scholarly journals Professional E-mail Communication Among Health Care Providers

2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Terez Malka ◽  
Chad S. Kessler ◽  
John Abraham ◽  
Thomas W. Emmet ◽  
Lee Wilbur
2001 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 566-573
Author(s):  
Peggy Soule Odegard ◽  
Mikell Goe

Collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) is a method for developing a patient-centered practice in which the pharmacist's activities are integrated with those of other health care providers. The goals of this continuing feature are to refine the concept of CDTM and provide patient-care applications from the authors' experience in Washington state. Questions or suggestions should be addressed to Timothy S. Fuller, FASHP, Fuller and Associates, 1948 Boyer Avenue East, Seattle, WA 98112-2924 (tel.206-860-8308). E-mail: [email protected]


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-399
Author(s):  
PETER TARCZY-HORNOCH

The neonatology list server NICU-Net was created over a year ago at the University of Washington as an international forum for neonatologists and other neonatal health care providers. The stated purpose was discussion of neonatal issues such as: recently published trials and recommendations, proposed or ongoing multicenter trials, dilemmas in diagnosis, management and ethics, and the effects of health care reform on neonatology. Much like the forums of Rome, NICU-Net was intended to be a "place" of public assembly for discussion and debate. To allow access to the greatest number of potential users, it was set up as a mailing list server that allows anybody with Internet electronic mail (E-mail) access to participate.


2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (6_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 67-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra Revere ◽  
Ian Painter ◽  
Mark Oberle ◽  
Janet G. Baseman

Objective. The Rapid Emergency Alert Communication in Health (REACH) Trial was a randomized control trial to systematically compare and evaluate the effectiveness of traditional and mobile communication modalities for public health agencies to disseminate time-sensitive information to health-care providers (HCPs). We conducted a sub-study to identify the communication channels by which HCPs preferred receiving public health alerts and advisories. Methods. Enrolled HCPs were blindly randomized into four message delivery groups to receive time-sensitive public health messages by e-mail, fax, or short message service (SMS) or to a no-message control group. Follow-up interviews were conducted 5–10 days after the message. In the final interview, additional questions were asked regarding HCP preferences for receiving public health alerts and advisories. We examined the relationship between key covariates and preferred method of receiving public health alert and advisory messages. Results. Gender, age, provider type, and study site showed statistically significant associations with delivery method preference. Older providers were more likely than younger providers to prefer e-mail or fax, while younger providers were more likely than older providers to prefer receiving messages via SMS. Conclusions. There is currently no evidence-based research to guide or improve communication between public health agencies and HCPs. Understanding the preferences of providers for receiving alerts and advisories may improve the effectiveness of vital public health communications systems and, in turn, may enhance disease surveillance, aid in early detection, and improve case finding and situational awareness for public health emergencies.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany B. Kindratt ◽  
Marlyn Allicock ◽  
Folefac Atem ◽  
Florence J. Dallo ◽  
Bijal A. Balasubramanian

BACKGROUND The growth of electronic medical records and patient portal use have allowed for patients and health care providers to communicate by e-mail and direct messaging between health care visits. E-mail patient-provider communication (PPC) may enhance traditional face-to-face PPC by allowing patients to ask questions, receive clear explanations, engage in shared-decision making, and confirm understanding in between in-person visits. Despite increasing trends in the use of e-mail patient-provider communication (PPC) since the early 2000s, few studies have evaluated associations between e-mail PPC and preventive services uptake. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to determine associations between e-mail PPC use and adults’ likelihood of receiving breast, cervical, and colon cancer screenings. METHODS Secondary, cross-sectional data from the 2011-2015 National Health Interview Survey were combined and analyzed (n=68,691). For each cancer screening, inclusion criteria were based on the age of screening recommendations and no prior history of the cancer screening of interest. The independent variable was whether adults used e-mail PPC in the past 12 months (yes or no). The dependent variables were whether: 1) women received a mammogram in the past 12 months (ages >40 years); 2) women received a Pap test in the past 12 months (ages 21-65 years); and 3) adults received a colon cancer screening in the past 12 months (ages >50 years). Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS Adults who reported receiving all cancer screenings in the past 12 months were more likely to be non-Hispanic white, married/live with a partner, have a bachelor’s degree or higher level of education, have health insurance coverage and perceive their health as excellent, very good or good (all p’s<.001). Men were more likely to receive colon cancer screenings than women (p<.0001). In multivariable logistic regression models, women who used e-mail to communicate with their health care providers had greater odds of receiving breast (OR=1.38; 95% CI=1.26-1.50) and cervical (OR=1.10; 95% CI=1.02-1.20) cancer screenings compared to women who did not use e-mail PPC. Adults who used e-mail to communicate with their health care providers had 1.55 times greater odds (95% CI=1.42-1.69) of receiving a colon cancer screening compared to those who did not use e-mail PPC. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate that more patient engagement through health information technology for communication with health care providers may improve adults’ likelihood of receiving preventive services, particularly breast, cervical, and colon cancer screenings. More research is needed to examine other factors related to the reasons for and quality of e-mail PPC between patients and health care providers and determine avenues for health education and intervention.


1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-203
Author(s):  
Kendra Carlson

The Supreme Court of California held, in Delaney v. Baker, 82 Cal. Rptr. 2d 610 (1999), that the heightened remedies available under the Elder Abuse Act (Act), Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 15657,15657.2 (West 1998), apply to health care providers who engage in reckless neglect of an elder adult. The court interpreted two sections of the Act: (1) section 15657, which provides for enhanced remedies for reckless neglect; and (2) section 15657.2, which limits recovery for actions based on “professional negligence.” The court held that reckless neglect is distinct from professional negligence and therefore the restrictions on remedies against health care providers for professional negligence are inapplicable.Kay Delaney sued Meadowood, a skilled nursing facility (SNF), after a resident, her mother, died. Evidence at trial indicated that Rose Wallien, the decedent, was left lying in her own urine and feces for extended periods of time and had stage I11 and IV pressure sores on her ankles, feet, and buttocks at the time of her death.


Author(s):  
Pauline A. Mashima

Important initiatives in health care include (a) improving access to services for disadvantaged populations, (b) providing equal access for individuals with limited or non-English proficiency, and (c) ensuring cultural competence of health-care providers to facilitate effective services for individuals from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health, 2001). This article provides a brief overview of the use of technology by speech-language pathologists and audiologists to extend their services to underserved populations who live in remote geographic areas, or when cultural and linguistic differences impact service delivery.


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
Lynn Chatfield ◽  
Sandra Christos ◽  
Michael McGregor

In a changing economy and a changing industry, health care providers need to complete thorough, comprehensive, and efficient assessments that provide both an accurate depiction of the patient's deficits and a blueprint to the path of treatment for older adults. Through standardized testing and observations as well as the goals and evidenced-based treatment plans we have devised, health care providers can maximize outcomes and the functional levels of patients. In this article, we review an interdisciplinary assessment that involves speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, physical therapy, and respiratory therapy to work with older adults in health care settings. Using the approach, we will examine the benefits of collaboration between disciplines, an interdisciplinary screening process, and the importance of sharing information from comprehensive discipline-specific evaluations. We also will discuss the importance of having an understanding of the varied scopes of practice, the utilization of outcome measurement tools, and a patient-centered assessment approach to care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document