Learning Curves for Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy Using CUSUM Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise L. Toennesen ◽  
Helene H. Vindum ◽  
Ellen Risom ◽  
Alexis Pulga ◽  
Rafi M. Nessar ◽  
...  
Thorax ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 534-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. V. Kemp ◽  
S. H. El Batrawy ◽  
R. N. Harrison ◽  
K. Skwarski ◽  
M. Munavvar ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 1701102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Leong ◽  
Sheetal Deshpande ◽  
Louis B. Irving ◽  
Philip G. Bardin ◽  
Michael W. Farmer ◽  
...  

Endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA) is an established, minimally invasive way to sample intrathoracic abnormalities. The EBUS scope can be passed into the oesophagus to perform endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA). In cases of suspected lung cancer, a combination of the two techniques is now recommended by consensus guidelines. EBUS TBNA is usually performed by pulmonologists; however, the learning curve for EUS-B-FNA, which may be performed during the same procedure, has not been described.A multicentre, observational Australian study, using prospectively collected data from three experienced pulmonologists was conducted. Cumulative sum (cusum) analysis was used to generate visual learning curves.A total of 152 target lesions were sampled in 137 patients, with an overall sensitivity for malignancy of 94.8%. The sensitivity for malignant lesions outside of the 2009 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer lymph node map (largely intraparenchymal lesions) was 92.9%. All three operators were competent by conventional cusum criteria. There was one case of pneumothorax, and no episodes of mediastinitis or oesophageal perforation were observed.Our data suggest that experienced pulmonologists can safely and accurately perform EUS-B-FNA, with a high diagnostic sensitivity for both lymph node and non-nodal lesions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 126 (10) ◽  
pp. 2295-2300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Chen ◽  
Andrew C. Vamos ◽  
Seth H. Dailey ◽  
Jack J. Jiang

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heezoo Kim ◽  
Dong Kyu Lee ◽  
Choong Hun Lee ◽  
Myung-Hoon Gong ◽  
Jung Suk Oh

Abstract Background: Tracheoscopic ventilation tube (TVT) is a specially designed single-lumen endotracheal tube with a camera. It was developed to facilitate endobronchial blocker insertion without bronchoscopy; its ability to explore anatomy received attention for difficult intubations. To clarify the feasibility of TVT in difficult intubation, we evaluated the learning curves of intubation between novice and expert. Methods: 182 patients who presented as Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade IIb and III with cervical in-line stabilization, and 4 trainees (2 novices, 2 experts) at single tertiary care teaching university hospital. All trainees performed intubation with TVT during laryngoscopy. Intubation attempts were limited to two times, each within 30 seconds. For every attempt, trainees visualized an imaginary pathway from the teeth to vocal cords and then shaped the stylet. Intubation was confirmed by three successive ETCO 2 measurements > 30 mmHg. Using CUSUM analysis, the trial was continued until every trainee reached an acceptable failure rate. Results: Patients were constituted with 94.5% CL grade IIb and 5.5% grade III. The median number of acceptable performances (10% of the acceptable failure rate) was 36. Overall failure rate was 5.5% (95%CI: 2.2-8.8%), with 6.9% (95%CI: 2.0-11.8%) for novices and 3.7% (95%CI: 0.0-7.8%, P=0.165, Cohen’s h=0.14) for experts. Intubation time was longer in novices by about 3 seconds compared to experts (mean difference=2.8, 95%CI: 1.3-4.3, P<0.001, Cohen's d=0.57). Conclusions: Intubation with TVT in CL grades IIb and III was easy to learn and could be an alternative for difficult intubation. It required small cases to reach acceptable performance, and provided a short learning period even for novice anesthesiologists, with failure rates similar to those of experienced anesthesiologists.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Flandes Aldeyturriaga ◽  
Luis Giraldo ◽  
Javier Alfayate ◽  
Iker Fernández-Navamuel ◽  
Carlos Agustí ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The disposable bronchoscope is an excellent alternative to face the problem of SARS-CoV-2 and other cross infections, but the bronchoscopist's perception of its quality has not been evaluated. Methods: To evaluate the quality of the Ambu-aScope4 disposable bronchoscope, we carried out a cross-sectional study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services. We use a standardized questionnaire completed by the bronchoscopists at the end of each bronchoscopy. The variables were described with absolute and relative frequencies, measures of central tendency and dispersion depending on their nature. The existence of learning curves was evaluated by CUSUM analysis.Results: The most frequent indications in 300 included bronchoscopies was bronchial aspiration in 69.3% and the median duration of these was 9.1 minutes. The route of entry was nasal in 47.2% and oral in 34.1%. The average score for ease of use, image, and aspiration quality was 80/100. All the planned techniques were performed in 94.9% and the bronchoscopist was satisfied in 96.6% of the bronchoscopies. They highlighted the portability and immediacy of the aScope4TM to start the procedure in 99.3%, the possibility of taking and storing images in 99.3%. The CUSUM analysis showed average scores> 70/100 from the first procedure and from the 9th procedure more than 80% of the scores exceeded the 80/100 score. Conclusions: The aScope4 ™ scored well for ease of use, imaging, and aspiration. We found a learning curve with excellent scores from the 9th procedure. Bronchoscopists highlighted its portability, immediacy of use and the possibility of taking and storing images.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Flandes Aldeyturriaga ◽  
Luis Giraldo ◽  
Javier Alfayate ◽  
Iker Fernández-Navamuel ◽  
Carlos Agustí ◽  
...  

