scholarly journals Meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of liposomal cisplatin versus conventional nonliposomal cisplatin in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)

Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (46) ◽  
pp. e13169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bei Xu ◽  
Min Zeng ◽  
Jiawei Zeng ◽  
Jiafu Feng ◽  
Lin Yu
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

Efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18001-e18001
Author(s):  
Lingbin Meng ◽  
Rui Ji ◽  
Huanhuan Wang ◽  
Xin Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Significant Difference

e18001 Background: A variety of systemic chemotherapy regimens have been used for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). However, most guidelines were derived from a single clinical trial, and no studies have comprehensively compared their efficacy and safety. This study is aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of systemic chemotherapies for patients with R/M HNSCC. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of published studies in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up to July 31, 2020. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled clinical trials including treatment regimens recommended by the latest NCCN guidelines. Eligible studies should report at least one of the following outcomes: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and ≥3 adverse events rate (AEs). Literature screening, data extraction and quality assessment were independently conducted by two researchers. Disputes were settled by a panel of other researchers. Network meta-analysis was used to compare the efficacy and safety of various treatment regimens. Heterogeneity and consistency using the Bayesian model were evaluated in the network meta-analysis. Results: Eighteen eligible trials involving 4930 patients and 15 treatment regimens were included. Cetuximab/platinum/5-FU regimen showed higher ORR values than the following agents, including cisplatin/5-FU (odds ratio 2.96, 95% credible interval 1.42 to 6.15), cisplatin (5.43, 1.90-15.54), 5-FU (8.12, 2.22-29.61), methotrexate (8.25, 2.86-23.79), cetuximab (10.16, 1.44-71.48), and afatinib (3.64, 1.00-13.32). Immunotherapy regimens pembrolizumab/platinum/5-FU and pembrolizumab alone also showed significantly higher ORR values than these agents, while nivolumab alone showed higher ORR than the single agents. However, no significant difference was observed between Cetuximab/platinum/5-FU and pembrolizumab/platinum/5-FU. Regarding ≥3 AEs, cisplatin/paclitaxel caused the highest toxicity. No significant difference was observed on OS and PFS among all these treatment regimens. Conclusions: Cetuximab/platinum/5-FU, pembrolizumab/platinum/5-FU or pembrolizumab alone displayed high ORR with low AE rate. Nivolumab also showed better efficacy than other single agents. Although it was reported that pembrolizumab/platinum/5-FU showed better efficacy than cetuximab/platinum/5-FU, we did not find a statistically significant improvement in ORR, OS or PFS when comparing the two regimens. Therefore, further prospective trials comparing these treatment regimens remain warranted.

scholarly journals Primary tumour standardised uptake value is prognostic in nonsmall cell lung cancer: a multivariate pooled analysis of individual data

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1751-1761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Paesmans ◽  
Camilo Garcia ◽  
Ching-Yee Oliver Wong ◽  
Edward F. Patz Jr ◽  
Ritsuko Komaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Individual Data ◽  
Standardised Uptake Value

18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (PET) complements conventional imaging for diagnosing and staging lung cancer. Two literature-based meta-analyses suggest that maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) on PET has univariate prognostic value in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We analysed individual data pooled from 12 studies to assess the independent prognostic value of binary SUVmax for overall survival.After searching the published literature and identifying unpublished data, study coordinators were contacted and requested to provide data on individual patients. Cox regression models stratified for study were used.Data were collected for 1526 patients (median age 64 years, 60% male, 34% squamous cell carcinoma, 47% adenocarcinoma, 58% stage I–II). The combined univariate hazard ratio for SUVmax was 1.43 (95% CI 1.22–1.66) and nearly identical if the SUV threshold was calculated stratifying for histology. Multivariate analysis of patients with stage I–III disease identified age, stage, tumour size and receipt of surgery as independent prognostic factors; adding SUV (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.27–1.96) improved the model significantly. The only detected interaction was between SUV and stage IV disease.SUV seems to have independent prognostic value in stage I–III NSCLC, for squamous cell carcinoma and for adenocarcinoma.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Afatinib in the Treatment of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 688
Author(s):  
Nian N. N. Maarof ◽  
Abdulsamad Alsalahi ◽  
Emilia Abdulmalek ◽  
Sharida Fakurazi ◽  
Bimo Ario Tejo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the afatinib efficacy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). This review systemically outlined and meta-analyzed the afatinib efficacy in NSCLC and R/M HNSCC in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) endpoints. Records were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect from 2011 to 2020. Eight afatinib RCTs were included and assessed for the risk of bias. In meta-analysis, overall pooled effect size (ES) of OS in afatinib group (AG) significantly improved in all RCTs and NSCLC-RCTs [hazard ratios (HRs): 0.89 (95% CI: 0.81–0.98, p = 0.02); I2 = 0%, p = 0.71/ 0.86 (95% CI: 0.76–0.97; p = 0.02); I2 = 0%, p = 0.50, respectively]. ES of PFS in AG significantly improved in all RCTs, NSCLC-RCTs, and HNSCC-RCTs [HRs: 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68–0.83; p < 0.00001); I2 = 26%, p = 0.24; 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66–0.84; p < 0.00001); I2 = 47%, p = 0.15/0.76 (95% CI: 0.65–88; p = 0.0004); I2 = 34%, p = 0.0004, respectively]. From a clinical viewpoint of severity, interstitial lung disease, dyspnea, pneumonia, acute renal failure, and renal injury were rarely incident adverse events in the afatinib group. In conclusion, first- and second-line afatinib monotherapy improved the survival of patients with NSCLC, while second-line afatinib monotherapy could be promising for R/M HNSCC. The prospective protocol is in PROSPERO (ID = CRD42020204547).

Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology for Discrimination of Squamous Cell Carcinoma from Adenocarcinoma in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 318-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lester J. Layfield ◽  
Lauren Pearson ◽  
Brandon S. Walker ◽  
Sandra K. White ◽  
Robert L. Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Objective: To determine the accuracy with which morphology alone can distinguish adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Three data bases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus) were searched for studies on the diagnostic accuracy of subtyping non-small cell lung cancer. Accuracy data was abstracted and synthesized using bivariate mixed effects logistic regression as implemented in the midas package in Stata 14. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Higgins I2. Results: We included 17 studies (2,235 cases). Most studies had a low risk of bias. The pooled diagnostic accuracy for cytological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma resulted in a sensitivity of 63% (48–76%) and specificity of 95% (87–98%). The I2 values were 93 and 88% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively. The pooled diagnostic accuracy for the cytological diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma resulted in a sensitivity of 84% (79–88%) and a specificity of 90% (84–94%). The I2 values were 69 and 86% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Conclusion: Accuracy varies widely by study and summary estimates do not provide a useful representation of accuracy. Squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed more accurately than adenocarcinoma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document