twenty-one trials were included with a total of 194,041 patients, in whom 6,357 new-onset and 516 recurrent AF events were recorded. The hazard ratio for new-onset AF was 1.01, 95% CI [0.95–1.07] per each 5-mmHg reduction in systolic BP, and meta-regression suggested that treatment effects were similar irrespective of the intensity of systolic BP reduction. Patients were overall at low risk of AF at baseline (median 2.3%, IQR [1.2–3.4%] at 5 years), and there was no evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effects across thirds of risk and 10-mmHg strata of baseline systolic BP (Figure). There was also no clear evidence that treatment effects differed between drug classes when renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and calcium channel blockers were compared with placebo and/or standard treatment. Conclusion In a low-risk population, pharmacological BP lowering did not reduce the risk of new-onset AF. Further research is needed to understand whether the effects would be different in high-risk individuals, and to better clarify the existence of class-specific effects. Figure 1. Forest plot Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation


PLoS Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. e1003599
Author(s):  
Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes ◽  
Luis Azevedo ◽  
Emma Copland ◽  
Dexter Canoy ◽  
Milad Nazarzadeh ◽  
...  

Background Randomised evidence on the efficacy of blood pressure (BP)-lowering treatment to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of BP-lowering drugs in patients with and without AF at baseline. Methods and findings The study was based on the resource provided by the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration (BPLTTC), in which individual participant data (IPD) were extracted from trials with over 1,000 patient-years of follow-up in each arm, and that had randomly assigned patients to different classes of BP-lowering drugs, BP-lowering drugs versus placebo, or more versus less intensive BP-lowering regimens. For this study, only trials that had collected information on AF status at baseline were included. The effects of BP-lowering treatment on a composite endpoint of major cardiovascular events (stroke, ischaemic heart disease or heart failure) according to AF status at baseline were estimated using fixed-effect one-stage IPD meta-analyses based on Cox proportional hazards models stratified by trial. Furthermore, to assess whether the associations between the intensity of BP reduction and cardiovascular outcomes are similar in those with and without AF at baseline, we used a meta-regression. From the full BPLTTC database, 28 trials (145,653 participants) were excluded because AF status at baseline was uncertain or unavailable. A total of 22 trials were included with 188,570 patients, of whom 13,266 (7%) had AF at baseline. Risk of bias assessment showed that 20 trials were at low risk of bias and 2 trials at moderate risk. Meta-regression showed that relative risk reductions were proportional to trial-level intensity of BP lowering in patients with and without AF at baseline. Over 4.5 years of median follow-up, a 5-mm Hg systolic BP (SBP) reduction lowered the risk of major cardiovascular events both in patients with AF (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83 to 1.00) and in patients without AF at baseline (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.93), with no difference between subgroups. There was no evidence for heterogeneity of treatment effects by baseline SBP or drug class in patients with AF at baseline. The findings of this study need to be interpreted in light of its potential limitations, such as the limited number of trials, limitation in ascertaining AF cases due to the nature of the arrhythmia and measuring BP in patients with AF. Conclusions In this meta-analysis, we found that BP-lowering treatment reduces the risk of major cardiovascular events similarly in individuals with and without AF. Pharmacological BP lowering for prevention of cardiovascular events should be recommended in patients with AF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document