Sex Differences in Antidepressant Response in Recent Antidepressant Clinical Trials

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 318-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif Khan ◽  
Amy E. Brodhead ◽  
Kelly A. Schwartz ◽  
Russell L. Kolts ◽  
Walter A. Brown
2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s905-s905
Author(s):  
N. Kokras ◽  
C. Dalla

IntroductionSex differences in depression and antidepressant response in humans are modestly studied and results are controversial. Experimental studies using animal models may provide insights that could be useful in clinical trials.ObjectivesThe objective is to summarize findings from preclinical studies on sex differences and suggest how such preclinical research might be of use in clinical research.AimsSpecifically it is aimed to summarize evidence for both sexes in relation to the phenotype of depression, its endophenotype and the antidepressant response.MethodsA selection of experimental studies on sex differences in stress and antidepressant response was performed and their findings were linked to potential confounders or methodological issues that might obscure the results of clinical trials.ResultsIn preclinical studies, behavioral indices and models are adjusted for both sexes, in order to properly identify sex differences in primary outcomes. This is not routinely happening in clinical studies when using depression rating scales, which is the analogue of behavioral indices. Moreover, preclinical studies show sex differences at the baseline behavioral response and underlying mechanisms that often converge following antidepressant treatment. This is also a neglected issue in human studies. Finally, preclinical research suggests that when researching on potential biomarkers for depression and antidepressant response sex should be an important factor to consider.ConclusionsCautious exploitation of findings on sex differences from preclinical research could improve the design and quality of clinical studies for disease biomarkers and novel antidepressants and facilitate the drug development in a gender aware manner.Disclosure of interestNK has received honoraria and travel support from Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Sanofi-Aventis, Medochemie Generics and Elpen S.A. CD has received honoraria from Janssen-Cilag and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim. None of those is relevant to this study.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 834-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Rossello ◽  
João Pedro Ferreira ◽  
Stuart J. Pocock ◽  
John J.V. McMurray ◽  
Scott D. Solomon ◽  
...  

Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011216
Author(s):  
Daphne S. van Casteren ◽  
Tobias Kurth ◽  
A.H. Jan Danser ◽  
Gisela M. Terwindt ◽  
Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink

ObjectiveTo examine the effect of sex on clinical response to triptans and to determine whether these differences are related to pharmacokinetics of triptans in men and women, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched clinical trials distinguishing clinical response to or pharmacokinetic parameters of triptans between sexes in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science up to Dec 12, 2019. Analysis was based on data extracted from published reports. Male-to-female pooled risk ratios (RR) were calculated for clinical outcomes and pooled ratio of means (RoM) for pharmacokinetic outcomes, using random-effects models.ResultsOut of 1,188 publications on clinical trials with triptans, 244 were identified with sex-related search terms. Only 19 publications presented sex-specific results, comprising n = 2,280 men and n = 13,899 women. No sex differences were revealed for 2-hour headache and pain-free responses, but men had a lower risk for headache recurrence (male-to-female RR 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55–0.76, Q = 0.81) and adverse events (RR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72–0.93, Q = 4.93). Men had lower drug exposure with lower area under the curve (RoM 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60–0.81, Q = 18.06) and peak drug concentration (RoM 0.72, 95% CI: 0.64–0.82, Q = 8.24) than women.ConclusionsRemarkably few publications about sex differences in triptan response are available. The limited number of eligible studies show sex differences in adverse event frequency, which may be partly due to drug exposure differences. This higher drug exposure in women is not reflected in different response rates. Despite higher exposure, women have higher headache recurrence rates possibly due to longer attack duration related to sex hormonal changes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document