Trauma surgeon-performed peripheral arterial repairs are associated with equivalent outcomes when compared to vascular surgeons

Summary. Background: Theoretically progressive compression stockings, which produce a higher compression at the calf than at the ankle level, improve venous return flow without exacerbating peripheral arterial insufficiency (PAD). We aimed to evaluate the short-term tolerance of elastic progressive compression stockings on peripheral arterial vascularisation in patients with symptomatic PAD and associated mild venous insufficiency. Patients and methods: Monocentric, prospective, open pilot study of 18 patients (acceptability study, 6 x 6 plan) evaluating the short-term tolerance of progressive compression stockings (18 ± 2 mmHg at calf and 8 ± 2 mmHg at ankle level) in patients with PAD (ankle brachial index ABI > 0.60 < 0.75) and chronic venous insufficiency (C1s–C4 stages of the CEAP classification). Day 15 tolerance was evaluated by a composite primary criteria comprising: no decrease > 15 % of ABI on each side, no decrease > 15 % of toe brachial index (TBI) on each side and no decrease > 25 % of the number of active plantar flexions performed while standing. Results: The proportion of men was 77.8 %, mean age was 77.3 ± 7.5 years and no patient were diabetic. At inclusion, the mean low ABI was 0.60 ± 0.04 and the mean high ABI was 0.77 ± 0.18. The mean low TBI was 0.32 ± 0.09 and the mean high TBI 0.46 ± 0.15. The mean number of active standing plantar flexions was 33.0 ± 5.0. The majority of the patients were classified in CEAP C2s and C3 classes (class 2: 16.7 %, class C2s: 27.8 %, class C3: 44.4 %, class C4: 5.6 % and class C4s: 5.6 %). Poor tolerance occurred in no patient. By day 30, no patient had worsening of their arterial and venous symptoms. No adverse events occurred during the study. Conclusions: These results suggest a high tolerance of progressive elastic stockings (18 ± 2 mmHg at calf and 8 ± 2 mmHg at ankle level) in symptomatic PAD.

Download Full-text

Optimized cardiovascular risk in peripheral arterial disease – does intensified statin therapy matter?

VASA ◽

10.1024/0301-1526/a000795 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 48 (4) ◽

pp. 371-372

Author(s):

Kristina Sonnenschein ◽

Jörn Tongers

Keyword(s):

Cardiovascular Risk ◽

Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽

Statin Therapy ◽

Arterial Disease ◽

Peripheral Arterial

Download Full-text

Diagnostic workup and endovascular treatment of popliteal artery trauma

VASA ◽

10.1024/0301-1526/a000756 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 48 (1) ◽

pp. 65-71 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Cheong J. Lee ◽

Rory Loo ◽

Max V. Wohlauer ◽

Parag J. Patel

Keyword(s):

Vascular Injury ◽

Gold Standard ◽

Imaging Techniques ◽

Computed Tomographic Angiography ◽

Vascular Trauma ◽

Endovascular Techniques ◽

Computed Tomographic ◽

Arterial Injuries ◽

Arterial Trauma ◽

Peripheral Arterial

Abstract. Although management paradigms for certain arterial trauma, such as aortic injuries, have moved towards an endovascular approach, the application of endovascular techniques for the treatment of peripheral arterial injuries continues to be debated. In the realm of peripheral vascular trauma, popliteal arterial injuries remain a devastating condition with significant rates of limb loss. Expedient management is essential and surgical revascularization has been the gold standard. Initial clinical assessment of vascular injury is aided by readily available imaging techniques such as duplex ultrasonography and high resolution computed tomographic angiography. Conventional catheter based angiography, however, remain the gold standard in the determination of vascular injury. There are limited data examining the outcomes of endovascular techniques to address popliteal arterial injuries. In this review, we examine the imaging modalities and current approaches and data regarding endovascular techniques for the management popliteal arterial trauma.

