scholarly journals The Underrepresented, Low Income, and First Time (UpLIFT) Project: A Comprehensive, Open-Access Guide to Medical School Admissions Aimed to Increase Educational Equity for Underrepresented Premedical Students

2021 ◽  
Vol 96 (11S) ◽  
pp. S191-S192
Author(s):  
Eric Li ◽  
Cheyenne Williams ◽  
Michaela Hitchner ◽  
K. Charlotte Lee ◽  
Hasan Ahmad ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-189
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Zisk

AbstractThe tremendous toll that COVID-19 has taken on this country’s minority population is the most recent reminder of the health disparities between people of color and people who classify themselves as white. There are many reasons for these disparities, but one that gets less attention than it deserves is the lack of physicians of color available to treat patients of color.


2014 ◽  
Vol 89 (12) ◽  
pp. 1657-1663
Author(s):  
David A. Cort ◽  
Emory Morrison

MedEdPublish ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pathiyil Ravi Shankar ◽  
Gabriel Dakubo ◽  
Satyajit Patra ◽  
Ramanan Balasubramanium

Author(s):  
Katherine Girgulis ◽  
Andrea Rideout ◽  
Mohsin Rashid

Background: Diversity in medical schools has lagged behind Canada’s growing multicultural population. Dalhousie medical school allows Black and Indigenous applicants to self-identify. We examined how these applicants performed and progressed through the admissions process compared to Other group (applicants who did not self-identify). Methods: Retrospective analysis of four application cycles (2015-2019) was conducted, comparing demographic data, scores for application components (Computer-Based Assessment for Sampling Personal Characteristics (CASPer), MCAT, GPA, supplemental, discretionary, Multiple Mini Interview (MMI)), and final application status between the three groups. Results: Of 1322 applicants, 104 identified as Black, 64 Indigenous, and 1154 Other. GPA was higher in the Other compared to the Indigenous group (p < 0.001). CASPer score was higher in the Other compared to the Black group (p = 0.047). There was no difference between groups for all other application components. A large proportion of Black and Indigenous applicants had incomplete applications. Acceptance rates were similar between all groups. Black applicants declined an admission offer substantially more than expected (31%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Black and Indigenous applicants who completed their application progressed well through the admissions process. The pool of diverse applicants needs to be increased and support provided for completion of applications. Further study is warranted to understand why qualified applicants decline acceptance.


2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (9) ◽  
pp. 722-727
Author(s):  
Toby Keys ◽  
Mark H. Ryan ◽  
Sharon Dobie ◽  
David Satin ◽  
David V. Evans

Background and Objectives: Direct pharmaceutical marketing to physicians by pharmaceutical representatives is effective in changing behavior of health care providers, resulting in less evidence-based prescribing. Although much has been written about pharmaceutical marketing exposures among medical students, less is known about direct marketing exposures before students matriculate. This study examined the types of pharmaceutical representative direct marketing exposures for premedical students and where they occurred. Methods: From June to August of 2017, researchers surveyed students who accepted admission to US public medical schools. These prematriculated students completed our survey just prior to matriculation. The survey inquired about whether the students were exposed to pharmaceutical marketing directly from pharmaceutical salespeople, the types of marketing they observed or received, and where these interactions occurred. Results: Survey participants included 911 prematriculated students from 14 of the 188 medical schools invited to participate. Seventy-one percent (646) of the participants received or observed someone receiving pharmaceutical marketing gifts, small meals or snacks, articles, or samples. The two most common contexts for direct pharmaceutical marketing exposures were during shadowing experiences (54%, 346) and during employment (50%, 323). Conclusions: The findings suggest that it may be common for medical students to have interacted directly with pharmaceutical salespeople or observed other health professionals in these interactions before they matriculate in medical school. Because many of these interactions occur during clinical experiences required by institutions for admission, medical schools and premedical associations should consider delivering conflict-of-interest education early in medical school education or before students matriculate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document