scholarly journals Pathologic and Treatment Outcomes Among a Geriatric Population of Endometrial Cancer Patients: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Ancillary Data Analysis of LAP2

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 730-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin A. Bishop ◽  
James J. Java ◽  
Kathleen N. Moore ◽  
Joan L. Walker
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Early Stage Endometrial Cancer

ObjectivesElderly endometrial cancer patients have worse disease-specific survival than their younger counterparts, but the cause for this discrepancy is unknown. The goal of this analysis is to compare outcomes by age in a fully staged elderly endometrial cancer population.Methods/MaterialsThis is an analysis of patients on Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (GOG) LAP2, which included clinically early stage endometrial cancer patients randomized to laparotomy versus laparoscopy for surgical staging. Patients were divided into risk groups based on criteria defined by GOG protocol 99. Differences in outcomes and adjuvant therapy were assessed within these risk groups.ResultsLAP2 included 715 patients 70 years or older. With increasing age, worse tumor characteristics were seen. Older patients received similar rates of adjuvant therapy when stratified by stage. Patients 70 years or older had significantly worse progression-free survival and overall survival, and on multivariate analysis, older age and high-risk uterine factors were predictors of progression-free survival and overall survival, whereas stage and lymph node metastases were not. When patients were divided into GOG protocol 99 risk categories, most of those who met the high-intermediate risk criteria did so based on age above 70 years and grade 2 to 3 disease. These patients had low risk of recurrence (3.3%) compared with those who met the criteria by age above 70 years and all 3 uterine factors (20.9%).ConclusionsIn early stage endometrial cancer, patients 70 years or older who undergo similar surgical management and adjuvant therapy, age and tumor characteristics independently predict recurrence. Most patients older than 70 years meet the high-intermediate risk criteria for recurrence based on age and 1 other uterine risk factor, and our results suggest that these patients are at low risk for recurrence.

Present-day management of uterine leiomyosarcoma: Evaluation of treatment sequencing and other prognostic factors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18035-e18035
Author(s):  
Emily Hinchcliff ◽  
Jennifer Rumpf ◽  
Ravin Ratan ◽  
Nicole D. Fleming ◽  
Amir A. Jazaeri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Common Mutation ◽  
Uterine Leiomyosarcoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Grade 3

e18035 Background: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) is a rare tumor with limited therapeutic options and no clearly established best treatment sequence strategy. Methods: Women with ULMS between 2013-2018 were identified. Clinical data was collected; descriptive statistics were performed and predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Results: 189 patients were included. Median age was 53 (20-84), 91% had grade 3 tumors and 51.3% had stage IB disease. 50% underwent surgery followed by chemotherapy (n = 94, 49.7%) and 37% had surgery only (n = 70). 49 patients retained their ovaries; there was no difference in OS by oophorectomy status (p = 0.71). Estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) status, positive in 41% and 33% respectively, was not independently associated with OS (p = 0.23, p = 0.12) nor did it impact OS among those with oophorectomy and without (p = 0.70). The most common adjuvant therapy regimens were gemcitabine/docetaxel (gem/doce, 64%) or ifosphamide/doxorubicin (ifos/doxo, 19%). There were no differences in the regimens prescribed by physician specialty (gynecologic oncology vs other, p = 0.21). 147 patients (78%) experienced a recurrence or progression. For the 73 patients who received gem/doce as adjuvant therapy, 58.9% recurred and were most commonly treated with doxo containing regimens (67%). Of the 22 patients treated with ifos/doxo, only 3 recurred and each received a different second line regimen. For those not treated with adjuvant therapy (70 patients), 58.2% recurred and were treated with gem/doce (62%) and ifos/doxo (24%). In early stage patients, the majority received surgery only (45%) or surgery followed by chemotherapy (44%). There was no difference in OS in those who received adjuvant therapy and those who did not (p = 0.39). 46 (24%) had molecular testing and 37 had identified mutations. The most common mutation found was P53 (n = 25, 54%) followed by RB1 (8, 17%), PTEN (7, 15%), and BRCA (2, 4%). Conclusions: Recurrence occurred in 78% of patient despite many women undergoing adjuvant therapy after surgery. Oophorectomy did not influence OS, even though 41% of tumors were ER positive. The sequence of treatment was not associated with OS, however, the risk for recurrence in patient treated with adjuvant Ifos/Doxo was 14% compared to 59% in gem/doce. This finding warrants additional evaluation to determine the optimal adjuvant therapy for these women.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document