Download Full-text

Surgical and endovascular hybrid approach in peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs

VASA ◽

10.1024/0301-1526/a000561 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 45 (5) ◽

pp. 417-422 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Anouk Grandjean ◽

Katia Iglesias ◽

Céline Dubuis ◽

Sébastien Déglise ◽

Jean-Marc Corpataux ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mortality Rate ◽

Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽

Limb Salvage ◽

Hybrid Approach ◽

Arterial Disease ◽

Early Mortality ◽

Secondary Patency ◽

Limb Salvage Rate ◽

Peripheral Arterial ◽

Salvage Rate

Abstract. Background: Multilevel peripheral arterial disease is frequently observed in patients with intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia. This report evaluates the efficacy of one-stage hybrid revascularization in patients with multilevel arterial peripheral disease. Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database included all consecutive patients treated by a hybrid approach for a multilevel arterial peripheral disease. The primary outcome was the patency rate at 6 months and 1 year. Secondary outcomes were early and midterm complication rate, limb salvage and mortality rate. Statistical analysis, including a Kaplan-Meier estimate and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were carried out with the primary, primary assisted and secondary patency, comparing the impact of various risk factors in pre- and post-operative treatments. Results: 64 patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up time of 428 days (range: 4 − 1140). The technical success rate was 100 %. The primary, primary assisted and secondary patency rates at 1 year were 39 %, 66 % and 81 %, respectively. The limb-salvage rate was 94 %. The early mortality rate was 3.1 %. Early and midterm complication rates were 15.4 % and 6.4 %, respectively. The early mortality rate was 3.1 %. Conclusions: The hybrid approach is a major alternative in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease in multilevel disease and comorbid patients, with low complication and mortality rates and a high limb-salvage rate.

Download Full-text

Markers of arterial stiffness in peripheral arterial disease

VASA ◽

10.1024/0301-1526/a000452 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 44 (5) ◽

pp. 341-348 ◽

Cited By ~ 25

Author(s):

Marc Husmann ◽

Vincenzo Jacomella ◽

Christoph Thalhammer ◽

Beatrice R. Amann-Vesti

Keyword(s):

Arterial Stiffness ◽

Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽

Pulse Wave ◽

Augmentation Index ◽

Arterial Disease ◽

Care Physician ◽

Additional Information ◽

Non Invasive ◽

Assessment Techniques ◽

Peripheral Arterial

Abstract. Increased arterial stiffness results from reduced elasticity of the arterial wall and is an independent predictor for cardiovascular risk. The gold standard for assessment of arterial stiffness is the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Other parameters such as central aortic pulse pressure and aortic augmentation index are indirect, surrogate markers of arterial stiffness, but provide additional information on the characteristics of wave reflection. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is characterised by its association with systolic hypertension, increased arterial stiffness, disturbed wave reflexion and prognosis depending on ankle-brachial pressure index. This review summarises the physiology of pulse wave propagation and reflection and its changes due to aging and atherosclerosis. We discuss different non-invasive assessment techniques and highlight the importance of the understanding of arterial pulse wave analysis for each vascular specialist and primary care physician alike in the context of PAD.

Download Full-text

Predictive value of the ankle brachial index in patients with acute ischemic stroke

VASA ◽

10.1024/0301-1526/a000328 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 43 (1) ◽

pp. 55-61 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Konstantinos Tziomalos ◽

Vasilios Giampatzis ◽

Stella Bouziana ◽

Athinodoros Pavlidis ◽

Marianna Spanou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Hospital Mortality ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Ankle Brachial Index ◽

