scholarly journals Norepinephrine Infusion for Preventing Postspinal Anesthesia Hypotension during Cesarean Delivery

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed M. Hasanin ◽  
Sarah M. Amin ◽  
Nora A. Agiza ◽  
Mohamed K. Elsayed ◽  
Sherin Refaat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Norepinephrine Infusion ◽  
Double Blinded ◽  
Intraoperative Hypertension

Abstract EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE What We Already Know about This Topic Hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery is common, usually treated with phenylephrine or ephedrine Norepinephrine was recently introduced in obstetric anesthesia but the optimal dose is unknown What This Article Tells Us That Is New This randomized, double-blinded trial compared prophylactic norepinephrine infusions of 0.025, 0.050, or 0.075 μg · kg-1 · min-1, started after bupivacaine spinal anesthesia, in full-term parturients having elective cesarean delivery The primary outcome, maternal hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 80% of baseline), occurred less frequently after both 0.050 and 0.075 μg · kg-1 · min-1 compared 0.025 μg · kg-1 · min-1 norepinephrine Background Norepinephrine has been recently introduced for prophylaxis against postspinal hypotension during cesarean delivery; however, no data are available regarding its optimum dose. The objective of this study is to compare three infusion rates of norepinephrine for prophylaxis against postspinal hypotension during cesarean delivery. Methods The authors conducted a double-blinded, randomized, controlled study including full-term pregnant women scheduled for cesarean delivery. Norepinephrine infusion was commenced after subarachnoid block. Patients were randomized into three groups, which received norepinephrine with starting infusion rates of 0.025 μg · kg-1 · min-1, 0.050 μg · kg-1 · min-1, and 0.075 μg · kg-1 · min-1. Infusion was stopped when intraoperative hypertension occurred. The primary outcome was the frequency of postspinal hypotension (defined as decreased systolic blood pressure less than 80% of the baseline reading). The three groups were compared according to the following: systolic blood pressure, heart rate, frequency of intraoperative hypertension, frequency of bradycardia, and neonatal outcomes. Results Two hundred eighty-four mothers were included in the analysis. The frequency of postspinal hypotension was lower for both the 0.050-μg · kg-1 · min-1 dose group (23/93 [24.7%], odds ratio: 0.45 [95% CI: 0.24 to 0.82], P = 0.014) and the 0.075-μg · kg-1 · min-1 dose group (25/96 [26.0%], odds ratio: 0.48 [95% CI:0.26 to 0.89], P = 0.022) compared with the 0.025-μg · kg-1 · min-1 dose group (40/95 [42.1%]). The two higher-dose groups (the 0.050-μg · kg-1 · min-1 group and the 0.075-μg · kg-1 · min-1 group) had higher systolic blood pressure and lower heart rate compared with the 0.025 μg · kg-1 · min-1 group. The three groups were comparable in the frequency of intraoperative hypertension, incidence of bradycardia, and neonatal outcomes. Conclusions Both the 0.050-μg · kg-1 · min-1 and 0.075-μg · kg-1 · min-1 norepinephrine infusion rates effectively reduced postspinal hypotension during cesarean delivery compared with the 0.025-μg · kg-1 · min-1 infusion rate.

Randomized Double-blinded Comparison of Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine for Maintenance of Blood Pressure during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

2015 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 736-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warwick D. Ngan Kee ◽  
Shara W. Y. Lee ◽  
Floria F. Ng ◽  
Perpetua E. Tan ◽  
Kim S. Khaw
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Adrenergic Receptor ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Computer Controlled ◽  
Double Blinded

