Combination of dexamethasone and local anaesthetic solution in peripheral nerve blocks

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 751-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thi Mum Huynh ◽  
Emmanuel Marret ◽  
Francis Bonnet
Author(s):  
Depinder Kaur ◽  
Reena Mahajan ◽  
Shiv Kumar Singh ◽  
Suchitra Malhotra

Introduction: Faculty and Residents are trained in peripheral nerve blocks guided by blind technique, Peripheral Neuro Stimulator (PNS) or Ultrasound (USG) guided technique. But due to unavailability of USG machine in all institutes and requiring special training, techniques used for peripheral nerve blocks vary from institute to institute. Aim: To analyse the effect of anaesthesiologists’ experience on preferred technique and Local Anaesthetic (LA) volume used for brachial plexus nerve block retrospectively. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective observational study, 129 adults American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II patients requiring brachial plexus nerve block for upper limb orthopaedic surgical anaesthesia for both elective and emergency surgery were divided into three groups for each year depending on technique for nerve block used. Group A: Received USG guided (Micromaxx Sonosite Inc, USA) brachial plexus nerve block. Group B: Received peripheral nerve stimulator (Inmed) guided brachial plexus nerve block. Group C: Received brachial plexus nerve block by traditional anatomical landmark based paraesthesia elicitation blind technique. Patients with inadequate surgical analgesia were given general anaesthesia and were categorised as failure rate. Year wise demographic data, type of technique used for giving brachial plexus nerve block, volume of drug used, failure rate, complications observed were collected and analysed by Student’s t-test and Chi-square test. Results: USG guided technique was the most prefered technique in both years (57.6%, n=38 in year 2018 and 49.2%, n=31 in year 2019). In remaining nearly half of the patients PNS and blind technique was used (PNS 24.2%, n=16 in year 2018 and 20.6%, n=13 in year 2019; blind technique 18.2%, n=12 in year 2018 and 30.2%, n=19 in year 2019). Significantly, less volume of LA drug (mL) was used in group A in year 2019 (16.43±6.07) than in year 2018 (22.34±4.75) (p<0.001). Failure rate in group A in year 2019 (3.2%) was significantly less than in year 2018 (5.2%), but the difference was insignificant in all three groups. In group A, no complications were observed in year 2019 while one incidence of hemidiaphragm paralysis was observed in year 2018, while in group B and C, complications were observed in both years. Conclusion: USG guided nerve block was the most preferred technique for nerve block in the study institute. In 24 months observation period, with increasing experience with USG there was significant increase in success rate and decrease in the volume of LA administered and complications.


2020 ◽  
pp. 247-269
Author(s):  
Dr. Owen Davies

There are a number of important emergencies associated with regional anaesthesia that the anaesthetist should be aware of. Life-threatening emergencies, such as local anaesthetic systemic toxicity leading to cardiorespiratory arrest can occur irrespective of the site of local anaesthetic infiltration. Specific procedures including epidural and spinal anaesthesia, eye blocks, and peripheral nerve blocks cause a range of surgical emergencies and severe complications. Neuraxial anaesthesia carries the risk of epidural haematoma and abscess while infiltration or local anaesthetic around the globe carries the risk of both retro-orbital haematoma and globe perforation, all of which may require urgent surgical intervention. Although literature supports the safety of low concentration (1 in 200 000) adrenaline as an additive to digital blocks, inadvertent injection of higher concentrations may have the potential for ischaemic injury. Finally, the assessment and diagnosis of perioperative nerve injuries when associated with a peripheral nerve block present a formidable clinical challenge.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. 173
Author(s):  
Natarajan Pooranan ◽  
Dhanasekaran C

Peripheral nerve blocks have become important in clinical practice because of their role in post-operative pain relief, shortening of patient recovery time & avoiding risks and adverse effects of general anaesthesia. Bupivacaine is a long acting local anaesthetic. Due to its long duration of action and combined with its high quality sensory blockade compared to motor blockade it has been the most commonly used local anaesthetic for peripheral nerve blocks. Ropivacaine is a newer, long acting local anaesthetic whose neuronal blocking potential used in peripheral nerve blockade seems to be equal or superior to bupivacaine. Studies show that it has significantly greater safety margin over bupivacaine. Hence here is an attempt through the study to compare bupivacaine with ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block in ASA II&III patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodosios Saranteas ◽  
Iosifina Koliantzaki ◽  
Olga Savvidou ◽  
Marina Tsoumpa ◽  
Georgia Eustathiou ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierfrancesco Fusco ◽  
Eugenio Di Martino ◽  
Giuseppe Paladini ◽  
Francesca De Sanctis ◽  
Stefano Di Carlo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document