Minimally Invasive Component Separation Techniques in Complex Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Feretis ◽  
Philippa Orchard
2010 ◽  
Vol 211 (3) ◽  
pp. S88-S89
Author(s):  
Mirza M. Mujadzic ◽  
Michael Orseck ◽  
John Mellinger ◽  
Mirsad M. Mujadzic ◽  
Edmond F. Ritter

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 313-315
Author(s):  
Lara Aguilera Castro ◽  
Luis Téllez Villajos ◽  
Antonio López San Román ◽  
José Ignacio Botella Carretero ◽  
Ana García García de Paredes ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 572-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon L. Bachman ◽  
Archana Ramaswamy ◽  
Bruce J. Ramshaw

A minimally invasive component separation may lead to a dynamic abdominal wall after hernia repair, with reduced complications. We present early results of our patients undergoing this technique. Five patients were selected for open midline repairs; three with chronic infections, one with a prior midline skin graft, and one who desired a primary, tension-free repair. These three males and two females had a mean age of 50.8 ± 21.1 years and body mass index of 30.9 ± 6.2. The mean number of previous abdominal operations was 7 ± 3.4 and previous attempted hernia repairs were 4 ± 2.7. All patients had a midline laparotomy with lysis of adhesions. An endoscopic component separation was then performed bilaterally. Drains were left in the dissection bed. All patients had the midline closed; four received biologic mesh underlays. Mean operative time was 227 minutes ± 49. Mean length of stay (LOS) was 9.2 days ± 3.6. Early median follow-up was 6 months (range 0.25–9). Two patients required postop transfusions, and two patients had mild complications of the midline wound (hematoma, infection). To date, one recurrence was diagnosed by CT scan. Early evaluation of adopting the minimally invasive (MIS) component separation demonstrates minimal complications and good initial outcomes.


Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 2371
Author(s):  
Selma Benito-Martínez ◽  
Bárbara Pérez-Köhler ◽  
Marta Rodríguez ◽  
Francisca García-Moreno ◽  
Verónica Gómez-Gil ◽  
...  

Prosthetic mesh infection is a devastating complication of abdominal hernia repair which impairs natural healing in the implant area, leading to increased rates of patient morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospitalization. This preclinical study was designed to assess the effects on abdominal wall tissue repair of coating meshes with a chlorhexidine or rifampicin-carboxymethylcellulose biopolymer gel in a Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infection model. Partial abdominal wall defects were created in New Zealand white rabbits (n = 20). Four study groups were established according to whether the meshes were coated or not with each of the antibacterial gels. Three groups were inoculated with S. aureus and finally repaired with lightweight polypropylene mesh. Fourteen days after surgery, implanted meshes were recovered for analysis of the gene and protein expression of collagens, macrophage phenotypes, and mRNA expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Compared to uncoated meshes, those coated with either biopolymer gel showed higher collagen 1/3 messenger RNA and collagen I protein expression, relatively increased VEGF mRNA expression, a significantly reduced macrophage response, and lower relative amounts of MMPs mRNAs. Our findings suggest that following mesh implant these coatings may help improving abdominal wall tissue repair in the presence of infection.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e0206515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gemma Pascual ◽  
Claudia Mesa-Ciller ◽  
Marta Rodríguez ◽  
Bárbara Pérez-Köhler ◽  
Verónica Gómez-Gil ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document