scholarly journals Serious adverse events in patients with target-oriented blood pressure management

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 2135-2144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Frey ◽  
Isaac Gravestock ◽  
Giuseppe Pichierri ◽  
Johann Steurer ◽  
Jakob M. Burgstaller
2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (16) ◽  
pp. 1977-1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam P. Bress ◽  
Tom Greene ◽  
Catherine G. Derington ◽  
Jincheng Shen ◽  
Yizhe Xu ◽  
...  

Hypertension ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haares Mirzan ◽  
Rahul Aggarwal ◽  
Nicholas Chiu ◽  
Sang Myung Han ◽  
Jason Park ◽  
...  

Introduction: Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) determined that among non-diabetic patients with increased CV risk, intensive management of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to a target of 120 mmHg resulted in lower rates of CV events and all-cause mortality, as opposed to the standard goal of 140 mmHg. Current management of BP in the CKD population shows conflicting evidence on target SBP. With the use of patient-level SPRINT data, our study investigates the risks and benefits of intensive BP management in patients with CKD at baseline and is the largest study of intensive BP management in CKD patients (n=2646). Methods: The similarity between CKD patients in standard and intensive blood pressure management groups with regard to age, race, gender, estimated GFR (eGFR), and baseline SBP were assessed and no differences were found between the two groups. Differences in mortality, adverse events, and rates of achieving BP targets in intensive and standard BP management groups were examined. Cox proportional-hazards models were used for the events analysis. Multiple linear regression was used to assess the differences in achieving BP targets. Results and Discussion: We highlight three key findings. First, the average post-management SBP was higher in CKD patients than in non-CKD patients in both standard ( p = 0.017) and intensive ( p < .001) groups, controlling for age, race, gender, eGFR, and baseline SBP, possibly indicating greater difficulty in controlling BP in CKD patients . Second, intensively-treated CKD patients had increased risks for intervention-related adverse events, including events that resulted in disability, hospitalization, or harm that may have required medical or surgical intervention (p < .001). They also experienced higher rates of AKI related adverse events (p<.008). Third, intensive management showed a mortality benefit (HR: .725; 95% CI, .532 to .987), a finding that may help clarify conflicting reports in current literature. In conclusion, we present an analysis of CKD-specific SPRINT data in order to elucidate the clinical benefits and risks of intensive BP management in the CKD population.


2021 ◽  
pp. 0271678X2110043
Author(s):  
Thompson G Robinson ◽  
Jatinder S Minhas ◽  
Joseph Miller

Over the last two decades, there have been a number of major landmark clinical trials, classified as “major” as they sought to address clear clinical practice driven questions, in a pragmatic yet robust trial design, using a large powered sample size (n > 1000), in order to help improve patient outcome through informing guidelines. A commonality across all stroke sub-types included in these trials is the tendency to acute hypertensive crises within the acute stroke period. This phenomenon is associated with greater stroke complications and worsened overall prognosis. Multiple trials have attempted to address the issue of acute blood pressure management during the acute stroke period, with consideration for timing, magnitude of lowering, agent and relationship to other interventions. This review will consider the major clinical trials performed in ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke that test the hypothesis that acute BP reduction improves clinical outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document