Abstract Background: During spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, phenylephrine can cause reflexive decreases in maternal heart rate and cardiac output. Norepinephrine has weak β-adrenergic receptor agonist activity in addition to potent α-adrenergic receptor activity and therefore may be suitable for maintaining blood pressure with less negative effects on heart rate and cardiac output compared with phenylephrine. Methods: In a randomized, double-blinded study, 104 healthy patients having cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomized to have systolic blood pressure maintained with a computer-controlled infusion of norepinephrine 5 μg/ml or phenylephrine 100 μg/ml. The primary outcome compared was cardiac output. Blood pressure heart rate and neonatal outcome were also compared. Results: Normalized cardiac output 5 min after induction was greater in the norepinephrine group versus the phenylephrine group (median 102.7% [interquartile range, 94.3 to 116.7%] versus 93.8% [85.0 to 103.1%], P = 0.004, median difference 9.8%, 95% CI of difference between medians 2.8 to 16.1%). From induction until uterine incision, for norepinephrine versus phenylephrine, systolic blood pressure and stroke volume were similar, heart rate and cardiac output were greater, systemic vascular resistance was lower, and the incidence of bradycardia was smaller. Neonatal outcome was similar between groups. Conclusions: When given by computer-controlled infusion during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, norepinephrine was effective for maintaining blood pressure and was associated with greater heart rate and cardiac output compared with phenylephrine. Further work would be of interest to confirm the safety and efficacy of norepinephrine as a vasopressor in obstetric patients.

scholarly journals Variable versus fixed-rate infusion of phenylephrine during cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Hasanin ◽  
Sara Habib ◽  
Yaser Abdelwahab ◽  
Mohamed Elsayad ◽  
Maha Mostafa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Lower Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Phenylephrine Infusion ◽  
Infusion Regimen

Abstract Background Phenylephrine is the most commonly used vasopressor for prophylaxis against maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery; however, the best regimen for its administration is not well established. Although variable infusion protocols had been suggested for phenylephrine infusion, evidence-based evaluation of variable infusion regimens are lacking. The aim of this work is to compare variable infusion, fixed on-and-off infusion, and intermittent boluses of phenylephrine for prophylaxis against maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery. Methods A randomized controlled study was conducted, including full-term pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. Participants were divided into three groups which received phenylephrine by either intermittent boluses (1.5 mcg/Kg phenylephrine), fixed on-and-off infusion (with a dose of 0.75 mcg/Kg/min), or variable infusion (with a starting dose of 0.75 mcg/Kg/min). The three groups were compared with regard to frequency of: maternal hypotension (primary outcome), second episode hypotension, reactive hypertension, and bradycardia. Other outcomes included heart rate, systolic blood pressure, physician interventions, and neonatal outcomes. Results Two-hundred and seventeen mothers were available for final analysis. The 2 infusion groups showed less incidence of maternal hypotension {26/70 (37%), 22/71 (31%), and (51/76 (67%)} and higher incidence of reactive hypertension compared to the intermittent boluses group without significant differences between the two former groups. The number of physician interventions was highest in the variable infusion group compared to the other two groups. The intermittent boluses group showed lower systolic blood pressure and higher heart rate compared to the two infusion groups; whilst the two later groups were comparable. Conclusion Both phenylephrine infusion regimens equally prevented maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery compared to intermittent boluses regimen. Due to higher number of physician interventions in the variable infusion regimen, the current recommendations which favor this regimen over fixed infusion regimen might need re-evaluation.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Labetalol and Nitroglycerin for The Management of Intraoperative Hypertension in Ambulatory Surgical Patients Who Underwent Cataract Surgery

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Sanatkar ◽  
Hossein Sadrossadat ◽  
Mehrdad Goudarzi ◽  
Ebrahim Espahbod ◽  
Masoumeh Zangeneh
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Topical Anesthesia ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Baseline Heart Rate ◽  
Repeat Dose ◽  
Hypotension Episode ◽  
Intraoperative Hypertension

