scholarly journals Clinical and Microbiological Outcomes of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Treatment in Adults with Gram-Negative Bacteremia: A Subset Analysis from the Phase 3 Clinical Trial Program

Author(s):  
John E. Mazuski ◽  
Florian Wagenlehner ◽  
Antoni Torres ◽  
Yehuda Carmeli ◽  
Joseph W. Chow ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Thomas ◽  
Harvey Levy ◽  
Stephen Amato ◽  
Jerry Vockley ◽  
Roberto Zori ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory G. Stone ◽  
Leanne Gasink ◽  
Paul Newell ◽  
Helen Broadhurst ◽  
Angela Wardman ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (7) ◽  
pp. e02584-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory G. Stone ◽  
Paul Newell ◽  
Patricia A. Bradford

ABSTRACT The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens has generated a requirement for new treatment options. Avibactam, a novel non-β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor, restores the activity of ceftazidime against Ambler class A, C, and some class D β-lactamase-producing strains of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The in vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam versus comparators were evaluated against 1,440 clinical isolates obtained in a phase 3 clinical trial in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01499290). Overall, in vitro activities were determined for 803 Enterobacteriaceae, 70 P. aeruginosa, 304 Gram-positive aerobic, and 255 anaerobic isolates obtained from 1,066 randomized patients at baseline. Susceptibility was determined by broth microdilution. The most commonly isolated Gram-negative, Gram-positive, and anaerobic pathogens were Escherichia coli (n = 549), Streptococcus anginosus (n = 130), and Bacteroides fragilis (n = 96), respectively. Ceftazidime-avibactam was highly active against isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, with an overall MIC90 of 0.25 mg/liter. In contrast, the MIC90 for ceftazidime alone was 32 mg/liter. The MIC90 value for ceftazidime-avibactam (4 mg/liter) was one dilution lower than that of ceftazidime alone (8 mg/liter) against isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The ceftazidime-avibactam MIC90 for 109 ceftazidime-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae isolates was 2 mg/liter, and the MIC range for 6 ceftazidime-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa isolates was 8 to 32 mg/liter. The MIC90 values were within the range of susceptibility for the study drugs permitted per the protocol in the phase 3 study to provide coverage for aerobic Gram-positive and anaerobic pathogens. These findings demonstrate the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against bacterial pathogens commonly observed in cIAI patients, including ceftazidime-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01499290.)


2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory G. Stone ◽  
Patricia A. Bradford ◽  
Paul Newell ◽  
Angela Wardman

ABSTRACT The in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam was evaluated against 341 Gram-negative isolates from 333 patients in a randomized, phase 3 clinical trial of patients with complicated urinary tract or intra-abdominal infections caused by ceftazidime-nonsusceptible pathogens (NCT01644643). Ceftazidime-avibactam MIC90 values against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (including several class B or D enzyme producers that avibactam does not inhibit) were 1 and 64 μg/ml, respectively. Overall, the ceftazidime-avibactam activity against ceftazidime-nonsusceptible isolates was comparable to the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam previously reported against ceftazidime-susceptible isolates. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01644643.)


HemaSphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (S1) ◽  
pp. 306
Author(s):  
J. Bussel ◽  
D. Arnold ◽  
R. Boccia ◽  
M. Boxer ◽  
N. Cooper ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 546-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B. Bussel ◽  
Donald M. Arnold ◽  
Michael A. Boxer ◽  
Nichola Cooper ◽  
Jiri Mayer ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S994-S994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard G Wunderink ◽  
Richard G Wunderink ◽  
Yuko Matsunaga ◽  
Mari Ari ◽  
Mari Ariyasu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a novel siderophore cephalosporin with activity against a broad range of Gram-negative bacteria. In this study, Day 14 all-cause mortality (ACM) rates were compared between CFDC and meropenem (MEM) in patients with nosocomial Gram-negative pneumonia. Methods The study (NCT03032380) was a Phase 3, international, double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority study in hospitalized patients with ventilator-associated, hospital-acquired, or healthcare-associated pneumonia caused by suspected Gram-negative bacteria. Patients were treated with CFDC (2 g, q8h) or MEM (2 g, q8h), both infused for 3 hours, for 7–14 days. Adjunctive linezolid (600 mg, q12h, ≥5 days) was given in both arms to cover Gram-positive bacteria. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of CFDC to MEM for Day 14 ACM rate in the modified intent-to-treat population (mITT; non-inferiority margin: –12.5%). Key secondary endpoints were clinical and microbiological outcomes at test of cure (TOC), and Day 28 mortality. Safety was investigated up to 28 days after the end of treatment. Results In the ITT population, 148 patients were randomized to CFDC and 150 to MEM: 59.7% were ventilated, 32.6% had failure of prior therapy, the median APACHE II score was 15, and 6.0% had concomitant Gram-negative bacteremia at baseline. In the mITT population, non-inferiority of CFDC to MEM for Day 14 ACM was demonstrated; CFDC: 12.4% (18 out of 145 patients) vs. MEM: 11.6% (17 out of 146 patients); treatment difference: 0.8; 95% confidence interval: –6.6; 8.2. Comparable Day 28 ACM (CFDC: 21.0% vs. MEM: 20.5%), clinical cure (CFDC: 64.8% vs. MEM: 66.7%), and microbiological eradication (CFDC: 47.6% vs. MEM: 48.0%) rates were demonstrated in the mITT population at TOC. Clinical cure rates for major target pathogens at TOC were similar between CFDC and MEM arms (figure). The rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), drug-related TEAEs, serious AEs, discontinuation due to TEAEs, and deaths were similar between treatment arms (table). Conclusion This study demonstrated the non-inferiority of CFDC to high-dose MEM for the pre-specified endpoint of Day 14 ACM. No unexpected safety signals were observed in the study. Disclosures Richard G. Wunderink, MD, Merck (Consultant, Grant/Research Support), Shionogi Inc. (Consultant), Yuko Matsunaga, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Employee), Mari Ariyasu, BPharm, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee), Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Consultant), Anju Menon, PhD, Shionogi Inc. (Employee), Tsutae Den Nagata, MD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee).


Author(s):  
James F. Donohue ◽  
Sanjay Sethi ◽  
Craig N. Barnes ◽  
Edmund J. Moran ◽  
Srikanth Pendyala ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document