PF703 LONG-TERM FOSTAMATINIB TREATMENT OF ADULTS WITH IMMUNE THROMBOCYTOPENIA (ITP) DURING THE PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL PROGRAM

Abstract Study Objectives To assess long-term efficacy and safety of lemborexant (LEM), a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist, versus placebo in adults with insomnia disorder. Methods This was a 12-month, global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group phase 3 study comprising a 6-month placebo-controlled period (reported here) followed by a 6-month active-treatment-only period (reported separately). A total of 949 participants with insomnia (age ≥18 years) were randomized, received treatment with an oral dose of placebo or LEM (5 mg [LEM5] or 10 mg [LEM10]) and were analyzed. Sleep onset and sleep maintenance endpoints were analyzed from daily electronic sleep diary data. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored throughout the study. Results Decreases from baseline in patient-reported (subjective) sleep onset latency and subjective wake after sleep onset, and increases from baseline in subjective sleep efficiency, were significantly greater with LEM5 and LEM10 versus placebo. Significant benefits over placebo were observed at the end of month 6, and at most time points assessed over the 6-month period, indicating long-term sustained efficacy of LEM. A significantly greater percentage of sleep onset responders and sleep maintenance responders were observed with LEM treatment versus placebo. Participants treated with LEM reported a significant improvement in quality of sleep after 6 months versus placebo. The majority of TEAEs were mild or moderate. There was a low rate of serious TEAEs and no deaths. Conclusions LEM5 and LEM10 provided significant benefit on sleep onset and sleep maintenance in individuals with insomnia disorder versus placebo, and was well tolerated. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02952820; ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu, EudraCT Number 2015-001463-39

Download Full-text

Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Long-term results of a phase 3 multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.6004 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 6004-6004 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Ming-Yuan Chen ◽

Qi Yang ◽

Minghuang Hong ◽

Ming-Huang Hong

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽

Induction Chemotherapy ◽

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽

Long Term Results ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Free Survival ◽

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

6004 Background: Initial 3-year results from our clinical trial in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients showed that induction chemotherapy (IC) with cisplatin and fluorouracil (PF) resulted in improved disease-free survival (DFS) with a marginally significant effect on distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), but the effect of IC on locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly. Here, we present 5-year follow-up results. Methods: Our trial was a randomized, open-label phase 3 trial comparing IC followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus CCRT alone in patients with stage III-IVB (except T3N0-1) NPC. The IC followed by CCRT group received cisplatin (80 mg/m² d1) and fluorouracil (800 mg/m² d1-5) every three weeks for two cycles before CCRT. Both groups were treated with 80 mg/m² cisplatin every three weeks concurrently with radiotherapy. The primary endpoints were DFS and DMFS. We did efficacy analyses in the 476 randomized patients (intention-to-treat population). Results: After a median follow-up of 82.6 months, the 5-year DFS rate was 73.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 67.7-79.1) in the IC followed by CCRT group and 63.1% (95% CI 56.8-69.4) in the CCRT alone group (P = 0.005). The 5-year DMFS rate was also significantly higher in the IC followed by CCRT group (82.8%, 95% CI 77.9-87.7) than in the CCRT alone group (73.1%, 95% CI 67.2-79.0, P = 0.013). Our updated analysis revealed an OS benefit of IC: the 5-year OS rate was 80.8% in the IC followed by CCRT group versus 76.8% in the CCRT alone group (P = 0.045). There were no significant differences in the rate of grade 3–4 late adverse events during follow-up between the two groups. Conclusions: IC followed by CCRT provides long-term DFS, DMFS, and OS benefits compared with CCRT alone in locoregionally advanced NPC and, therefore, can be recommended for these patients. Clinical trial information: NCT00705627.

Download Full-text