Background: This is a prospective randomized blinded clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of labetalol and nitroglycerin for the management of intraoperative hypertension in ambulatory surgical patients who underwent cataract surgery. Methods: A total of 80 hypertensive patients (systolic blood pressure> 200 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure>100 mmHg) who had increased blood pressure during cataract surgery under topical anesthesia were reviewed. Patients were randomized to receive nitroglycerin (group N, n=40) or labetalol (group L, n=40). The initial dose of nitroglycerin was a bolus of 2 µg/kg and repeat dose of 1ug/kg intravenously every 5 minutes. Labetalol was administered as a bolus of 5 mg followed by 5 mg intravenously as needed every five minutes up to maximum dose of 1 mg/kg. Results: Systolic blood pressure decreased from 21.4±8.6 mm Hg (200 to 260 mm Hg) to 18.8±6.4 mm Hg with administration of nitroglycerin. Labetalol reduced systolic blood pressure from 21.4±6.7 mm Hg (201 to 258 mm Hg) to 17.6±11.6 (p=0.02). Nitroglycerin increased baseline heart rate from 68±8 beats/min to 82±6 beats/min (p=0.04), however, in the labetalol group heart rate reduced from control 72±6 to 64±9 beats/min (P<0.05). The hypotension episode was 18 (45%) cases in the nitroglycerin group and 2 (5%) cases in the labetalol group respectively (p<0.05). The mean of systolic blood pressure during their stay in the recovery room in nitroglycerin group was 20.7±9.6 mm Hg and in labetalol group was 18.5±10.2 mm Hg (p<0.05). Conclusion: Nitroglycerin may produce reflex tachycardia and episode of hypotension especially in elderly patients intraoperatively. Labetalol is a safe and effective antihypertensive agent for management of increased blood pressure during cataract surgery with topical anesthesia.

Prophylactic Angiotensin II Infusion during Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery 

1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 1475-1479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Vincent ◽  
Carol F. Werhan ◽  
Patricia F. Norman ◽  
Grace H. Shih ◽  
David H. Chestnut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Elective Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Maternal Heart Rate ◽  
Elective Cesarean

Background Angiotensin II may prove useful in treating regional anesthesia-induced hypotension in obstetric patients, because it causes less uterine vasoconstriction than do other vasoconstrictor drugs (such as phenylephrine). This study compared (1) maternal blood pressure and heart rate and (2) fetal status at delivery in parturients given either prophylactic angiotensin II or ephedrine infusion during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Methods Fifty-four women were randomized to receive either angiotensin II or ephedrine infusion intravenously during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section delivery. Simultaneous with subarachnoid injection, infusion of angiotensin II (2.5 microg/ml) or ephedrine (5 mg/ml) was initiated at 10 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1) and 50 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), respectively. The rate of each infusion was adjusted to maintain maternal systolic blood pressure at 90-100% of baseline. Results Cumulative vasopressor doses (mean+/-SD) through 10, 20, and 30 min were 150+/-100, 310+/-180, and 500+/-320 ng/kg in the angiotensin group and 480+/-210, 660+/-390, and 790+/-640 microg/kg in the ephedrine group. Maternal heart rate was significantly higher (P &lt; 0.001) during vasopressor infusion in the ephedrine group than in the angiotensin group. Umbilical arterial and venous blood pH and base excess were all significantly higher (P &lt; 0.05) in the angiotensin group than in the ephedrine group. Conclusions Angiotensin II infusion maintained maternal systolic blood pressure during spinal anesthesia without increasing maternal heart rate or causing fetal acidosis.

Comparison of Adenosine and Remifentanil Infusions as Adjuvants to Desflurane Anesthesia 

1999 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 956-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Zarate ◽  
Monica M. Sa Rego ◽  
Paul F. White ◽  
Larry Duffy ◽  
Vance E. Shearer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Nitrous Oxide ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Opioid Analgesic ◽  
Opioid Analgesics ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Intraoperative Period ◽  
Double Blinded

Background Because adenosine has been alleged to produce both anesthetic and analgesic sparing effects, a randomized, double-blinded study was designed to compare the perioperative effects of adenosine and remifentanil when administered as intravenous adjuvants during general anesthesia for major gynecologic procedures. Methods Thirty-two women were assigned randomly to one of two drug treatment groups. After premedication with 0.04 mg/kg intravenous midazolam, anesthesia was induced with 2 micro/kg intravenous fentanyl, 1.5 mg/kg intravenous propofol, and 0.6 mg/kg intravenous rocuronium, and maintained with desflurane, 2%, and nitrous oxide, 65%, in oxygen. Before skin incision, an infusion of either remifentanil (0.02 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or adenosine (25 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) was started and subsequently titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure, heart rate, or both within 10-15% of the preincision values. Results Adenosine and remifentanil infusions were effective anesthetic adjuvants during lower abdominal surgery. Use of adenosine (mean +/- SEM, 166+/-17 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) was associated with a significantly greater decrease in systolic blood pressure and higher heart rate values compared with remifentanil (mean +/- SEM, 0.2+/-0.03 microg kg(-1) x min(-1)). Total postoperative opioid analgesic use was 45% and 27% lower in the adenosine group at 0-2 h and 2-24 h after surgery, respectively. Conclusions Adjunctive use of a variable-rate infusion of adenosine during desflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia was associated with acceptable hemodynamic stability during the intraoperative period. Compared with remifentanil, intraoperative use of adenosine was associated with a decreased requirement for opioid analgesics during the first 24 h after operation.

