Panniculitis With Necrotizing Granulomata in a Patient on BRAF Inhibitor (Dabrafenib) Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma

2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. e96-e99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nisha S. Ramani ◽  
Jonathan L. Curry ◽  
Jyoti Kapil ◽  
Ronald P. Rapini ◽  
Michael T. Tetzlaff ◽  
...  
Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2284
Author(s):  
Serena Stamatakos ◽  
Giovanni Luca Beretta ◽  
Elisabetta Vergani ◽  
Matteo Dugo ◽  
Cristina Corno ◽  
...  

Metabolic changes promoting cell survival are involved in metastatic melanoma progression and in the development of drug resistance. In BRAF-inhibitor resistant melanoma cells, we explored the role of FASN, an enzyme involved in lipogenesis overexpressed in metastatic melanoma. Resistant melanoma cells displaying enhanced migratory and pro-invasive abilities increased sensitivity to the BRAF inhibitor PLX4032 upon the molecular targeting of FASN and upon treatment with the FASN inhibitor orlistat. This behavior was associated with a marked apoptosis and caspase 3/7 activation observed for the drug combination. The expression of FASN was found to be inversely associated with drug resistance in BRAF-mutant cell lines, both in a set of six resistant/sensitive matched lines and in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia. A favorable drug interaction in resistant cells was also observed with U18666 A inhibiting DHCR24, which increased upon FASN targeting. The simultaneous combination of the two inhibitors showed a synergistic interaction with PLX4032 in resistant cells. In conclusion, FASN plays a role in BRAF-mutated melanoma progression, thereby creating novel therapeutic opportunities for the treatment of melanoma.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Zocco ◽  
Simona Bernardi ◽  
Mauro Novelli ◽  
Chiara Astrua ◽  
Paolo Fava ◽  
...  

Abstract Detection of BRAFV600E within cell free tumor DNA (ctDNA) is emerging as a promising means to improve patients’ stratification or enable BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) therapeutic monitoring in a minimally invasive manner. Here, we investigated whether extracellular vesicle-(EV)-associated-DNA (EV-DNA) has value as an alternative source of circulating BRAFV600E. To do so, we identified a clinical practice-compatible protocol for the isolation of EV-DNA and assessed BRAF gene status on plasma samples from metastatic melanoma patients at the beginning and during BRAFi therapy. This protocol uses a peptide with high affinity for EVs and it has been found to recover more mutant DNA from plasma than standard ultracentrifugation. Molecular analyses revealed that mutant DNA is largely unprotected from nuclease digestion, interacting with the outer side of the EV membrane or directly with the peptide. When used on clinical samples, we found that the protocol improves the detection of BRAFV600E gene copies in comparison to the reference protocol for ctDNA isolation. Taken together, these findings indicate that EVs are a promising source of mutant DNA and should be considered for the development of next-generation liquid biopsy approaches.


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1965-1977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Rizos ◽  
Alexander M. Menzies ◽  
Gulietta M. Pupo ◽  
Matteo S. Carlino ◽  
Carina Fung ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 1797-1798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Klein ◽  
Arthur Clements ◽  
Alexander M. Menzies ◽  
Sandra O’Toole ◽  
Richard F. Kefford ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 446-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Marcé ◽  
Hélène Cornillier ◽  
Christelle Denis ◽  
Annie-Pierre Jonville-Bera ◽  
Laurent Machet

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlyn N. Myrdal ◽  
Srinath Sundararajan

Little is known about the optimal sequencing of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in the treatment of patients with BRAFV600-mutated metastatic melanoma. BRAF/MEK inhibition often has the benefit of rapid disease regression; however, resistance is frequently seen with long-term use. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors offers the potential for long-term response but displays a lower rate of objective response. The benefit of synergy between therapies is apparent; however, there is limited data regarding optimal sequencing in the treatment of advanced melanoma. We present the case of a 62-year-old gentleman with advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma who followed an unconventional treatment path. After progressing on single-agent vemurafenib, he had response to multiple modalities of immunotherapy before progression. After, he had a substantial response to multiple BRAF/MEK inhibitor rechallenges before developing resistance. The patient is now stable after a retrial of combination immunotherapy. Our case illustrates that with the right sequencing of therapy, meaningful clinical responses can be elicited with rechallenging of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 715-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Leal ◽  
Eugenia Agut-Busquet ◽  
Jorge Romani ◽  
Mireia Sabat ◽  
Mireia Yebenes ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 168-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel F. Sanmamed ◽  
Sara Fernández-Landázuri ◽  
Carmen Rodríguez ◽  
María D. Lozano ◽  
José I. Echeveste ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9030-9030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Hersh ◽  
Michele Del Vecchio ◽  
Michael Paul Brown ◽  
Richard Kefford ◽  
Carmen Loquai ◽  
...  

9030 Background: Activating mutations of BRAF V600 can be found in 40%-50% of melanomas and are related to poor prognosis. In a phase 3 trial for the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM) in chemotherapy-naive patients, nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) vs dacarbazine (DTIC) demonstrated a significant improvement in the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by independent radiological review (IRR), and a trend toward prolonged overall survival (OS) at the interim survival analysis. The study also explored the effect of BRAF status on the efficacy parameters. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IV melanoma (M1c stage 65%; elevated LDH 28%) and ECOG performance status 0-1 were randomized to nab-P 150 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (n = 264) or DTIC 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 21-day cycle (n = 265) independent of BRAF status. Prespecified subgroup analyses of final PFS and interim OS in subgroups by BRAF status (V600E mutant, wild-type, or unknown) were performed. Results: BRAF mutation status was balanced between the treatment arms, with 36% and 38% of patients with known BRAF mutation status in the nab-P and DTIC arms, respectively. Patient characteristics were also balanced within BRAF subgroups. As shown in the Table, advantage in the nab-P arm vs DTIC arm was observed for both PFS and interim OS regardless of BRAFmutation status. Poststudy BRAF inhibitor treatment was also balanced. Conclusions: In this phase III trial, treatment effect was independent of BRAF mutation status, benefiting all patients who received nab-P vs DTIC. Therefore nab-P should be considered in the armamentarium for all chemotherapy-naive patients with MM. Clinical trial information: NCT00864253. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document