How Does Age Affect Urinary Continence following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy? A Prospective Multi-Institutional Study Using Independently Collected, Validated Questionnaires

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Gondoputro ◽  
James Thompson ◽  
Melanie Evans ◽  
Damien Bolton ◽  
Mark Frydenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Urinary Continence ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Validated Questionnaires

scholarly journals Clinical significance and risk factors of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study

BMC Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigenori Kakutani ◽  
Yuta Takeshima ◽  
Yuta Yamada ◽  
Tetsuya Fujimura ◽  
Shoichi Nagamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Urinary Continence ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Urinary Leakage ◽  
Postoperative Continence ◽  
The University

Abstract Background There has been a limited number of reports on the significance and risk factors of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage (AUL) following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We aimed to analyze the clinical significance of AUL and evaluated its risk factors. Methods We conducted a multi-institutional study to review patients with prostate cancer undergoing RARP in three centers (The University of Tokyo Hospital, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, and Chiba Tokushukai Hospital). “Positive AUL” was defined as urinary extravasation at the anastomosis detected by post-operative cystogram and was further categorized into minor or major AUL. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of AUL. Postoperative continence rates and time to achieve continence were also analyzed. Results A total of 942 patients underwent RARP for prostate cancer in 3 centers. Of these patients, a cystogram after the RARP procedure was not performed in 26 patients leaving 916 patients for the final analysis. AUL was observed in 56 patients (6.1%); 34 patients (3.7%) with minor AUL and 22 patients (2.4%) with major AUL. Patients with major AUL exhibited a significantly longer time to achieve continence than those without major AUL. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that longer console time (≥ 184 min) was significantly associated with overall AUL, and higher body mass index (≥ 25 g/kg2) was a significant predictor of both major and overall AUL. Conclusions The presence of major AUL was associated with the achievement of urinary continence, suggesting clinical relevance of its diagnosis by postoperative cystogram. A selective cystogram has been proposed for high-risk cases. Furthermore, identification of the risk factors of AUL will lead to optimal application.

scholarly journals Comparison of Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang-Nan Xu ◽  
Zhen-Yu Xu ◽  
Hu-Ming Yin
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Lower Incidence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Urinary Continence ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Postoperative Continence ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterior Prostate

Background: The Retzius space-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) has shown better results in urinary continence, but its efficacy and safety compared to conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (c-RARP) remain controversial.Material and Methods: A research was conducted in Medline via PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to January 4, 2021, to identify studies comparing RS-RARP to c-RARP. We used RevMan 5.3 and STATA 14.0 for meta-analysis.Results: A total of 14 studies involving 3,129 participants were included. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in positive surgical margins (PSMs), but the RS-RARP group had significantly higher PSM rates in the anterior site [odds ratio (OR) = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.22–4.16, P = 0.01]. Postoperative continence in RS-RARP group at 1 month (OR = 5.72, 95% CI: 3.56–9.19, P < 0.01), 3 months (OR = 6.44, 95% CI: 4.50–9.22, P < 0.01), 6 months (OR = 8.68, 95% CI: 4.01–18.82, P < 0.01), and 12 months (OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.20–4.70, P = 0.01) was significantly better than that in the c-RARP group. In addition, the RS-RARP group had a shorter console time (mean difference = −16.28, 95% CI: −27.04 to −5.53, P = 0.003) and a lower incidence of hernia (OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.19–0.67, P = 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, pelvic lymph node dissection rate, postoperative complications, 1-year-biochemical recurrence rate, and postoperative sexual function.Conclusions: Compared with c-RARP, RS-RARP showed better recovery of continence, shorter console time, and lower incidence of hernia. Although there was no significant difference in overall PSM, we suggest that the surgeon should be more careful if the lesion is in the anterior prostate.

The Impact of Lateral Bladder Neck Preservation on Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Hashimoto ◽  
Kunihiko Yoshioka ◽  
Tatsuo Gondo ◽  
Kazuki Hasama ◽  
Yosuke Hirasawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Bladder Neck ◽  
Urinary Continence ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Neck Preservation ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Detrusorrhaphy during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Early Recovery of Urinary Continence and Surgical Technique

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Tae Young Shin ◽  
Yong Seong Lee
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Catheter Removal ◽  
Urinary Continence ◽  
Nerve Sparing ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Early Recovery ◽  
Open Radical Prostatectomy

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has largely replaced open radical prostatectomy as the standard surgical treatment for prostate cancer. However, postoperative urinary incontinence still persists and has a significant impact on quality of life. We report the superior results of the detrusorrhaphy technique during RARP that helps achieve early continence. Our prospective study involved 95 consecutive patients who underwent RARP between March 2015 and May 2017; fifty patients underwent RARP using the new detrusorrhaphy technique (group 1) and 45 underwent standard RARP (group 2). The postoperative oncological and functional outcomes were compared between the two groups. The postoperative continence was assessed at 0 day, 1 week, 4 weeks, 8–12 weeks, and 6 months after catheter removal. Continence was defined as the use of no pad over a 24 h period. Mean operative time in groups 1 and 2 were 250 and 220 min, respectively. Intraoperative complications were not encountered in any patient. The continence rates after catheter removal in groups 1 and 2 were 68% and 0% at 0 day, 78% and 17.8% at 1 week, 86% and 64.4% at 4 weeks, 92% and 73.3% at 8–12 weeks, and 100% and 91.1% at 6 months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the nerve sparing technique, D’Amico risk groups, and prostate volume were involved in the early recovery of urinary continence. The detrusorrhaphy technique is simple, safe, and feasible, which helped achieve earlier continence. It showed significantly better outcomes than those achieved with the standard RARP technique in terms of urinary incontinence. Nevertheless, our findings need to be validated in further studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document