Complex Bileaflet Mitral Valve Repair (Barlow's) Using the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 276-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saqib Masroor ◽  
L. Wiley Nifong ◽  
W. Randolph Chitwood
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Bypass ◽  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Da Vinci ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Robotic Surgical System ◽  
Surgical System

Robotic mitral valve repair (RMVR) is less invasive and potentially more precise. However, RMVR lengthens both cardiopulmonary bypass and arrested heart times. In our initial experience, only posterior leaflet repair and/or annuloplasty were performed. With increasing experience, we have performed more complex bileaflet RMVR. A 50-year-old man presented with severe mitral regurgitation. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) demonstrated a complex bileaflet prolapse and preserved left ventricular function. Through a 4 cm working port and with the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) RMVR was performed. Details of the technique and patient's hospital course are described. The repair comprised closure of clefts between A3 and P3, quadrangular resection of P2, transfer of multiple chords from P2 to A2/A3 and a #38 Cosgrove-Edwards (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) band annuloplasty. Nitinol U-Clips (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) were used to complete the annuloplasty. Postoperative TEE showed no mitral regurgitation. The patient was discharged on the third postoperative day. Cardiopulmonary bypass and arrested heart times were 3 hours and 29 minutes and 2 hours and 59 minutes, respectively. Complex bileaflet repair of mitral valve with Barlow's disease can be successfully performed with the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess the durability of repair.

scholarly journals Ventricular arrhythmias in patients with functional mitral regurgitation and implantable cardiac devices: implications of mitral valve repair with Mitraclip

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Benito Gonzalez ◽  
X Freixa ◽  
C Godino ◽  
M Taramasso ◽  
R Estevez-Loureiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Limited information has been reported regarding the impact of percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) on ventricular arrhythmic (VA) burden. The aim of this study was to address the incidence of VA and appropriate antitachycardia implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapies before and after PMVR. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients with heart failure with reduce left ventricular ejection fraction, functional mitral regurgitation grade 3+ or 4+ and an active ICD or cardiac resynchronizer who underwent PMVR in any of the eleven recruiting centers. Only patients with complete available device VA monitoring from one-year before to one year after PMVR were included. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were collected before PMVR and at 12-months follow-up. Results 93 patients (68.2±10.9 years old, male 88.2%) were enrolled. PMVR was successfully performed in all patients and device success at discharge was 91.4%. At 12-months follow-up, we observed a significant reduction in mitral regurgitation severity, NT-proBNP and prevalence of severe pulmonary hypertension and severe kidney disease. Patients also referred a significant improvement in NYHA functional class and showed a non-significant trend to reserve left ventricular remodeling. After PMVR a significant decrease in the incidence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (5.0–17.8 vs 2.7–13.5, p=0.002), sustained VT or ventricular fibrillation (0.9–2.5 vs 0.5–2.9, p=0.012) and ICD antitachycardia therapies (2.5–12.0 vs 0.9–5.0, p=0.033) were observed. Conclusion PMVR was related to a reduction in arrhythmic burden and ICD therapies in our cohort. Proportion of patients who presented ven Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Surgery for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Valve Repair v. Valve Replacement with Chordal Preservation

1994 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-94
Author(s):  
Masaharu Shigenobu ◽  
Shunji Sano
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Left Ventricular Function ◽  
Ventricular Function ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Mitral Valve Replacement ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Repair Group

This study compares mitral valve repair and mitral valve replacement with chordal preservation for chronic mitral regurgitation due to myxomatous degeneration with special reference to left ventricular function. Twenty-six patients underwent complete preoperative and 2 years later postoperative echocardiography study. Thirteen patients underwent mitral valve replacement associated with preservation of chordae tendineae and papillary muscles, and 13 patients had mitral valve repair. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for clinical findings, hemodynamic profiles, or left ventricular function compared prior to surgery. After correcting mitral regurgitation, increase in cardiac index was significant for the repair group. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume decreased in both groups. Left ventricular end-systolic volume significantly decreased in the repair group, but remained unchanged in the replacement group. Both ejection fraction and mean left ventricular circumferential fiber shortening velocity (mVcf) decreased in the replacement group, but significantly increased in the repair group 2 years after surgery. These findings suggest valve replacement with chordal preservation shows less improvement in ventricular systolic function late after surgery compared with mitral valve repair.

scholarly journals Residual mitral regurgitation impact on outcomes after mitraclip therapy: five-year follow-up from the GRASP registry

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
AM Caggegi ◽  
P Capranzano ◽  
S Scandura ◽  
S Mangiafico ◽  
G Castania ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Surgical Risk ◽  
High Surgical Risk ◽  
Mitraclip Therapy

