Injectable Bone Applied for Ridge Augmentation and Dental Implant Placement: Human Progress Study

The guided bone regeneration (GBR) technique has been used to achieve optimal bone volume augmentation and allow dental implant placement in atrophic maxilla and mandible, with predictable results and high survival rates. The use of bone substitutes has reduced the necessity of autogenous bone grafts, reducing the morbidity at the donor areas and thus improving the patients’ satisfaction and comfort. This clinical case report shows a clinical and histological evaluation of the bone tissue behavior, in a case that required the horizontal augmentation of the alveolar ridge, with the use of xenograft biomaterial and further dental implant placement. After six months of healing time, six implants were placed, and a bone biopsy was done. The histological analysis depicted some fragments of the xenograft bone graft, integrated with the new-formed bone tissue.

Download Full-text

PC197: Central Giant Cell Granuloma resection, ridge augmentation with hard and soft tissue and subsequent dental implant placement. Case report, 12 years following

Journal Of Clinical Periodontology ◽

10.1111/jcpe.196_12916 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 45 ◽

pp. 427-427

Keyword(s):

Case Report ◽

Soft Tissue ◽

Giant Cell ◽

Dental Implant ◽

Giant Cell Granuloma ◽

Central Giant Cell Granuloma ◽

Ridge Augmentation ◽

Implant Placement

Download Full-text

Localized Maxillary Ridge Augmentation With a Block Allograft for Dental Implant Placement: Case Reports

Implant Dentistry ◽

10.1097/01.id.0000078233.89631.f8 ◽

2003 ◽

Vol 12 (3) ◽

pp. 217-226 ◽

Cited By ~ 59

Author(s):

Joseph A. Leonetti ◽

Richard Koup

Keyword(s):

Dental Implant ◽

Case Reports ◽

Ridge Augmentation ◽

Implant Placement

Download Full-text

Central Giant Cell Granuloma resection, ridge augmentation with hard and soft tissue and subsequent dental implant placement. Case report, 12 years following.

10.26226/morressier.5ac383272afeeb00097a3d52 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Olivia Rojas

Keyword(s):

Case Report ◽

Soft Tissue ◽

Giant Cell ◽

Dental Implant ◽

Giant Cell Granuloma ◽

Central Giant Cell Granuloma ◽

Ridge Augmentation ◽

Implant Placement

Download Full-text

Effectiveness of the bone ring technique and simultaneous implant placement for vertical ridge augmentation: a systematic review

International Journal of Implant Dentistry ◽

10.1186/s40729-020-00280-0 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Luis Miguel Sáez-Alcaide ◽

Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann ◽

Luis Sánchez-Labrador ◽

Fabián Pérez-González ◽

Pedro Molinero-Mourelle ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Survival Rate ◽

Dental Implant ◽

Bone Block ◽

Cochrane Central Register ◽

Alveolar Ridge ◽

Marginal Bone Loss ◽

Ridge Augmentation ◽

Implant Placement ◽

Clinical Scenarios

Abstract Background Dimensional changes after dental extraction frequently lead to situations in which bone augmentation procedures are required prior to dental implant placement. Bone ring technique (BRT) has been described as a one-stage approach to restore vertical alveolar ridge defects, in which an autogenous or allogeneic cortico-cancellous bone block graft is stabilized with a dental implant inserted simultaneously. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical performance of BRT. Materials and methods This review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search was conducted in four databases: (1) The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed) via Ovid; (2) Web of Science (WOS); (3) SCOPUS; and (4) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool were used to assess the quality of evidence in the studies reviewed. Results Sixteen studies with a total of 186 patients treated with 219 bone rings bocks were included in the review. The studies showed a mean bone gain of 4.94 mm, mean bone resorption of 0.83 mm, and mean marginal bone loss of 0.57 mm after a mean follow-up period of 13.35 months. A mean bone ring survival rate of 97.26% and implant survival rate of 94.97% were recorded. Conclusions BRT would appear to be an adequate alternative technique for restoring single vertical alveolar ridge defects with simultaneous dental implant placement. However, further studies comparing this technique with other vertical ridge augmentation procedures in different clinical scenarios are needed to confirm the present results.

Download Full-text

Alveolar Bone Augmentation

Key Engineering Materials ◽

10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.614.89 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 614 ◽

pp. 89-94 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Cena Dimova ◽

Kiro Papakoca ◽

Velko Papakoca

Keyword(s):

Dental Implant ◽

Tooth Extraction ◽

Alveolar Bone ◽

Bone Volume ◽

The Body ◽

Surgical Reconstruction ◽

Bone Augmentation ◽

Alveolar Ridge Augmentation ◽

Ridge Augmentation ◽

Implant Placement

Bones and teeth are the only structureswithin the body where calciumandphosphate participate asfunctional pillars. Despite their mineralnature, both organs are vital and dynamic. The aim was to remark the indications for alveolar augmentation after tooth extraction and prior the placement of endoosseous dental implants. The autograft, allograft, alloplast, and xenograftmaterials all have reported success, alone or in combination,for particulate bone augmentation. Theparticulate autograft is the gold standard for mostcraniofacial bone grafting, including the treatmentof dental implant–related defects. Advantages of alveolar ridge augmentation with sufficient bone volume to adjust for uncompromised and esthetic implant placement, renders these procedures more than effective for majority of patients. Surgical reconstruction of the tissues and the procedure of ridge augmentation and subsequent placement of dental implant are necessary.

Download Full-text