scholarly journals Comparison of Analgesic Effects of Intravenous or Rectal Acetaminophen for Controlling Post-Tonsillectomy Pain

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Mahin Seyedhejazi ◽  
Yalda Jabbari Moghaddam ◽  
Daryoush Sheikhzadeh ◽  
Mojtab Sohrabpour ◽  
Nasrin Taghizadieh
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Recovery Room ◽  
Endotracheal Tubes ◽  
Analgesic Effects ◽  
Face Pain ◽  
Intravenous Acetaminophen ◽  
Double Blinded

Background: Acetaminophen is a simple analgesic and antipyretic administered in varied formats and from different routes. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of intravenous (IV) and rectal acetaminophen (RA) for controlling post-tonsillectomy pain. Methods: In a double-blinded randomized clinical trial, 70 children scheduled for adenotonsillectomy were randomly allocated into two groups, each containing 35 patients.In the first group, 40 mg/kg of rectal acetaminophen and in the second group, 15 mg/kg of IV acetaminophen was administered at the end of surgery before extubation. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were measured every 15 minutes after intubation. Face pain score was recorded for every 30 minutes between extubation and discharge from recovery room. The data from both groups were analyzed using SPSS program. Results: All demographic findings (age, gender and weight), the size of used endotracheal tubes, initial heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were comparable in both groups.The pain intensity was reduced in both groups. But this decrease was more prominent in the group who received IV acetaminophen (P=0.006). The changes in systolic blood pressure were not significant in both groups, as well as the changes in systolic blood pressure in recovery room and the ward. Diastolic blood pressure increased both in the recovery room and the ward. The changes were not significant in the ward; whereas, the changes in diastolic blood pressure in recovery room were statistically significant (P=0.008). Heart rate decreased significantly both in the recovery room (P=0.001) and in the ward (P=0.002). Conclusion: Intravenous acetaminophen is more effective than rectal acetaminophen for attenuating post adenotonsillectomy pain in children.

scholarly journals Association between Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Arterial Stiffness in Children with Congenital Heart Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3266
Author(s):  
Laura Willinger ◽  
Leon Brudy ◽  
Renate Oberhoffer-Fritz ◽  
Peter Ewert ◽  
Jan Müller
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Congenital Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Arterial Stiffness ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Z Score ◽  
Objectively Measured

Background: The association between physical activity (PA) and arterial stiffness is particularly important in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) who are at risk for arterial stiffening. The aim of this study was to examine the association between objectively measured PA and arterial stiffness in children and adolescents with CHD. Methods: In 387 children and adolescents with various CHD (12.2 ± 3.3 years; 162 girls) moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) was assessed with the “Garmin vivofit jr.” for 7 consecutive days. Arterial stiffness parameters including pulse wave velocity (PWV) and central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) were non-invasively assessed by oscillometric measurement via Mobil-O-Graph®. Results: MVPA was not associated with PWV (ß = −0.025, p = 0.446) and cSBP (ß = −0.020, p = 0.552) in children with CHD after adjusting for age, sex, BMI z-score, peripheral systolic blood pressure, heart rate and hypertensive agents. Children with CHD were remarkably active with 80% of the study population reaching the WHO recommendation of average 60 min of MVPA per day. Arterial stiffness did not differ between low-active and high-active CHD group after adjusting for age, sex, BMI z-score, peripheral systolic blood pressure, heart rate and hypertensive agents (PWV: F = 0.530, p = 0.467; cSBP: F = 0.843, p = 0.359). Conclusion: In this active cohort, no association between PA and arterial stiffness was found. Longer exposure to the respective risk factors of physical inactivity might be necessary to determine an impact of PA on the vascular system.

