Relational Communications Strategies to Support Family-Centered Neonatal Intensive Care

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Benzies
2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 016-020
Author(s):  
Haydeh Heidari ◽  
Marjan Mardani-Hamooleh

AbstractFamily-centered care (FCC) is one of the important elements of care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The aim of this study was to understand the nurses' perception of FCC in NICUs. This qualitative study was performed using conventional content analysis. Participants in this study included 18 nurses who were selected by a purposeful method. Semistructured, in-depth and face-to-face interviews were conducted with the participants. All interviews were written down, reviewed, and analyzed. Two categories were identified after the data analysis: (1) prerequisite for providing FCC and (2) parents' participation. Prerequisite for providing FCC consisted of two subcategories namely suitable facilities and adequate personnel. Parents' participation included subcategories of parents: neonate's attachment and parents' training. Nurses' perception of FCC in NICUs can facilitate an appropriate condition for the participation of family members in the care of neonates.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 1023-1024
Author(s):  
Robert D. Cunningham

I read "The Principles for Family-Centered Neonatal Care" with great interest. As a physician who has worked in a state government-operated neonatal intensive care unit follow-up clinic, I agree wholeheartedly with the principle of open and honest communication between parents and professionals, especially regarding poor developmental outcomes. Unfortunately, physicians, despite their own feelings about this issue, may come under pressure from third parties to withhold certain information from families. In my own experiences, I have been drawn aside in private conversations and told that if I continue to tell parents that their child is mentally retarded or has cerebral palsy, it might have an adverse impact on my career.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 111 (Supplement_E1) ◽  
pp. e450-e460
Author(s):  
Kimberly A. Cisneros Moore ◽  
Kara Coker ◽  
Allison B. DuBuisson ◽  
Betsy Swett ◽  
William H. Edwards

Objective. Multidisciplinary teams from 11 medical center neonatal intensive care units collaborated in a quality improvement project with a focus on family-centered care. Methods. Through a process of self-analysis, literature review, benchmarking site visits, and expert consultation, 10 potentially better practice (PBP) areas were defined. Improvement activities in 4 of the 10 areas are given as examples of successes and challenges that individual centers encountered. The 4 areas are vision and philosophy, unit culture, family participation in care, and families as advisors. Results. Centers were at different places for all of the PBPs at the beginning and throughout the collaboration. Seven centers developed or revised their vision or philosophy of care statements about family-centered care. Incorporating the vision and philosophy of care into performance appraisals, hiring of new personnel, and changing unit culture to a more family-centered practice were more challenging than developing the statements. Full parent participation in care requires unrestricted access to the neonatal intensive care unit. The shift from considering parents to be “visitors” to being partners in caring for their child was more difficult for centers with restricted visitation policies. All centers developed, expanded, or started plans for establishing family advisory councils. The experience of 2 centers is described. Conclusions. Family-centered care is more of a journey than a destination. Collaborating centers in this project found themselves at different places in that journey. Through perseverance in implementing the PBPs, all have moved further along the path.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 1025-1026
Author(s):  
Helen Harrison

The parents who drafted "The Principles For Family-Centered Neonatal Care"1 have all spent considerable time in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Most of us are parents of two or more premature babies. We are familiar with NICU families of all backgrounds through our work in support organizations, disability rights groups, and ethics committees. Our university educations may have made us better able to understand and articulate the issues, but they did not significantly alter our experience in the NICU.


Rev Rene ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. e39767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruna Caroline Rodrigues ◽  
Roberta Tognollo Borotta Uema ◽  
Gabrieli Patrício Rissi ◽  
Larissa Carolina Segantini Felipin ◽  
Ieda Harumi Higarashi

Author(s):  
Ronald M. Green ◽  
George A. Little

There is evidence that religious beliefs strongly influence families’ treatment decisions about their loved ones, especially when difficult life-and-death choices must be made. This becomes important in the context of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) committed to family-centered care because families’ beliefs will influence their decision making. To assist NICU professionals, families, and students of bioethics, the chapters in this book seek to address the question, “What are the teachings of the world’s major religious traditions about the status and care of the newborn?” This introduction presents six “take-home” insights derived from the discussions that follow.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document