scholarly journals Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials in Fragile X Syndrome

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 508-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Berry-Kravis ◽  
David Hessl ◽  
Leonard Abbeduto ◽  
Allan L. Reiss ◽  
Andrea Beckel-Mitchener ◽  
...  
Biomarkers ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 497-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Pellerin ◽  
Artuela Çaku ◽  
Mathieu Fradet ◽  
Paméla Bouvier ◽  
Jean Dubé ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 1751-1757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Berry-Kravis ◽  
Allison Sumis ◽  
Ok-Kyung Kim ◽  
Rebecca Lara ◽  
Joanne Wuu

Author(s):  
Agustini Utari ◽  
Weerasak Chonchaiya ◽  
Susan M. Rivera ◽  
Andrea Schneider ◽  
Randi J. Hagerman ◽  
...  

Abstract Minocycline can rescue the dendritic spine and synaptic structural abnormalities in the fragile X knock-out mouse. This is a review and preliminary survey to document side effects and potential outcome measures for minocycline use in the treatment of individuals with fragile X syndrome. We surveyed 50 patients with fragile X syndrome who received minocycline for at least 2 weeks and found that the most common reported side effect is gastrointestinal difficulty, including loss of appetite. The families reported an improvement in language and behavioral areas. Outcome measures in the design of future randomized clinical trials should include both behavioral and language measures. As with any other treatments, we emphasize that randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the efficacy of minocycline in fragile X syndrome.


2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Champigny ◽  
Florence Morin-Parent ◽  
Laurence Bellehumeur-Lefebvre ◽  
Artuela Çaku ◽  
Jean-François Lepage ◽  
...  

Background: Limited success of previous clinical trials for Fragile X syndrome (FXS) has led researchers to consider combining different drugs to correct the pleiotropic consequences caused by the absence of the Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP). Here, we report the results of the LovaMiX clinical trial, the first trial for FXS combining two disease-modifying drugs, lovastatin, and minocycline, which have both shown positive effects when used independently.Aim: The main goals of the study were to assess the safety and efficacy of a treatment combining lovastatin and minocycline for patients with FXS.Design: Pilot Phase II open-label clinical trial. Patients with a molecular diagnostic of FXS were first randomized to receive, in two-step titration either lovastatin or minocycline for 8 weeks, followed by dual treatment with lovastatin 40 mg and minocycline 100 mg for 2 weeks. Clinical assessments were performed at the beginning, after 8 weeks of monotherapy, and at week 20 (12 weeks of combined therapy).Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure was the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C) global score. Secondary outcome measures included subscales of the FXS specific ABC-C (ABC-CFX), the Anxiety, Depression, and Mood Scale (ADAMS), the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions (BRIEF), and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale second edition (VABS-II).Results: Twenty-one individuals out of 22 completed the trial. There were no serious adverse events related to the use of either drugs alone or in combination, suggesting good tolerability and safety profile of the combined therapy. Significant improvement was noted on the primary outcome measure with a 40% decrease on ABC-C global score with the combined therapy. Several outcome measures also showed significance.Conclusion: The combination of lovastatin and minocycline is safe in patients for FXS individuals and appears to improve several elements of the behavior. These results set the stage for a larger, placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial to confirm the beneficial effects of the combined therapy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1333-1340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Reines ◽  
Krista Charen ◽  
Tracie Rosser ◽  
Arri Eisen ◽  
Stephanie L. Sherman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hampson ◽  
Alexander Hooper ◽  
Yosuke Niibori

Viral vector-mediated gene therapy has grown by leaps and bounds over the past several years. Although the reasons for this progress are varied, a deeper understanding of the basic biology of the viruses, the identification of new and improved versions of viral vectors, and simply the vast experience gained by extensive testing in both animal models of disease and in clinical trials, have been key factors. Several studies have investigated the efficacy of adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors in the mouse model of fragile X syndrome where AAVs have been used to express fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), which is missing or highly reduced in the disorder. These studies have demonstrated a range of efficacies in different tests from full correction, to partial rescue, to no effect. Here we provide a backdrop of recent advances in AAV gene therapy as applied to central nervous system disorders, outline the salient features of the fragile X studies, and discuss several key issues for moving forward. Collectively, the findings to date from the mouse studies on fragile X syndrome, and data from clinical trials testing AAVs in other neurological conditions, indicate that AAV-mediated gene therapy could be a viable strategy for treating fragile X syndrome.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-244
Author(s):  
Christina M. Harkins ◽  
Kelli C. Dominick ◽  
Logan K. Wink ◽  
Ernest V. Pedapati ◽  
Rebecca C. Shaffer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document