scholarly journals Accuracy of Emergency Severity Index in older adults

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsi Kemp ◽  
Janne Alakare ◽  
Minna Kätkä ◽  
Mitja Lääperi ◽  
Lasse Lehtonen ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. S36
Author(s):  
A. Ginsburg ◽  
L. Oliveira JE Silva ◽  
A. Mullan ◽  
K. Mhayamaguru ◽  
F. Bellolio

10.2196/27008 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. e27008
Author(s):  
Li-Hung Yao ◽  
Ka-Chun Leung ◽  
Chu-Lin Tsai ◽  
Chien-Hua Huang ◽  
Li-Chen Fu

Background Emergency department (ED) crowding has resulted in delayed patient treatment and has become a universal health care problem. Although a triage system, such as the 5-level emergency severity index, somewhat improves the process of ED treatment, it still heavily relies on the nurse’s subjective judgment and triages too many patients to emergency severity index level 3 in current practice. Hence, a system that can help clinicians accurately triage a patient’s condition is imperative. Objective This study aims to develop a deep learning–based triage system using patients’ ED electronic medical records to predict clinical outcomes after ED treatments. Methods We conducted a retrospective study using data from an open data set from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2012 to 2016 and data from a local data set from the National Taiwan University Hospital from 2009 to 2015. In this study, we transformed structured data into text form and used convolutional neural networks combined with recurrent neural networks and attention mechanisms to accomplish the classification task. We evaluated our performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results A total of 118,602 patients from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey were included in this study for predicting hospitalization, and the accuracy and AUROC were 0.83 and 0.87, respectively. On the other hand, an external experiment was to use our own data set from the National Taiwan University Hospital that included 745,441 patients, where the accuracy and AUROC were similar, that is, 0.83 and 0.88, respectively. Moreover, to effectively evaluate the prediction quality of our proposed system, we also applied the model to other clinical outcomes, including mortality and admission to the intensive care unit, and the results showed that our proposed method was approximately 3% to 5% higher in accuracy than other conventional methods. Conclusions Our proposed method achieved better performance than the traditional method, and its implementation is relatively easy, it includes commonly used variables, and it is better suited for real-world clinical settings. It is our future work to validate our novel deep learning–based triage algorithm with prospective clinical trials, and we hope to use it to guide resource allocation in a busy ED once the validation succeeds.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vita Maryah Ardiyani ◽  
Mia Andinawati

Triage merupakan salah satu skill yang wajib dikuasai seorang perawat yang telah dipelajari semenjak pada masa pendidikan keperawatan. Terdapat beberapa jenis triage, salah satunya adalah metode Emergency Severity Index (ESI). Metode ESI merupakan metode triage dengan prinsip memprioritaskan kegawatdaruratan pasien berdasarkan banyaknya jumlah kebutuhan medis yang di butuhkan. Tujuan pelitian ini adalah mengetahui efektifitas metode triage ESI terhadap ketepatan penentuan tingkat kegawatdaruratan pada mahasiswa program S1 keperawatan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode one grup pretest postes dan menggunakan metode purposive sampling sejumlah 85 mahasiswa program S1 keperawatan dengan menetapkan kriteria inklusi untuk menghomogenkan sample. Intrumen dalam penelitian ini menggunakan kuesioner kasus klinik dan edukasi bagan ESI. Uji statistik menggunakan Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test didapatkan p value sebesar 0.018, dapat disimpulkan terdapat perbedaan pemahaman prioritas kegawatdaruratan sebelum dan sesudah pengenalan metode pengenalan metode. Peneletian selanjutnya diharapkan mengaplikasikan metode pembelajaran triage yang menarik dan inovatif serta menganalisa efektifitasnya sebagai sarana pemahaman prioritas kasus-kasus kegawatdaruratan.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Preeti Dalawari ◽  
Jacob Sanning ◽  
Dana Pan ◽  
Jennifer Storm

Background: The Emergency Severity Index (ESI) version 4 (v4) is a triage system based on vital signs, potential limb or organthreat, as well as expected resources needed in the emergency department (ED).Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine accuracy and misclassification rate of ESI triage over one year following implementation.Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of ED encounters from January 2011 to 2012. Charts were selected in one-week intervals every 12 weeks for one year (months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12). Each encounter was reviewed to determine post hoc ESI level based on care in the ED. Descriptive statistics was used to compare the agreement between initial triage and post hoc ESI levels. Sensitivity and specificity for each level was determined. Kruskal Wallis test (KW) and Mann Whitney U (MWU) was used toassess differences in initial versus post hoc ESI levels by month to explore change in accuracy over time.Results: Five hundred and sixty separate ED encounters were included. Agreement was observed in 301 triage encounters (53.8%). Overestimation of the triage level occurred in 131 (23.4%) encounters, while the triage level was underestimated in 128 (22.9%) encounters. There was a significant decline in accuracy during the year (KW = 10.2; p = .037); with the greatest dropbetween month 1 and 9 months (MWU 4,859; p = .035). Sensitivity ranged from 24% to 76% and specificity ranged from 61% to 99%, based on ESI level.Conclusions: Enhanced education and quality improvement process is necessary to improve overall accuracy rates at this site.


2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 208-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ineke van der Wulp ◽  
Leontien M. Sturms ◽  
Augustinus J.P. Schrijvers ◽  
Henk F. van Stel

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1491-1500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki Jeong Hong ◽  
Sang Do Shin ◽  
Young Sun Ro ◽  
Kyoung Jun Song ◽  
Adam J. Singer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document