scholarly journals The magnetic compass mechanisms of birds and rodents are based on different physical principles

2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. 583-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Thalau ◽  
Thorsten Ritz ◽  
Hynek Burda ◽  
Regina E Wegner ◽  
Roswitha Wiltschko
Keyword(s):  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Migratory Birds ◽  
Radical Pair ◽  
Broad Band ◽  
Static Field ◽  
Magnetic Compass ◽  
Radical Pair Mechanism ◽  
Zeeman Frequency ◽  
Compass Mechanisms ◽  
Physical Principles

Recently, oscillating magnetic fields in the MHz-range were introduced as a useful diagnostic tool to identify the mechanism underlying magnetoreception. The effect of very weak high-frequency fields on the orientation of migratory birds indicates that the avian magnetic compass is based on a radical pair mechanism. To analyse the nature of the magnetic compass of mammals, we tested rodents, Ansell's mole-rats, using their tendency to build their nests in the southern part of the arena as a criterion whether or not they could orient. In contrast to birds, their orientation was not disrupted when a broad-band field of 0.1–10 MHz of 85 nT or a 1.315 MHz field of 480 nT was added to the static geomagnetic field of 46 000 nT. Even increasing the intensity of the 1.315 MHz field (Zeeman frequency in the local geomagnetic field) to 4800 nT, more than a tenth of the static field, the mole-rats remained unaffected and continued to build their nests in the south. These results indicate that in contrast to that of birds, their magnetic compass does not involve radical pair processes; it seems to be based on a fundamentally different principle, which probably involves magnetite.

scholarly journals Cryptochrome expression in avian UV cones: revisiting the role of CRY1 as magnetoreceptor

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atticus Pinzon-Rodriguez ◽  
Rachel Muheim
Keyword(s):  
Zebra Finch ◽  
Migratory Birds ◽  
Radical Pair ◽  
Magnetic Compass ◽  
Radical Pair Mechanism ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Light Activation ◽  
Functional Changes ◽  
Circadian Expression

AbstractCryptochromes (CRY) have been proposed as putative magnetoreceptors in vertebrates. Localisation of CRY1 in the UV cones in the retinas of birds suggested that it could be the candidate magnetoreceptor. However, recent findings argue against this possibility. CRY1 is a type II cryptochrome, a subtype of cryptochromes that may not be inherently photosensitive, and it exhibits a clear circadian expression in the retinas of birds. Here, we reassessed the localisation and distribution of CRY1 in the retina of the zebra finch. Zebra finches have a light-dependent magnetic compass based on a radical-pair mechanism, similar to migratory birds. We found that CRY1 colocalised with the UV/V opsin (SWS1) in the outer segments of UV cones, but restricted to the tip of the segments. CRY1 was found in all UV cones across the entire retina, with the highest densities near the fovea. Pre-exposure of birds to different wavelengths of light did not result in any difference in CRY1 detection, suggesting that CRY1 did not undergo any detectable functional changes as result of light activation. Considering that CRY1 is likely not involved in magnetoreception, our findings open the possibility for an involvement in different, yet undetermined functions in the avian UV/V cones.

scholarly journals Compass magnetoreception in birds arising from photo-induced radical pairs in rotationally disordered cryptochromes

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (77) ◽  
pp. 3329-3337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason C. S. Lau ◽  
Christopher T. Rodgers ◽  
P. J. Hore
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Analysis ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Migratory Birds ◽  
Radical Pair ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Magnetic Compass ◽  
Radical Pairs ◽  
Molecular Precursors ◽  
Pair Model ◽  
Photochemical Transformations

According to the radical pair model, the magnetic compass sense of migratory birds relies on photochemical transformations in the eye to detect the direction of the geomagnetic field. Magnetically sensitive radical pairs are thought to be generated in cryptochrome proteins contained in magnetoreceptor cells in the retina. A prerequisite of the current model is for some degree of rotational ordering of both the cryptochromes within the cells and of the cells within the retina so that the directional responses of individual molecules do not average to zero. Here, it is argued that anisotropic distributions of radical pairs can be generated by the photoselection effects that arise from the directionality of the light entering the eye. Light-induced rotational order among the transient radical pairs rather than intrinsic ordering of their molecular precursors is seen as the fundamental condition for a magnetoreceptor cell to exhibit an anisotropic response. A theoretical analysis shows that a viable compass magnetoreceptor could result from randomly oriented cryptochromes contained in randomly oriented cells distributed around the retina.

scholarly journals Cryptochrome Expression in Avian UV Cones: Revisiting the Role of Cry1 As Magnetoreceptor

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atticus Pinzon-Rodriguez ◽  
Rachel Muheim
Keyword(s):  
Zebra Finch ◽  
Migratory Birds ◽  
Radical Pair ◽  
Magnetic Compass ◽  
Radical Pair Mechanism ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Light Activation ◽  
Functional Changes ◽  
Circadian Expression