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background – Although percutaneous mitral valve repair is an attractive alternative treatment option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) at high surgical risk, residual MR is commonly observed after the procedure and little is known about its impact on outcomes after MitraClip therapy, expecially in patients with severe left ventricular (LV) impairment. Purpose – The aim of this prospective, observational study was to evaluate the impact of residual MR (MR ≤1+ vs. MR >1+) on long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair with the MitraClip System in high surgical risk patients presenting with moderate-to-severe or severe MR and with severe reduction of LV ejection fraction (EF). Methods – Patients enrolled in the prospective Getting Reduction of Mitral Insufficiency by Percutaneous Clip Implantation (GRASP) with functional MR and EF ≤30% who were eligible at almost five-year follow-up were included in the present analysis.  The primary endpoint was death at 5-year follow-up.  Also echocardiographic parameters at baseline and 5-year follow-up and rehospitalization rates were assessed. Results – A total of 139 patients were included: 92 (66.2%) with post-procedural residual MR ≤1+ and 47 (33.8%) with residual MR > 1+ (41 patients with residual MR 2+, 5 with residual MR 3+, 1 with residual MR 4+).  Comparable clinical and echocardiographic baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups except for NYHA functional class IV and implanted pace-maker (more frequent in patients with residual MR >1+) and previous myocardial infarction (more frequent  in patients with residual MR ≤1+). At 5-year follow-up, no significant differences were reported in the primary endpoint (49.6% in patients with residual MR ≤ 1+ vs. 65.3% in patients with residual MR > 1+, p 0.203) and in cardiac death (37.8% in patients with residual MR ≤ 1+ vs. 42.6% in patients with residual MR > 1+, p 0.921). Cox regression analysis identified residual MR > 1+ as an independent predictor of re-hospitalization (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.92, p =0.026). At 5-year follow-up,  a significant reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume was  observed in patients with residual MR ≤ 1+. Conclusions – At 5-year follow no significant differences in survival emerged in patients with severe  LV dysfunction undergoing MitraClip therapy regardless residual MR. Nevertheless residual MR > 1+ emerged as an indipendent predictor of re-hospitalization.

Mitral valve repair: Conventional open techniques

2018 ◽  
pp. 135-144
Author(s):  
A. Marc Gillinov ◽  
Tomislav Mihaljevic
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Left Ventricular Function ◽  
Ventricular Function ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Mechanical Prostheses ◽  
Surgical Option

Mitral valve repair is the preferred surgical option for nearly all patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) as its durability is widely recognized to be excellent. Advantages of mitral valve repair over mitral valve replacement include better preservation of left ventricular function, greater freedom from endocarditis and anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, and, in some cases, improved survival. Mitral valve repair has particular advantages in younger patients, who require lifelong anticoagulation if they receive mechanical prostheses. Mitral valve repair can be achieved in more than 90% of patients who have MR caused by prolapse. The forthcoming account includes an overview of the various techniques used in current practice.

scholarly journals Can We Predict Failure of Mitral Valve Repair?

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Gasser ◽  
Maria von Stumm ◽  
Christoph Sinning ◽  
Ulrich Schaefer ◽  
Hermann Reichenspurner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Mitral Valve Surgery ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Valve Surgery ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Redo Surgery ◽  
Valve Repair

Objective: To identify echocardiographic and surgical risk factors for failure after mitral valve repair. Methods: We identified a total of 77 consecutive patients from our institutional mitral valve surgery database who required redo mitral valve surgery due to recurrence of mitral regurgitation after primary mitral valve repair. A control group of 138 patients who had a stable echocardiographic long-term result was included based on propensity score matching. Systematic analysis of echocardiographic parameters was performed before primary surgery; after mitral valve repair and prior to redo surgery. Risk factor analysis was performed using multivariate Cox regression model. Results: Redo surgery was associated with the presence of pulmonary hypertension ≥ 50 mmHg (p = 0.02), a mean transmitral gradient > 5 mmHg (p = 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45% (p = 0.05) before surgery and mitral regurgitation ≥moderate at time of discharge (p = 0.002) in the whole cohort. Patients with functional mitral valve regurgitation had a higher tendency to undergo redo surgery if preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter exceeded 65 mm (p = 0.043) and if postoperative tenting height exceeded 6 mm (p = 0.018). Low ejection fraction was not significantly associated with the need for redo mitral valve surgery in the functional subgroup. Conclusions: Recurrent mitral regurgitation is still a valuable problem and is associated with relevant perioperative mortality. Patients with severe mitral regurgitation should undergo early mitral valve repair surgery as long as systolic pulmonary artery pressure is low, left ventricular ejection fraction is preserved, and LVEED is deceeds 65 mm.

Doppler-derived preoperative mitral regurgitation volume predicts postoperative left ventricular dysfunction after mitral valve repair

2009 ◽  
Vol 157 (5) ◽  
pp. 875-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuhiro Yamano ◽  
A. Marc Gillinov ◽  
Nozomi Wada ◽  
Yoshiki Matsumura ◽  
Manatomo Toyono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Left Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Valve Repair
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document