Reherniation and Failure After Lumbar Discectomy: A Comparison of Fragment Excision Alone Versus Subtotal Discectomy

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 316-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn D. Wera ◽  
Clayton L. Dean ◽  
Uri M. Ahn ◽  
Randall E. Marcus ◽  
Ezequiel H. Cassinelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Fragment Excision

P40. Reherniation and Failure Following Lumbar Discectomy: A Comparison of Fragment Excision Alone versus Subtotal Discectomy

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 103S
Author(s):  
Glenn Wera ◽  
Clayton Dean ◽  
Uri Ahn ◽  
Ezequiel Cassinelli ◽  
David Hart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Fragment Excision

PEID (Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy): Cautionary Points Based on the Evidence

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Jun Ho Lee
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Operative Indication ◽  
Endoscopic Techniques ◽  
Bone Removal ◽  
Iatrogenic Trauma ◽  
Minimal Damage ◽  
Surgical Modality ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is one of the most sophisticated operative procedures for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Endoscopic techniques are now becoming standard in many areas due to expanded technical possibilities of full-endoscopic transforaminal or interlaminar resection of herniated lumbar discs as well as stenosis. However conventional percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) disc operations may sometimes result in subsequent untoward complications due to unnoticed iatrogenic trauma to neural structures, which is mostly related to an anatomical limitation during endoscope insertion.Methods: An appropriate operative indication of the PEID without bone removal or laminectomy can be used to treat LDH cases with an enough interlaminar space (at least ≥ 20 mm by bi-facetal distance) from the reported evidences. Otherwise, there might be several indications for requirement of bone removal; a narrow interlaminar space, disappearance of the concave shape of the upper vertebral laminae, high-grade migration of LDH, recurrent LDH, obesity, or an immobile nerve root.Conclusion: The significance of PEID lies also in its minimal damage to surrounding structures such as muscle, bone, and ligaments. A discrete radiographic evaluation from the patient preoperatively is mandatory before choosing a proper endoscopic surgical modality for the sake of optimal clinical outcome after PEID. 

Association of time to surgery with leg pain after lumbar discectomy: is delayed surgery detrimental?

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Siccoli ◽  
Victor E. Staartjes ◽  
Marlies P. de Wispelaere ◽  
Marc L. Schröder
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Specific Method ◽  
Time To Surgery ◽  
Patient Reported

OBJECTIVEWhile it has been established that lumbar discectomy should only be performed after a certain waiting period unless neurological deficits are present, little is known about the association of late surgery with outcome. Using data from a prospective registry, the authors aimed to quantify the association of time to surgery (TTS) with leg pain outcome after lumbar discectomy and to identify a maximum TTS cutoff anchored to the minimum clinically important difference (MCID).METHODSTTS was defined as the time from the onset of leg pain caused by radiculopathy to the time of surgery in weeks. MCID was defined as a minimum 30% reduction in the numeric rating scale score for leg pain from baseline to 12 months. A Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to quantify the association of TTS with MCID. Maximum TTS cutoffs were derived both quantitatively, anchored to the area under the curve (AUC), and qualitatively, based on cutoff-specific MCID rates.RESULTSFrom a prospective registry, 372 patients who had undergone first-time tubular microdiscectomy were identified; 308 of these patients (83%) obtained an MCID. Attaining an MCID was associated with a shorter TTS (HR 0.718, 95% CI 0.546–0.945, p = 0.018). Effect size was preserved after adjustment for potential confounders. The optimal maximum TTS was estimated at 23.5 weeks based on the AUC, while the cutoff-specific method suggested 24 weeks. Discectomy after this cutoff starts to yield MCID rates under 80%. The 24-week cutoff also coincided with the time point after which the specificity for MCID first drops below 50% and after which the negative predictive value for nonattainment of MCID first surpasses ≥ 20%.CONCLUSIONSThe study findings suggest that late lumbar discectomy is linked with poorer patient-reported outcomes and that—in accordance with the literature—a maximum TTS of 6 months should be aimed for.

EFFICACY OF ANTIBIOTICS PROPHYLAXIS IN PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION UNDERGOING LUMBAR DISCETOMY

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
Tri Truong Van ◽  
Tri Tran Duc Duy ◽  
Khai Vo Le Quang
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Surgical Wound ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Length Of Hospitalization

Introduction: Surgical wound infection in developing coutries is about 3%. Antibiotics prophylaxis may help to reduce the surgical site infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis in patients with lumbar disc herniation who were treated with lumbar discectomy at Hue University hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted at Hue University hospital from March 2015 to May 2018 on 54 patients with lumbar disc herniation who were used antibiotics prophylaxis when undergoing discectomy. Results: The infection rate in our study was 0%. Antibiotics prophylaxis reduced the length of hospitalization as well as the medical cost. Conclusion: Antibiotics prophylaxis was effective in preventing surgical site infection despite the fact that the condition of operating rooms did not meet the standard rules. Key words: prophylaxis antibiotics, lumbar disc herniation

scholarly journals Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaojun Song ◽  
Maobo Ran ◽  
Juan Luo ◽  
Kai Zhang ◽  
Yongjie Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Postoperative Recurrence ◽  
Day Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Height Ratio ◽  
Microendoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Abstract Background Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is satisfactory for hospitalized patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Currently, only a few studies have reported about the day surgery patients undergoing PELD. Methods A total of 267 patients with LDH underwent PELD during day surgery and were followed up for at least 3 years. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and lower back pain (VAS-B and VAS-L, respectively) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI). The radiological outcomes, such as lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), the disc-height ratio, and disc instability, were recorded and compared. The clinical effects between patients treated by PELD during day surgery and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for contemporaneous hospitalized 116 patients with LDH were compared. Results Patients treated by PELD had lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay (P <  0.001) compared to those treated by MED. VAS-L, VAS-B, and ODI decreased significantly after PELD than before the operation and 3 years postoperatively. The postoperative VAS-B in the PELD group was significantly decreased than in the MED group (P = 0.001). The complications rate was 9.4% in the PELD group and 12.1% in the MED group (P = 0.471). The 1-year postoperative recurrence rate in the PELD group was much higher than that in MED group (P = 0.042). The postoperative LL and SS in the PELD group improved significantly compared to the values in the MED group (P <  0.001). According to the disc-height ratio at 3-year follow-up, a significant height loss was observed in the MED group than in the PELD group (P = 0.014). Conclusions Although the 1-year postoperative recurrence rate was relatively high, the day surgery for LDH undergoing PELD had advantages in terms of less blood loss intraoperatively, short hospital stay, efficacy for back pain, and efficiency to maintain lumbar physiological curvature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document