Abstract P128: Intensive Blood Pressure Management in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: An Analysis of the SPRINT Dataset

Hypertension ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haares Mirzan ◽  
Rahul Aggarwal ◽  
Nicholas Chiu ◽  
Sang Myung Han ◽  
Jason Park ◽  
...  

Introduction: Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) determined that among non-diabetic patients with increased CV risk, intensive management of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to a target of 120 mmHg resulted in lower rates of CV events and all-cause mortality, as opposed to the standard goal of 140 mmHg. Current management of BP in the CKD population shows conflicting evidence on target SBP. With the use of patient-level SPRINT data, our study investigates the risks and benefits of intensive BP management in patients with CKD at baseline and is the largest study of intensive BP management in CKD patients (n=2646). Methods: The similarity between CKD patients in standard and intensive blood pressure management groups with regard to age, race, gender, estimated GFR (eGFR), and baseline SBP were assessed and no differences were found between the two groups. Differences in mortality, adverse events, and rates of achieving BP targets in intensive and standard BP management groups were examined. Cox proportional-hazards models were used for the events analysis. Multiple linear regression was used to assess the differences in achieving BP targets. Results and Discussion: We highlight three key findings. First, the average post-management SBP was higher in CKD patients than in non-CKD patients in both standard ( p = 0.017) and intensive ( p < .001) groups, controlling for age, race, gender, eGFR, and baseline SBP, possibly indicating greater difficulty in controlling BP in CKD patients . Second, intensively-treated CKD patients had increased risks for intervention-related adverse events, including events that resulted in disability, hospitalization, or harm that may have required medical or surgical intervention (p < .001). They also experienced higher rates of AKI related adverse events (p<.008). Third, intensive management showed a mortality benefit (HR: .725; 95% CI, .532 to .987), a finding that may help clarify conflicting reports in current literature. In conclusion, we present an analysis of CKD-specific SPRINT data in order to elucidate the clinical benefits and risks of intensive BP management in the CKD population.

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (16) ◽  
pp. 1977-1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam P. Bress ◽  
Tom Greene ◽  
Catherine G. Derington ◽  
Jincheng Shen ◽  
Yizhe Xu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S155
Author(s):  
Fran Kirkham ◽  
GN Nuredini ◽  
A Saunders ◽  
Erin Drazich ◽  
Eva Bunting ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 132 (7) ◽  
pp. 840-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Stolzenburg Oxlund ◽  
Manan Pareek ◽  
Benjamin Schnack Brandt Rasmussen ◽  
Muthiah Vaduganathan ◽  
Tor Biering-Sørensen ◽  
...  

Hypertension ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Buhnerkempe ◽  
Vivek Prakash ◽  
Albert Botchway ◽  
Oritsegbubemi Adekola ◽  
John M Flack

Background: The landmark Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) showed that more intensive systolic blood pressure treatment (SBP < 120 mm Hg) was associated with lower risk for cardiovascular events and mortality but higher risk for serious adverse events (SAEs). However, it is unclear if the magnitude and/or the direction of the BP change determines SAE risk. In this study, we aim to determine how the magnitude and direction of BP change impacts SAE risk. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of 7922 participants in SPRINT. Time-varying Cox proportional hazards models were used to explore the relationship between visit-to-visit BP change and SAE risk. BP change was categorized using five intervals: 1) decreases ≥30 mm Hg, 2) decreases 10-29 mm Hg, 3) increases or decreases <10 mm Hg (reference category), 4) increases 10-29 mm Hg, and 5) increases ≥30 mm Hg. Additional variables adjusted for in the model included: age, gender, race, estimated glomerular filtration rate, treatment group, and baseline atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Hypotension was excluded as an SAE to prevent bias in SAE risk in the large BP decrease category. Results: The hazard ratio (HR) for SAEs compared to the minimal BP change category was greatest for BP increases above 30 mm Hg (HR = 1.62, 95% confidence interval [1.30, 2.01]). However, the HR was similar for sharp BP decreases over 30 mm Hg (HR = 1.52 [1.23, 1.87]). Milder BP increases and decreases were associated with lower SAE risk (HR = 1.18 [1.06, 1.32] and HR = 1.10 [0.98, 1.22] for BP changes 10 to 30 mm Hg and -30 to -10 mm Hg, respectively). There were no significant interactions between BP change, intensive treatment, and baseline ASCVD risk. Conclusions: SAE risk was similar for similarly sized increases and decreases in BP between visits, with higher magnitude changes associated with higher SAE risk. When accounting for the magnitude of BP change, no significant effect of intensive treatment or baseline ASCVD risk was found.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document