Complete response to talimogene laherparepvec in a primary acral lentiginous melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 548-551
Author(s):  
Viola Franke ◽  
Philippe M.G. Smeets ◽  
Jacqueline E. van der Wal ◽  
Alexander C.J. van Akkooi
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e001701
Author(s):  
Julia Maria Ressler ◽  
Matthias Karasek ◽  
Lukas Koch ◽  
Rita Silmbrod ◽  
Joanna Mangana ◽  
...  

BackgroundTalimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a licensed therapy for use in melanoma patients of stage IIIB-IVM1a with injectable, unresectable metastatic lesions in Europe. Approval was based on the Oncovex Pivotal Trial in Melanoma study, which also included patients with distant metastases and demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 40.5% and a complete response (CR) rate of 16.6%.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the outcome of melanoma patients treated with T-VEC in a real-life clinical setting.MethodsBased on data from 10 melanoma centers in Austria, Switzerland and southern Germany, we conducted a retrospective chart review, which included 88 patients (44 male, 44 female) with a median age of 72 years (range 36–95 years) treated with T-VEC during the period from May 2016 to January 2020.Results88 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for analysis. The ORR was 63.7%. 38 patients (43.2%) showed a CR, 18 (20.5%) had a partial response, 8 (9.1%) had stable disease and 24 (27.3%) patients had a progressive disease. The median treatment period was 19 weeks (range: 1–65), an average of 11 doses (range: 1–36) were applied. 39 (45.3%) patients developed adverse events, mostly mild, grade I (64.1%).ConclusionThis real-life cohort treatment with T-VEC showed a high ORR and a large number of durable CRs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 153 (7) ◽  
pp. 719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishwas Parekh ◽  
Tara Gangadhar ◽  
Kristin L. Kreider ◽  
Rosalie Elenitsas ◽  
Emily Y. Chu

2019 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Iglesias ◽  
S Ribero ◽  
A Barreiro ◽  
S Podlipnik ◽  
C Carrera ◽  
...  

Immunotherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (16) ◽  
pp. 1167-1172
Author(s):  
Janice Hu ◽  
Sabran J Masoud ◽  
Surya Ravichandran ◽  
Georgia M Beasley ◽  
Paul J Mosca

Aim: Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a genetically modified oncolytic herpesvirus approved for the treatment of unresectable, locoregionally advanced and recurrent melanoma. There is little relevant literature in the context of retreatment with T-VEC. Materials & methods: We reviewed four patients aged 71–87 years old with stage IIIB–IV melanoma at treatment who were rechallenged with T-VEC after experiencing recurrence of locoregional disease or prior treatment-limiting toxicity. Results: Cessation of initial treatment was due to one of the following reasons: severe adverse event (one case), mixed response (one case) or complete response (two cases). Three males and one female underwent T-VEC retreatment with a mean of 5.5 injection cycles. Three patients experienced a complete response to retreatment, while one experienced disease progression. Conclusion: Intralesional T-VEC may be effective and well-tolerated in patients who have completed prior T-VEC therapy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 280-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan T. Blackmon ◽  
Michael S. Stratton ◽  
Young Kwak ◽  
Peter G. Pavlidakey ◽  
Andrzej T. Slominski ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e029475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj Lalu ◽  
Garvin J Leung ◽  
Yuan Yi Dong ◽  
Joshua Montroy ◽  
Claire Butler ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis study aimed to conduct a systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence to chart the successful trajectory of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) from the bench to the clinic.DesignThis study was a systematic review. The primary outcome of interest was the efficacy of treatment, determined by complete response. Abstract and full-text selection as well as data extraction were done by two independent reviewers. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias in studies.SettingEmbase, Embase Classic and OvidMedline were searched from inception until May 2016 to assess its development trajectory to approval in 2015.ParticipantsPreclinical and clinical controlled comparison studies, as well as observational studies.InterventionsT-VEC for the treatment of any malignancy.Results8852 records were screened and five preclinical (n=150 animals) and seven clinical studies (n=589 patients) were included. We saw large decreases in T-VEC’s efficacy as studies moved from the laboratory to patients, and as studies became more methodologically rigorous. Preclinical studies reported complete regression rates up to 100% for injected tumours and 80% for contralateral tumours, while the highest degree of efficacy seen in the clinical setting was a 24% complete response rate, with one study experiencing a complete response rate of 0%. We were unable to reliably assess safety due to the lack of reporting, as well as the heterogeneity seen in adverse event definitions. All preclinical studies had high or unclear risk of bias, and all clinical studies were at a high risk of bias in at least one domain.ConclusionsOur findings illustrate that even successful biotherapeutics may not demonstrate a clear translational road map. This emphasises the need to consider increasing rigour and transparency along the translational pathway.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42016043541.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. 1004-1006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristi M. Lara ◽  
Gino K. In ◽  
George R. Matcuk ◽  
Arjun Mehta ◽  
James S. Hu

Oral Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 104899
Author(s):  
Ashley C. Hsu ◽  
Niels C. Kokot ◽  
Burton L. Eisenberg ◽  
Jacob S. Thomas

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22089-e22089
Author(s):  
Emma H.A. Stahlie ◽  
Viola Franke ◽  
Charlotte L. Zuur ◽  
Willem M.C. Klop ◽  
Bernies Van Der Hiel ◽  
...  

e22089 Background: Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a genetically modified herpes simplex type 1 virus, which is used as an oncolytic immunotherapy in stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma patients. It is known to be an effective therapy for injectable cutaneous, subcutaneous and nodal melanoma lesions, as approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Combination therapy is not yet approved by EMA pending the results of the phase 3 Masterkey-265 trial. The objective of the current study was to identify prognostic factors for achieving a complete response (CR) that can be used to select patients for treatment with T-VEC monotherapy. Methods: Patients with stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma, treated with T-VEC at the Netherlands Cancer Institute between 2016-12 and 2019-05 with a follow-up time > 6 months, were included. Data was collected on baseline characteristics, responses and adverse events (AEs). Durable response rate (DRR) was defined as the percent of patients with a CR or partial response (PR) maintained continuously > 6 months. Univariable analyses were conducted and a prediction model was developed to identify prognostic factors associated with complete response. Results: For this study, a total of 71 patients were included with a median follow-up of 16.1 months. The median age was 70 years (range: 35-90). As best response, 47 patients (66%) had a CR and 10 patients (14%) had a PR, resulting in an overall response rate of 80%. Twenty-one patients (30%) stopped treatment because of progressive disease and sixteen patients (23%) developed a recurrence during follow-up after achieving a PR or CR. Median duration of CR was 11 months. The durable response rate was 42%. Grade 1-2 AEs occurred in almost every patient. Tumor size, type of metastases, previous treatment with systemic therapy and stage (8Th AJCC) were independent prognostic factors for achieving a CR and for progression-free survival. Achieving a CR was associated with a reduced risk of death. The prediction model includes tumor size, type of metastases (only cutaneous vs. subcutaneous (+/- cutaneous) vs. nodal (+/- cutaneous/subcutaneous)) and number of lesions as predictors. Conclusions: This study shows that intralesional T-VEC monotherapy for stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma is able to achieve high complete and durable response rates. The prediction model shows that use of T-VEC in patients with less tumor burden is associated with better outcomes, suggesting T-VEC should perhaps be used earlier in the course of the disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document