scholarly journals Application of fetal cell-free DNA enrichment in non-invasive prenatal screening: experience from a single center in Eastern China

2020 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-106
Author(s):  
Ying Lin ◽  
Dong Liang ◽  
Ping Hu ◽  
Hang Li ◽  
Chun-Yu Luo ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Altug Koc ◽  
Ozge Ozer Kaya ◽  
Berk Ozyilmaz ◽  
Yasar B. Kutbay ◽  
Ozgur Kirbiyik ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. S52
Author(s):  
S. Zeinali ◽  
F. Savadkoohi ◽  
A. Farzad ◽  
H. Bagherian ◽  
S. Sarhadi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1067-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henna V. Advani ◽  
Angela N. Barrett ◽  
Mark I. Evans ◽  
Mahesh Choolani

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Léon Nshimyumukiza ◽  
Jean-Alexandre Beaumont ◽  
Julie Duplantie ◽  
Sylvie Langlois ◽  
Julian Little ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 413 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 490-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hada C. Macher ◽  
Pilar Noguerol ◽  
Pablo Medrano-Campillo ◽  
María R. Garrido-Márquez ◽  
Amalia Rubio-Calvo ◽  
...  

OBM Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Alison Schmidt ◽  
◽  
Anthony Shanks ◽  

Cell-free DNA has emerged as the most reliable, non-invasive prenatal screening tool for fetal aneuploidies. It has come to replace the previously widely used quadruple screen offered in the second trimester of pregnancy. This change comes with improved detection for aneuploidy but also presents potential gaps in prenatal diagnosis including detection of open fetal defects and emerging data on prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes. This review article provides a historical summary of the quadruple marker screen and evaluates the intersection of this screen with cell-free DNA. Furthermore, it discusses points to consider as providers trend toward cell-free DNA testing alone and reviews potential options to remedy any disparities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document