Abstract Background:The disposable bronchoscope is an excellent alternative to face the problem of SARS-CoV-2 and other cross infections, but the bronchoscopist's perception of its quality has not been evaluated. Methods: To evaluate the quality of the Ambu-aScope4 disposable bronchoscope, we carried out a cross-sectional study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services. We use a standardized questionnaire completed by the bronchoscopists at the end of each bronchoscopy. The variables were described with absolute and relative frequencies, measures of central tendency and dispersion depending on their nature. The existence of learning curves was evaluated by CUSUM analysis.Results:The most frequent indications in 300 included bronchoscopies was bronchial aspiration in 69.3% and the median duration of these was 9.1 minutes. The route of entry was nasal in 47.2% and oral in 34.1%. The average score for ease of use, image, and aspiration quality was 80/100. All the planned techniques were performed in 94.9% and the bronchoscopist was satisfied in 96.6% of the bronchoscopies. They highlighted the portability and immediacy of the aScope4TM to start the procedure in 99.3%, the possibility of taking and storing images in 99.3%. The CUSUM analysis showed average scores> 70/100 from the first procedure and from the 9th procedure more than 80% of the scores exceeded the 80/100 score.Conclusions:The aScope4 ™ scored well for ease of use, imaging, and aspiration. We found a learning curve with excellent scores from the 9th procedure. Bronchoscopists highlighted its portability, immediacy of use and the possibility of taking and storing images.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Flandes ◽  
Luis Fernando Giraldo-Cadavid ◽  
Javier Alfayate ◽  
Iker Fernández-Navamuel ◽  
Carlos Agusti ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The disposable bronchoscope is an excellent alternative to face the problem of SARS-CoV-2 and other cross infections, but the bronchoscopist's perception of its quality has not been evaluated. Methods To evaluate the quality of the Ambu-aScope4 disposable bronchoscope, we carried out a cross-sectional study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services. We use a standardized questionnaire completed by the bronchoscopists at the end of each bronchoscopy. The variables were described with absolute and relative frequencies, measures of central tendency and dispersion depending on their nature. The existence of learning curves was evaluated by CUSUM analysis. Results The most frequent indications in 300 included bronchoscopies was bronchial aspiration in 69.3% and the median duration of these was 9.1 min. The route of entry was nasal in 47.2% and oral in 34.1%. The average score for ease of use, image, and aspiration quality was 80/100. All the planned techniques were performed in 94.9% and the bronchoscopist was satisfied in 96.6% of the bronchoscopies. They highlighted the portability and immediacy of the aScope4TM to start the procedure in 99.3%, the possibility of taking and storing images in 99.3%. The CUSUM analysis showed average scores > 70/100 from the first procedure and from the 9th procedure more than 80% of the scores exceeded the 80/100 score. Conclusions The aScope4™ scored well for ease of use, imaging, and aspiration. We found a learning curve with excellent scores from the 9th procedure. Bronchoscopists highlighted its portability, immediacy of use and the possibility of taking and storing images.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document