The Effect of Sleep Position Preference on Eyelid and Eyebrow Symmetry

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlene Tran ◽  
Dabin Choi ◽  
Audrey C. Ko ◽  
Keith D. Carter ◽  
Erin M. Shriver
2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 632-632
Author(s):  
Robin S. Cronin ◽  
Carol Chelimo ◽  
Edwin A. Mitchell ◽  
Kara Okesene-Gafa ◽  
John Thompson ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 157 (5) ◽  
pp. 469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl E. Hunt ◽  
Samuel M. Lesko ◽  
Richard M. Vezina ◽  
Rosha McCoy ◽  
Michael J. Corwin ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 81 (8) ◽  
pp. 673-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Tuladhar ◽  
Richard Harding ◽  
T. Michael Adamson ◽  
Rosemary S.C. Horne

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-107
Author(s):  
Carl E. Hunt

I fully support a comprehensive professional and public intervention campaign in the US to establish supine as the standard sleep position. Although other preventive health objectives can be included, the emphasis needs to be clearly focused on sleep position. Achieving the lowest possible prone prevalence rate in the US is thus the first goal of this new campaign. The second and equally important goal of the new campaign should be to utilize this opportunity to maximum advantage to enhance our knowledge regarding the epidemiological risk factors causally related to SIDS and their interactions, and the interactions between epidemiological and biological risk factors. In addition to quantifying changes in infant mortality and in infant sleep position, we will also need to characterize both the supine and the persistent prone infant groups in regard to all of the putative epidemiological risk factors for SIDS. This campaign can thus enhance our understanding of the epidemiological risk factors for SIDS as long as a significant decrease in prone prevalence can be achieved.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-58
Author(s):  
Bonnie B. Hudak ◽  
Jane O'Donnell ◽  
Nadine Mazyrka

Objective. The American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) recommendation for side or supine sleep position in healthy babies has generated much controversy. We surveyed primary care physicians to determine the effect of the AAP statement on physician attitude toward infant sleep position and advice to parents. Methods. We sent a 23-question survey to 194 physicians in Western New York. The survey addressed their attitude toward the AAP recommendations and its impact on their advice to parents. Results. Of the 149 physicians treating newborns, 121 (82%) completed the questionnaire; 98% were aware of the AAP statement. The most common sources of information were the AAP (86%) and professional literature (77%). Of the respondents, 79% agreed with the AAP statement. Reasons for reservation were lack of data (64%), potential adverse consequences of supine position (52%), and their own experience (47%). Gender, years in practice, and type of reimbursement did not influence attitude toward the AAP recommendation. The AAP statement increased the frequency with which physicians routinely discussed sleep position from 34 to 70% (P < .02). Physicians recommending the prone position decreased from 57 to 7% (P < .001), while those recommending supine sleep position increased from 10 to 42% (P < .001). Conclusions. Most physicians agreed with the AAP statement and more frequently discussed sleep position following the AAP recommendations. However, they did not routinely recommend supine sleep position. The majority (69%) recommended the side position even though it is unstable. Although the AAP statement has increased discussion of infant sleep position by primary care physicians in WNY, only a minority recommend that infants sleep supine.


2021 ◽  
pp. archdischild-2020-320527
Author(s):  
Hanna-Leena Kristiina Kukkola ◽  
Pia Vuola ◽  
Maija Seppä-Moilanen ◽  
Päivi Salminen ◽  
Turkka Kirjavainen

IntroductionObstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and feeding difficulties are key problems for Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) infants. OSA management varies between treatment centres. Sleep positioning represents the traditional OSA treatment, although its effectiveness remains insufficiently evaluated.DesignTo complete a polysomnographic (PSG) evaluation of effect of sleep position on OSA in PRS infants less than 3 months of age. We analysed a 10-year national reference centre dataset of 76 PRS infants. PSG was performed as daytime recordings for 67 in the supine, side and prone sleeping position when possible. In most cases, recording included one cycle of non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep in each position.ResultsOne-third of infants (9/76, 12%) had severe OSA needing treatment intervention prior to PSG. During PSG, OSA with an obstructive apnoea and hypopnoea index (OAHI) >5 per hour was noted in 82% (55/67) of infants. OSA was most severe in the supine and mildest in the side or in the prone positions. The median OAHI in the supine, side and prone positions were 31, 16 and 19 per hour of sleep (p=0.003). For 68% (52/67) of the infants, either no treatment or positional treatment alone was considered sufficient.ConclusionsThe incidence of OSA was 84% (64/76) including the nine infants with severe OSA diagnosed prior to PSG. For the most infants, the OSA was sleep position dependent. Our study results support the use of PSG in the evaluation of OSA and the use of sleep positioning as a part of OSA treatment.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (9) ◽  
pp. 500-504
Author(s):  
Charlotte Wright ◽  
Hannah Beard ◽  
Jennifer Cox ◽  
Paula Scott ◽  
Joyce Miller

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document