Completion Surgery After Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Feasibility, Surgical Outcome, and Oncologic Results

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 877-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Tummers ◽  
Amin Makar ◽  
Katrien Vandecasteele ◽  
Gert De Meerleer ◽  
Hannelore Denys ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
Disease Free

IntroductionSince the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy, the survival rates of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) have improved but are still disappointing. Therefore, the idea of surgery after chemoradiation in case of LACC or bulky disease was adopted. One of the concerns regarding surgery following chemoradiotherapy is surgery-related morbidity.AimThe objectives of this study were to investigate the feasibility of surgery after advanced radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) and to describe the morbidity.MethodsThis was a prospective study of primary inoperable LACC patients primary treated with IMAT, in most cases combined with weekly cisplatin. Then the resectability was reevaluated. If resectable patients were treated with Wertheim type 2 surgery ± pelvic lymphadenectomy (on positron emission tomography–computed tomography indication). If tumor is not resectable, patients were treated with brachytherapy.ResultsSince 2006, 41 consecutive patients were included. After neoadjuvant IMAT, 34 were considered resectable and underwent surgery, whereas 7 proceeded with brachytherapy. The operative mortality rate was nil. There were no major perioperative complications. No ureter, bladder, or bowel injuries occurred. No postoperative urinary/digestive fistulae or stenoses were noted. Eleven patients had postoperatively urinary retention problems. At the time of discharge, 5 patients still needed self-catheterization. All problems resolved within 3 months. In 4 cases, we saw significant lymphoceles. In all patients intended to treat, overall survival and disease-free survival at 3 years were 63% and 74%. In the Wertheim group, overall survival and disease-free survival at 3 years were 81% and 91%.ConclusionsCompleting surgery after chemoradiation therapy (with IMAT) for LACC or bulky disease is feasible, and complication rates are comparable with those of primary surgery for cervical cancer.

Radiation with cisplatin or carboplatin for locally advanced cervix cancer: The experience of a tertiary cancer center.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15541-e15541
Author(s):  
George Au-Yeung ◽  
Linda R. Mileshkin ◽  
David Bernshaw ◽  
Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan ◽  
Danny Rischin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Distant Failure ◽  
Disease Free

e15541 Background: Definitive treatment with concurrent cisplatin and radiation is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer. The optimal management of patients with a contraindication to cisplatin has not been established. We conducted a retrospective audit of the impact of concurrent chemoradiation in a cohort of patients (pts) with locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: All pts with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with definitive radiation were entered into a prospective database. Information regarding their demographics, stage, histology, recurrence and survival were recorded. Pharmacy records were reviewed to determine concurrent chemotherapy use. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints were disease free survival and rates of primary, nodal or distant failure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, incorporating known prognostic factors of age, FIGO stage, uterine body involvement, tumour volume on MRI and nodal involvement. Results: 442 pts were treated from Jan 1996 to Feb 2011. Median age was 59 (range 22-94); 89% had squamous histology and 64% node-negative disease. 269 pts received cisplatin, 59 received carboplatin because of a contraindication to cisplatin and 114 received no concurrent chemotherapy (most prior to 1999). Overall survival adjusted for other prognostic factors was significantly improved with use of concurrent cisplatin compared to radiation alone (HR 0.53, p=0.001), as was disease free survival and the rate of distant failure. Use of concurrent carboplatin was not associated with any significant benefit compared to radiation alone in terms of overall survival or disease free survival on univariate or multivariate analyses. Conclusions: The results of this audit are consistent with the known significant survival benefit with concurrent cisplatin chemoradiation. However, there did not appear to be any significant benefit associated with concurrent carboplatin although there are potential confounding factors in this small cohort. The available evidence in the literature favors the use of non-platinum chemotherapy rather than carboplatin in pts with contraindications to cisplatin.

scholarly journals Comparison of outcomes and side effects for neoadjuvant chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel followed by chemoradiation vs. chemoradiation alone in stage IIB–IVA cervical cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Hua Liu ◽  
Ya Li ◽  
Jian Li ◽  
Lifei Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Background Currently, the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT). The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced cervical cancer is controversial. Studies have shown that the addition of a weekly regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by CCRT may be superior to a thrice-weekly regimen of NACT and CCRT. Among patients who had not received prior cisplatin, a cisplatin and paclitaxel (TP) regimen resulted in longer overall survival than other regimens. This study aims to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of NACT with weekly TP followed by CCRT. Methods This is a prospective, randomized, open-labeled, multicentered phase III study. Based on a 65% of 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate in the CCRT group and 80% of that in NACT followed by CCRT group, and on prerequisite conditions including an 8% loss to follow-up, a two-sided 5% of type I error probability, and an 80% of power, a total of 300 cases were required for enrollment. Patients with IIB–IVA cervical cancer will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to one of two intervention arms. In the study arm, patients will receive dose-dense cisplatin (40 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (60 mg/m2) weekly for 4 cycles followed by CCRT (45 Gy in 5 weeks concurrent with cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly) plus image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGBRT). In the control arm, patients will undergo CCRT treatment. The primary endpoint of the study is 2-year disease-free survival (DFS); the secondary endpoints are 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), the response rate 3 months after treatment completion, grade III/IV adverse effects, and quality of life, and potential biomarkers for predicting treatment response will also be studied. Discussion The data gathered from the study will be used to determine whether NACT with weekly TP followed by CCRT may become an optimized treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900025327. Registered on 24 August 2019. medresman.org.cn ChiCTR1900025326

Adjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel after concurrent cisplatin and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guler Yavas ◽  
Cagdas Yavas ◽  
Erdem Sen ◽  
Irem Oner ◽  
Cetin Celik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Disease Free

IntroductionStandard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) includes concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) that typically controls localized disease. However, most patients develop distant metastasis, ultimately leading to death.ObjectiveTo determine the role of adjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel for clinical outcomes in patients with LACC.MethodsBetween 2010 and 2017, 109 patients with LACC were retrospectively evaluated. All patients received cisplatin (40 mg/m2) with concurrent external-beam radiotherapy (up to 50.4 Gy), followed by intra-cavitary brachytherapy. Forty-six of 109 patients received a median of six cycles (range 3–6 cycles) of adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and carboplatin (CRT + chemotherapy group; area under the curve 5). The remaining 63 patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (CRT group).ResultsDisease-free survival and overall survival after a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range 2.6–94.75 months) were 93.5% and 95.7% and 69.8% and 82.5 % for the CRT + chemotherapy and CRT groups, respectively (p = 0.001, p = 0.012, respectively). No acute grade 3/4 gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities were seen during CRT. During adjuvant chemotherapy, the most troublesome side effects were hematologic and neurologic toxicities; however, most were manageable. No chronic grade 3/4 genitourinary toxicities were seen.DiscussionAdjuvant chemotherapy in patients with LACC significantly improved both disease-free survival and overall survival without increasing unmanageable toxicity. Future larger prospective trials are warranted to verify these findings.

scholarly journals Surgical versus clinical staging prior to primary chemoradiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO stages IIB–IVA: oncologic results of a prospective randomized international multicenter (Uterus-11) intergroup study

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1855-1861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Marnitz ◽  
Audrey Tieko Tsunoda ◽  
Peter Martus ◽  
Marcelo Vieira ◽  
Renato Jose Affonso Junior ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Surgical Staging ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

ObjectiveRevised staging of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is based on clinical examination, imaging, and potential surgical findings. A known limitation of imaging techniques is an appreciable rate of understaging. In contrast, surgical staging may provide more accurate information on lymph node involvement. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the impact of pre-treatment surgical staging, including removal of bulky lymph nodes, on disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.MethodsUterus-11 was a prospective international multicenter study including patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who were randomized 1:1 to surgical staging (experimental arm) or clinical staging (control arm) followed by primary platinum-based chemoradiation. Patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IIB–IVA underwent gynecologic examination and pre-treatment imaging including abdominal computed tomography (CT) and/or abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients had chest imaging (any of the following: X-ray, CT, or PET-CT). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival and the secondary endpoint was overall survival. An ad hoc analysis was performed after trial completion for cancer-specific survival. Randomization was conducted from February 2009 to August 2013.ResultsA total of 255 patients (surgical arm, n=130; clinical arm, n=125) with locally advanced cervical cancer were randomized. Of these, 240 patients were eligible for analysis. The two groups were comparable with respect to patient characteristics. The surgical approach was transperitoneal laparoscopy in most patients (96.6%). Laparoscopic staging led to upstaging in 39 of 120 (33%) patients. After a median follow-up of 90 months (range 1–123) in both arms, there was no difference in disease-free survival between the groups (p=0.084). For patients with FIGO stage IIB, surgical staging is superior to clinical staging with respect to disease-free survival (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.86, p=0.011). In the post-hoc analysis, surgical staging was associated with better cancer-specific survival (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.93, p=0.020).ConclusionOur study did not show a difference in disease-free survival between surgical and clinical staging in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. There was a significant benefit in disease-free survival for patients with FIGO stage IIB and, in a post-hoc analysis, a cancer-specific survival benefit in favor of laparoscopic staging. The high risk of distant metastases in both arms emphasizes the need for further evaluation.

