Neither Atypical Nor Conventional Antipsychotics Increase Mortality or Hospital Admissions Among Elderly Patients With Dementia: A Two-Year Prospective Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 416-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minna M. Raivio ◽  
Jouko V. Laurila ◽  
Timo E. Strandberg ◽  
Reijo S. Tilvis ◽  
Kaisu H. Pitkälä
2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Buja ◽  
Andrea Bardin ◽  
Giulia Grotto ◽  
Stefania Elvini ◽  
Pietro Gallina ◽  
...  

AbstractPrevious research had shown the number of comorbidities is a major factor influencing the burden of care for elderly patients with obstructive lung disease (OLD). This retrospective cohort study on a large population of elderly patients (age > 65 years) with OLD in northern Italy measures the use of healthcare resources associated with the most frequent combinations of comorbidities and investigates the most common reasons for hospitalization. Total health costs, pharmacy costs, emergency department (ED) visits, outpatient visits, and hospital admissions are assessed for every subject. The most common causes of hospitalization by a number of comorbidities and the most common sets of three comorbidities are identified. For each comorbidity group, we rank a list of the most frequent causes of hospitalization, both overall and avoidable with effective ambulatory care. A small group of patients suffering from major comorbidities accounts for the use of most healthcare resources. The most frequent causes of hospitalization are respiratory failure, heart failure, chronic bronchitis, and bronchopneumonia. The most common conditions manageable with ambulatory care among causes of hospitalizations are heart failure, bacterial pneumonia, and COPD. The set of three comorbidities responsible for the highest average total costs, and the highest average number of hospitalizations and outpatient visits comprised hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, and heart failure. The main reasons for hospitalization proved to remain linked to heart failure and acute respiratory disease, regardless of specific combinations of comorbidities. Based on these findings, specific public health interventions among patients with OLD cannot be advised on the basis of specific sets of comorbidities only.


2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woo Suk Song ◽  
Jun Cheol Choi ◽  
Young Sang Lee ◽  
Hwa Yeop Na ◽  
Jun Won Choi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Alferes ◽  
Marinha Silva ◽  
Joana Couto ◽  
Ana Ventura ◽  
Clemente Sousa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims The option of a non-dialytic or conservative approach to elderly patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) as an alternative to dialysis has a great interest in clinical practice. Among elderly patients with ESRD, the octogenarian ones raise the most difficult decisions with respect to indication and dialysis therapy management, furthermore the evidence about the clinical outcomes is lacking in this group of patient. The main objectives of this study were the analysis the comorbidities and clinical condition of pre-ESRD octogenarians who initiated dialysis and the estimation of the effect of such treatment on this patient group’s comorbid status. Method The authors performed a retrospective and statistical analysis on patients with aged ≥ 80 years who initiated hemodialysis treatment in a Portuguese Central Hospital between 2007 and 2017. A total of 88 patients were included in the study. Results The mean age of the group was 84±2.8 years; 61.4% were men. Nearly all the patients (97.7%) had one or more comorbid conditions of which the most common were hypertension (86.4%), heart disease (58%) and diabetes (43.2%). In 60.2% of the patients the functional activity was normal (Karnofsky score ≥80). Hemodialysis was initiated in an emergency situation in 58% of the patients and the majority (59.1%) had an arteriovenous fistula as vascular access. In the 2 years previous to dialysis therapy, most patients (54.5%) had at least one hospitalization (min=1; max=4). During the two years of follow-up, the number of hospital admissions decreased (p=0.034) and only 39.8% of the patients required hospital admission (min=1; max=3) (table 1), with shorter average hospital stay (p=0.013) (table 2). The main causes of hospitalization in the pre-dialysis period were renal related-diseases, in contrast the admissions were due to non-access related infections and vascular access complications after dialysis had initiated. Most patients died (67%) at the end of follow-up mainly due to non-vascular access infections or sepsis (32.2%). The significant causes of death found by Cox regression were chronic kidney disease secondary to systemic disease, Karnofsky score and hospital stay in the 2-year-dialysis period (table 3). Conclusion Advanced age in itself should not be used as an excluding factor of dialysis treatment. Comorbidity and performance status are the factors that should exert the greatest influence on such decision. In this sample, the majority of patients had few comorbidities, a good functional activity and they initiated dialysis by an autologous vascular access which may have contributed to the good outcomeS. This study found a decrease in the number of hospitalizations in the dialysis period which can be explained by regular clinical monitoring in every dialysis treatment, preventing or even treating intercurrent illnesses and avoiding hospital admissions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. vi145
Author(s):  
L. Bellu ◽  
G. Lombardi ◽  
A. Pambuku ◽  
E. Bergo ◽  
Z. Vittorina

2021 ◽  
pp. 25-29
Author(s):  
B. Santhi ◽  
A. Ramprasath ◽  
R. Saradha

BACKGROUND: Mesenteric ischemia is a frequently lethal condition resulting from critically reduced perfusion to the gastrointestinal tract. It accounts for 1-2% of hospital admissions for abdominal pain. Mortality due to mesenteric ischemia ranges from 24% to 96% with an average of 69%. AIM: The aim of this case series is to outline the clinical presentation and challenges in diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia and emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and intervention in reducing the mortality and morbidity. This article presents a series of 4 cases of the 3 major types of acute mesenteric ischemia – 2 cases of Acute Mesenteric Arterial Thrombosis(AMAT), one case of Acute Mesenteric Arterial Embolism(AMAE) and one case of Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis(MVT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 4 patients who had undergone emergency laparotomy for acute mesenteric ischemia during the month of December 2020 in the Department of General Surgery, Government Kilpauk Medical College were studied. All 4 cases have been analysed during this study period of one month and followed up until discharge from the hospital. RESULTS: This case series consisted of 4 cases. Out of 4 cases, 3 were cases of Superior Mesenteric Arterial Occlusion due to thrombus and emboli and 1 was a case of Superior Mesenteric Vein Occlusion by thrombus. All 4 were male patients. All 4 patients presented with sudden onset of abdominal pain with or without vomiting. Abdominal distension, constipation and clinical features suggestive of bowel gangrene was not seen in all cases. Out of 4 cases, 2 cases were diagnosed early and taken up for immediate surgery and had a better outcome postoperatively with shorter hospital stay. Denitive diagnosis could not be made at time of admission for one case and was taken up for surgery late after the general condition of the patient deteriorated and extensive gangrene of the small bowel was seen during surgery. One case succumbed to septic shock after surgery following delayed presentation. This case series attempts to highlight that the key to successful management in acute mesenteric ischemia is a high index of suspicion leading to early diagnosis, aggressive resuscitation and early mesenteric revascularization. CONCLUSION: Despite the remarkable advances in in vascular surgical technique, vascular imaging, percutaneous intervention and surgical critical care, mesenteric ischemia remains a complex and often disheartening disease. Acute mesenteric ischemia is a life threatening vascular emergency that requires a high degree of clinical suspicion and early intervention to avoid a poor outcome. As Acute Mesenteric Ischemia often affects elderly patients, we have to consider the possibility of acute mesenteric ischemia in all elderly patients presenting with abdominal pain that is out of proportion to the ndings on physical examination


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document