scholarly journals FRI0618-HPR EFFECTS OF MUSIC THERAPY ON PAIN, ANXIETY, AND VITAL SIGNS IN CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES PATIENTS DURING BIOLOGICAL DRUGS INFUSION

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 914.2-914
Author(s):  
S. Boussaid ◽  
M. Ben Majdouba ◽  
S. Jriri ◽  
M. Abbes ◽  
S. Jammali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Music Therapy ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Respiratory Rate ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Biological Therapies ◽  
Biological Drugs ◽  
Pain Anxiety ◽  
The Mean

Background:Music therapy is based on ancient cross-cultural beliefs that music can have a “healing” effect on mind and body. Research determined that listening to music can increase comfort and relaxation, relieve pain, lower distress, reduce anxiety, improve positive emotions and mood, and decrease psychological symptoms. Music therapy has been used greatly in various medical procedures to reduce associated anxiety and pain. Patients have a high level of anxiety when they are in the hospital, this is the case of patients with rheumatic diseases who consult regularly to have intravenous infusion of biological therapies.Objectives:The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of music therapy on pain, anxiety, and vital signs among patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases during intravenous infusion of biological drugs.Methods:Fifty patients were divided into two groups: The experimental group G1 (n=25) received drug infusion while lestening to soft music (30 minutes); and the control group G2 (n=25) received only drug infusion. Measures include pain, anxiety, vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate). The pain was measured using visual analogic scale (VAS). The state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) was used for measuring anxiety, low anxiety ranges from 20 to 39, the moderate anxiety ranges from 40 to 59, and high anxiety ranges from 60 to 80. Vital signs (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], heart rate [HR], and respiratory rate [RR]) were measured before, during and immediately after the infusion.Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) was used for analysis.Results:The mean age in G1 was 44.45 years (26-72) with a sex ratio (M/F) of 0.8. Including the 25 patients, 12 had rheumatoid arthritis, 10 had ankylosing spondylitis and 3 had psoriatic arthritis. The mean disease duration was 8 years. In G2, the mean age was 46 years (25-70) with a sex ratio (M/F) of 0.75, 12 had rheumatoid arthritis, 11 had ankylosing spondylitis and 2 had psoriatic arthritis. The mean disease duration was 7.5 years. The biological drugs used were: Infliximab in 30 cases, Tocilizumab in 12 cases and Rituximab in 8 cases.Before the infusion, the patients of experimental group had a mean VAS of 5/10±3, a mean STAI of 50.62±6.01, a mean SBP of 13.6 cmHg±1.4, a mean DBP of 8.6 cmHg±1, a mean HR of 85±10 and a mean RR of 18±3. While in control group the mean VAS was 5.5±2, the mean STAI was 50.89±5.5, the mean SBP was 13.4±1.2, the mean DBP was 8.8±1.1, the mean HR was 82±8 and the mean RR was 19±2.During the infusion and after music intervention in G1, the mean STAI became 38.35±5 in G1 versus 46.7±5.2 in G2 (p value=0.022), the mean SBP became 12.1±0.5 in G1 versus 13±1 in G2 (p=0.035), the mean DBP became 8.1±0.8 in G1 versus 8.4±0.9 in G2 (p=0.4), the mean HR became 76±9 in G1 versus 78±7 in G2 (p=0.04) and the mean RR became 17.3±2.1 in G1 versus 18.2±1.7 in G2 (p=0.39).This study found a statistically significant decrease in anxiety, systolic blood pressure and heart rate in patients receiving music interventions during biological therapies infusion, but no significant difference were identified in diastolic blood pressure and respiratory rate.Conclusion:The findings provide further evidence to support the use of music therapy to reduce anxiety, and lower systolic blood pressure and heart rate in patients with rheumatic disease during biological therapies infusion.References:[1] Lin, C., Hwang, S., Jiang, P., & Hsiung, N. (2019).Effect of Music Therapy on Pain After Orthopedic Surgery -A Systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Practice.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document