Stroke Sex Differences: From Basic Research to Clinical Trials

Author(s):  
Claire L. Gibson ◽  
Philip M. W. Bath ◽  
Raeed Altaee
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 813
Author(s):  
Isabel Fernandes ◽  
Cecília Melo-Alvim ◽  
Raquel Lopes-Brás ◽  
Miguel Esperança-Martins ◽  
Luís Costa

Osteosarcoma (OS) is a rare condition with very poor prognosis in a metastatic setting. Basic research has enabled a better understanding of OS pathogenesis and the discovery of new potential therapeutic targets. Phase I and II clinical trials are already ongoing, with some promising results for these patients. This article reviews OS pathogenesis and new potential therapeutic targets.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (21) ◽  
pp. 8390
Author(s):  
Antonio Martinez-Lopez ◽  
Trinidad Montero-Vilchez ◽  
Álvaro Sierra-Sánchez ◽  
Alejandro Molina-Leyva ◽  
Salvador Arias-Santiago

Alopecia is a challenging condition for both physicians and patients. Several topical, intralesional, oral, and surgical treatments have been developed in recent decades, but some of those therapies only provide partial improvement. Advanced medical therapies are medical products based on genes, cells, and/or tissue engineering products that have properties in regenerating, repairing, or replacing human tissue. In recent years, numerous applications have been described for advanced medical therapies. With this background, those therapies may have a role in the treatment of various types of alopecia such as alopecia areata and androgenic alopecia. The aim of this review is to provide dermatologists an overview of the different advanced medical therapies that have been applied in the treatment of alopecia, by reviewing clinical and basic research studies as well as ongoing clinical trials.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 351-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cong-Lin Liu ◽  
Junli Guo ◽  
Xian Zhang ◽  
Galina K. Sukhova ◽  
Peter Libby ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 319 (6) ◽  
pp. F1090-F1104
Author(s):  
Elinor C. Mannon ◽  
Paul M. O’Connor

Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) has been recognized as a possible therapy to target chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Several small clinical trials have demonstrated that supplementation with NaHCO3 or other alkalizing agents slows renal functional decline in patients with CKD. While the benefits of NaHCO3 treatment have been thought to result from restoring pH homeostasis, a number of studies have now indicated that NaHCO3 or other alkalis may provide benefit regardless of the presence of metabolic acidosis. These data have raised questions as to how NaHCO3 protects the kidneys. To date, the physiological mechanism(s) that mediates the reported protective effect of NaHCO3 in CKD remain unclear. In this review, we first examine the evidence from clinical trials in support of a beneficial effect of NaHCO3 and other alkali in slowing kidney disease progression and their relationship to acid-base status. Then, we discuss the physiological pathways that have been proposed to underlie these renoprotective effects and highlight strengths and weaknesses in the data supporting each pathway. Finally, we discuss how answering key questions regarding the physiological mechanism(s) mediating the beneficial actions of NaHCO3 therapy in CKD is likely to be important in the design of future clinical trials. We conclude that basic research in animal models is likely to be critical in identifying the physiological mechanisms underlying the benefits of NaHCO3 treatment in CKD. Gaining an understanding of these pathways may lead to the improved implementation of NaHCO3 as a therapy in CKD and perhaps other disease states.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 834-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Rossello ◽  
João Pedro Ferreira ◽  
Stuart J. Pocock ◽  
John J.V. McMurray ◽  
Scott D. Solomon ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay Pradhan ◽  
Per-Erik Olsson

Abstract Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has shown high infection and mortality rates all over the world, and despite the global efforts, there is so far no specific therapy available for COVID-19. Interestingly, while the severity and mortality of COVID-19 are higher in males than in females, the underlying molecular mechanisms are unclear. In this review, we explore sex-related differences that may be contributing factors to the observed male-biased mortality from COVID-19. Males are considered the weaker sex in aspects related to endurance and infection control. Studies show that viral RNA clearance is delayed in males with COVID-19. A recent study has indicated that the testis can harbor coronavirus, and consequently, males show delayed viral clearance. However, the role of testis involvement in COVID-19 severity and mortality needs further research. Males and females show a distinct difference in immune system responses with females eliciting stronger immune responses to pathogens. This difference in immune system responses may be a major contributing factor to viral load, disease severity, and mortality. In addition, differences in sex hormone milieus could also be a determinant of viral infections as estrogen has immunoenhancing effects while testosterone has immunosuppressive effects. The sex-specific severity of COVID-19 infections indicates that further research on understanding the sex differences is needed. Inclusion of both males and females in basic research and clinical trials is required to provide critical information on sex-related differences that may help to better understand disease outcome and therapy.


Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011216
Author(s):  
Daphne S. van Casteren ◽  
Tobias Kurth ◽  
A.H. Jan Danser ◽  
Gisela M. Terwindt ◽  
Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink

ObjectiveTo examine the effect of sex on clinical response to triptans and to determine whether these differences are related to pharmacokinetics of triptans in men and women, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched clinical trials distinguishing clinical response to or pharmacokinetic parameters of triptans between sexes in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science up to Dec 12, 2019. Analysis was based on data extracted from published reports. Male-to-female pooled risk ratios (RR) were calculated for clinical outcomes and pooled ratio of means (RoM) for pharmacokinetic outcomes, using random-effects models.ResultsOut of 1,188 publications on clinical trials with triptans, 244 were identified with sex-related search terms. Only 19 publications presented sex-specific results, comprising n = 2,280 men and n = 13,899 women. No sex differences were revealed for 2-hour headache and pain-free responses, but men had a lower risk for headache recurrence (male-to-female RR 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55–0.76, Q = 0.81) and adverse events (RR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72–0.93, Q = 4.93). Men had lower drug exposure with lower area under the curve (RoM 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60–0.81, Q = 18.06) and peak drug concentration (RoM 0.72, 95% CI: 0.64–0.82, Q = 8.24) than women.ConclusionsRemarkably few publications about sex differences in triptan response are available. The limited number of eligible studies show sex differences in adverse event frequency, which may be partly due to drug exposure differences. This higher drug exposure in women is not reflected in different response rates. Despite higher exposure, women have higher headache recurrence rates possibly due to longer attack duration related to sex hormonal changes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document