Arterial Disease ◽

National Institutes Of Health ◽

Limited Data ◽

Severe Stroke ◽

Hospital Outcome ◽

Peripheral Arterial

Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is frequently present in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, there are limited data regarding the association between ankle brachial index (ABI) ≤ 0.90 (which is diagnostic of PAD) or > 1.40 (suggesting calcified arteries) and the severity of stroke and in-hospital outcome in this population. We aimed to evaluate these associations in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Patients and methods: We prospectively studied 342 consecutive patients admitted for acute ischemic stroke (37.4 % males, mean age 78.8 ± 6.4 years). The severity of stroke was assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)and the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at admission. The outcome was assessed with the mRS and dependency (mRS 2 - 5) at discharge and in-hospital mortality. Results: An ABI ≤ 0.90 was present in 24.6 % of the patients whereas 68.1 % had ABI 0.91 - 1.40 and 7.3 % had ABI > 1.40. At admission, the NIHSS score did not differ between the 3 groups (10.4 ± 10.6, 8.3 ± 9.3 and 9.3 ± 9.4, respectively). The mRS score was also comparable in the 3 groups (3.6 ± 1.7, 3.1 ± 1.8 and 3.5 ± 2.3, respectively). At discharge, the mRS score did not differ between the 3 groups (2.9 ± 2.2, 2.3 ± 2.1 and 2.7 ± 2.5, respectively) and dependency rates were also comparable (59.5, 47.6 and 53.3 %, respectively). In-hospital mortality was almost two-times higher in patients with ABI ≤ 0.90 than in patients with ABI 0.91 - 1.40 or > 1.40 but this difference was not significant (10.9, 6.6 and 6.3 %, respectively). Conclusions: An ABI ≤ 0.90 or > 1.40 does not appear to be associated with more severe stroke or worse in-hospital outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Download Full-text

Secondary medical prevention in patients with peripheral arterial disease - Prescriptions of vascular surgeons and medical doctors (angiologists) in a multidisciplinary vascular centre

VASA ◽

10.1024/0301-1526/a000020 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 39 (2) ◽

pp. 145-152 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Klein-Weigel ◽

Gutsche-Petrak ◽

Wolbergs ◽

Köning ◽

Flessenkamper

Keyword(s):

Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Arterial Disease ◽

Disease Stage ◽

Channel Blockers ◽

Medical Doctors ◽

Vascular Surgeon ◽

Medical Prevention ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Peripheral Arterial

Background: We compared medical secondary prevention in patients with peripheral arterial disease stage II (Fontaine) located in the femoro-popliteal artery managed by vascular surgeons and medical doctors / angiologists in our multidisciplinary vascular center. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed demission protocols of in-hospital treatments between 01.01.2007 and 20.06.2008. Results: We surveyed 264 patients (54.2 % women; mean age 67.52 ± 8.98 yrs), 179 (67.8 %) primarily treated by medical doctors / angiologists and 85 (32.2 %) primarily managed by vascular surgeons. Medical doctors / angiologists treated more women (n = 109) than men (n = 34), (p = 0.002) and documented smoking and diabetes mellitus more often (p < 0.001) than vascular surgeons. Besides, patients had similar cardiovascular risk profiles and concomitant diseases, vascular surgeons prescribed 5.47 ± 2.26 drugs, medical doctors / angiologists 6.37 ± 2.67 (p = 0.005). Overall, 239 (90.5 %) patients were on aspirin, 180 (68.2 %) on clopidogrel, and 18 (6.9 %) on oral anticoagulants. Significantly more patients treated by medical doctors / angiologists received clopidogrel (169 versus 11; p < 0.001), significantly more surgical patients received oral anticoagulants (11 versus 7; p = 0.016). The number of patients without prescriptions for any antithrombotic therapy was 6 (6.9 %) in patients treated by vascular surgeons and 0 (0 %) in patients managed by medical doctors / angiologists (p = 0.001). Prescription-rates of β-blockers, ACE-inhibitors, Angiotensin II-antangonists, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics were statistically not different between the two disciplines, but statins were prescribed significantly more often by medical doctors / angiologists (139 versus 49; p < 0001). With the exceptions of Clopidogrel (women > men) and diuretics (men > women) we observed no gender-specific prescriptions. Conclusions: We observed high prescriptions rates of secondary medical prevention in patients primarily treated by medical doctors / angiologists and vascular surgeons. We believe that this result is highly influenced by our multidisciplinary approach. Nevertheless, efforts have to be made to raise vascular surgeons awareness of statin use and complete prescription of antithrombotic and antiplatelet drugs.

Download Full-text