Sustained SBP control and long-term nursing home admission among Medicare beneficiaries

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Barrett Bowling ◽  
Richard Sloane ◽  
Carl Pieper ◽  
Alison Luciano ◽  
Barry R. Davis ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 1396-1402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Nerius ◽  
Kristina Johnell ◽  
Sara Garcia-Ptacek ◽  
Maria Eriksdotter ◽  
Britta Haenisch ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 528-528
Author(s):  
Portia Cornell ◽  
Tetyana Shippee

Abstract Assisted living is generally understood to offer a greater degree of privacy and independence than a nursing home; most residents pay privately, with some receiving support from state subsidies and Medicaid; regulation and oversight are the purview of state agencies. Within these broad parameters, however, one assisted living community may look quite different from another across the country, or down the street, in its resident population and the regulations that govern its operating license. The purpose of this symposium is to explore that variation. The papers leverage an in-depth review of changes in assisted-living regulation from 2007 to 2019 and a methodology to identify Medicare beneficiaries in assisted living using ZIP codes. To set the stage, the first paper examines variation across assisted living licenses to identify six regulatory types and compare their populations’ characteristics and health-care use. The second paper analyzes trends over time in the clinical acuity of assisted living residents associated with changes in nursing home populations. The third paper investigates racial disparities in assisted living associated with memory-care designations and proportions of Medicaid recipients. The fourth investigates how regulation of hospice providers in assisted living affect end-of-life care and place of death. The final paper describes requirements related to care for the residents with mental illness in seven states. The symposium concludes with an expert in long-term care disparities and quality discussing the implications for policymakers, providers, and the population needing long-term care in assisted living.


2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 1587-1591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Gill ◽  
Ling Han ◽  
Evelyne A. Gahbauer ◽  
Linda Leo-Summers ◽  
Heather G. Allore

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew F. Coburn ◽  
Erika C. Ziller ◽  
Nathan Paluso ◽  
Deborah Thayer ◽  
Jean A. Talbot

State and federal policies have shifted long-term services and support (LTSS) priorities from nursing home care to home and community-based services (HCBS). It is not clear whether the rural LTSS system reflects this system transformation. Using the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, we examined nursing home use among rural and urban Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older. Study findings indicate that even after controlling for known predictors of nursing home use, rural Medicare beneficiaries exhibited greater odds of nursing home residence and that the higher odds of rural nursing home residence are, in part, associated with higher rural nursing home bed supplies. A complex interplay of policy, LTSS infrastructure, and social, cultural, and other factors may be influencing the observed differences. Federal and state efforts to build rural HCBS capacity may be necessary to mitigate stubbornly persistent rural–urban differences in the patterns of institutional and community-based LTSS use.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. P1239-P1240
Author(s):  
Michael Nerius ◽  
Kristina Johnell ◽  
Sara Garcia-Ptacek ◽  
Maria Eriksdotter ◽  
Britta Haenisch ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 711-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura M. Keohane ◽  
Amal Trivedi ◽  
Vincent Mor

Medically needy pathways may provide temporary catastrophic coverage for low-income Medicare beneficiaries who do not otherwise qualify for full Medicaid benefits. Between January 2009 and June 2010, states with medically needy pathways had a higher percentage of low-income beneficiaries join Medicaid than states without such programs (7.5% vs. 4.1%, p < .01). However, among new full Medicaid participants, living in a state with a medically needy pathway was associated with a 3.8 percentage point (adjusted 95% confidence interval [1.8, 5.8]) increase in the probability of switching to partial Medicaid and a 4.5 percentage point (adjusted 95% confidence interval [2.9, 6.2]) increase in the probability of exiting Medicaid within 12 months. The predicted risk of leaving Medicaid was greatest when new Medicaid participants used only hospital services, rather than nursing home services, in their first month of Medicaid benefits. Alternative strategies for protecting low-income Medicare beneficiaries’ access to care could provide more stable coverage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document