scholarly journals Concurrent Definitive Chemoradiation Incorporating Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High Risk Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cancer: A Phase Ⅱ Study.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gong-yi ZHANG ◽  
ZHANG Rong ◽  
Ping BAI ◽  
Shu-min LI ◽  
Yuan-yuan ZHANG ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Although the prognosis of locally advanced cervical cancer has improved dramatically, survival for those with stage ⅢB-ⅣA disease or lymph nodes metastasis remains poor. It is believed that the incorporation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy into the treatment of cervical cancer might yield an improved loco-regional control, whereas more cycles of more potent chemotherapy after the completion of concurrent chemotherapy was associated with a diminished distant metastasis. We therefore initiated a non-randomized prospective phaseⅡ study to evaluate the feasibility of incorporating both these two treatment modality into the treatment of high risk locally advanced cervical cancer. Objectives to determine whether the incorporation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and the addition of adjuvant paclitaxel plus cisplatin regimen into the treatment policy for patients with high risk locally advanced cervical cancer might improve their oncologic outcomes. Study Design: Patients were enrolled if they had biopsy proven stage ⅢA-ⅣA squamous cervical cancer or stage ⅡB disease with metastatic regional nodes. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was delivered with dynamic multi-leaf collimators using 6MV photon beams. Prescription for PTV ranged from 45.0 ~ 50.0Gy at 1.8Gy ~ 2.0Gy/fraction in 25 fractions. Enlarged nodes were contoured separately and PTV-nodes were boosted simultaneously to a total dose of 50.0–65 Gy at 2.0- 2.6Gy/fraction in 25 fractions. A total dose of 28 ~ 35Gy high-dose- rate brachytherapy was prescribed to point A in 4 ~ 5 weekly fractions using an iridium- 192 source. Concurrent weekly intravenous cisplatin at 30mg/m2 was initiated on the first day of radiotherapy for over 1-hour during external-beam radiotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was scheduled within 4 weeks after the completion of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy and repeated 3 weeks later. Paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 was given as a 3-hour infusion on day1, followed by cisplatin 35 mg/m2 with 1-hour infusion on day1-2 (70 mg/m2 in total). Results Fifty patients achieved complete response 4 weeks after the completion of the treatment protocol, whereas 2 patients had persistent disease. After a median follow-up period of 66 months, loco-regional (including 2 persistent disease), distant, and synchronous treatment failure occurred in 4 ,5, and 1, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival, loco-regional recurrence-free survival, distant-metastasis recurrence-free survival was 80.5%, 90.3%, and 88.0%, respectively. Four of the patients died of the disease, and the 5-year overall survival was 92.1%. Most of the toxicities reported during concurrent chemo-radiotherapy were mild and transient. The occurrence of hematological toxicities elevated mildly during adjuvant chemotherapy, as 32% (16/50) and 4% (2/50) patients experienced grade 3–4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Grade 3–4 late toxicities were reported in 3 patients. Conclusions The incorporation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and adjuvant paclitaxel plus cisplatin chemotherapy were highly effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer. The former yields an improved loco-regional control, whereas distant metastases could be effectively eradicated with mild toxicities when adjuvant regimen was prescribed.

The 50-month results of the four non-platinum concurrent chemoradiation regimens for locally advanced cervical cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5540-5540
Author(s):  
P. Kamnerdsupaphon ◽  
I. Chitapanarux ◽  
V. Sukthomya ◽  
V. Lorvidhaya
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
Disease Free

5540 Objectives: To determine the efficacy, disease free and overall survivals of radiation therapy in combination with four non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: Eligible patients were those with a diagnosis of locally advanced cervical cancer, under 70 years of age, and undergone the necessary prestudy investigations. All patients received external-beam pelvic irradiation to a minimum dose of 5,000 cGy, and brachytherapy delivered to bring the minimum total dose at point A to 7,500 cGy. Patients were randomized to receive one of four chemotherapy regimens: Arm1: oral 5FU 250 mg/m2/day, Arm2: mitomycin 12 mg/m2 on days 1 and 28 + oral 5FU 200 mg/m2/day, Arm3: mitomycin 12 mg/m2 on days 1 and 28 followed by 5FU 1,000 mg/m2/day on days 1 through 4 and 28 through 31, Arm4: oral hydroxyurea 25 mg/kg/day. Results: From September 1995 to October 2001, the study include 921 women; 226 in arm 1, 229 in arm 2, 234 in arm 3, and 232 in arm 4. The median follow-up time was 51.69 months. More than 89% of the patients achieved complete response. Disease free survival rates were 62.4% among arm 1, 63.8% among arm 2, 66.2% among arm 3, and 68.5% among arm 4. Overall survival rates were 77.4%, 79.5%, 80.8%, and 84.5% respectively. Conclusion: The efficacy of these regimens were not inferior to the standard platinum based regimen for locally advanced cervical cancer. This study demonstrates the results of large randomized clinical study of radiochemotherapy and requires the longer follow up time for the late complications. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document