Abstract Cryptochromes (Cry) have been proposed as putative magnetoreceptors in vertebrates. Localisation of Cry1 in the UV cones in the retinas of birds suggested that it could be the candidate magnetoreceptor. However, recent findings argue against this possibility. Cry1 is a type II cryptochrome, a subtype of cryptochromes that may not be inherently photosensitive, and it exhibits a clear circadian expression in the retinas of birds. Here, we reassessed the localization and distribution of Cry1 in the retina of the zebra finch. Zebra finches have a light-dependent magnetic compass based on a radical-pair mechanism, similar to migratory birds. We found that Cry1 colocalized with the UV/V opsin (SWS1) in the outer segments of UV cones, but restricted to the tip of the segments. Cry1 was expressed in all UV cones across the entire retina, with the highest densities near the fovea. Pre-exposure of birds to different wavelengths of light did not result in any difference in Cry1 expression, suggesting that Cry1 did not undergo any detectable functional changes as result of light activation. Considering that Cry1 is likely not involved in magnetoreception, our findings open the possibility for an involvement in different, yet undetermined functions in the avian UV/V cones.

Resonance effects indicate a radical-pair mechanism for avian magnetic compass

Nature ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 429 (6988) ◽  
pp. 177-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thorsten Ritz ◽  
Peter Thalau ◽  
John B. Phillips ◽  
Roswitha Wiltschko ◽  
Wolfgang Wiltschko
Keyword(s):  
Radical Pair ◽  
Magnetic Compass ◽  
Radical Pair Mechanism ◽  
Resonance Effects

scholarly journals Orientation cues and mechanisms used during avian navigation: A review

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 627-640
Author(s):  
Tushar Tyagi ◽  
Sanjay Kumar Bhardwaj
Keyword(s):  
Migratory Birds ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Magnetic Compass ◽  
Spatial Cues ◽  
Sun Compass ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Celestial Rotation ◽  
Compass Mechanisms ◽  
And Migration ◽  
Navigational Systems

The navigational systems of different animal species are by a wide margin less notable as compared to birds. Humans have been interested in how migratory birds discover their way more than thousands of miles for quite a long time. This review summarizes the cues and compass mechanisms applied in orientation and navigation by non-migrants, diurnal and nocturnal migrants. The magnetic compass, landmarks, olfactory, and memory of spatial cues en route were utilized in homing and migration. The equivalent is valid for the sun compass despite the fact that its job during migration might be undeniably less significant than commonly presumed. Stellar compass and celestial rotation, as a result of their nighttime accessibility, appear to influence the direction of nighttime migrants during the course of migration. The celestial cues go through notable changes because of the latitude shift during bird migration. Sunset cues alter their location with seasons and latitudes. The recognizable stars lose height and lastly vanish underneath the horizon, whereas new stars show up. These new ones must be calibrated. As celestial rotation not imparting a reference, it is not unexpected that the magnetic compass turns into the main cue that controls the directional importance of stars and sunset cues. Field studies have revealed that, in certain species, a considerable extent of individuals get back to similar breeding, overwintering, and stopover areas in progressive years. This review proposes that migratory birds have advanced uncommon cognitive capacities that empower them to achieve these accomplishments.      

scholarly journals Electromagnetic 0.1–100 kHz noise does not disrupt orientation in a night-migrating songbird implying a spin coherence lifetime of less than 10 µs

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (161) ◽  
pp. 20190716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry Kobylkov ◽  
Joe Wynn ◽  
Michael Winklhofer ◽  
Raisa Chetverikova ◽  
Jingjing Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electromagnetic Fields ◽  
Migratory Birds ◽  
Radical Pair ◽  
Coherence Time ◽  
Magnetic Compass ◽  
Radio Waves ◽  
Spin Coherence ◽  
Compass Orientation ◽  
Magnetic Compass Orientation ◽  
Migrating Birds

According to the currently prevailing theory, the magnetic compass sense in night-migrating birds relies on a light-dependent radical-pair-based mechanism. It has been shown that radio waves at megahertz frequencies disrupt magnetic orientation in migratory birds, providing evidence for a quantum-mechanical origin of the magnetic compass. Still, many crucial properties, e.g. the lifetime of the proposed magnetically sensitive radical pair, remain unknown. The current study aims to estimate the spin coherence time of the radical pair, based on the behavioural responses of migratory birds to broadband electromagnetic fields covering the frequency band 0.1–100 kHz. A finding that the birds were unable to use their magnetic compass under these conditions would imply surprisingly long-lived (greater than 10 µs) spin coherence. However, we observed no effect of 0.1–100 kHz radiofrequency (RF) fields on the orientation of night-migratory Eurasian blackcaps ( Sylvia atricapilla ). This suggests that the lifetime of the spin coherence involved in magnetoreception is shorter than the period of the highest frequency RF fields used in this experiment (i.e. approx. 10 µs). This result, in combination with an earlier study showing that 20–450 kHz electromagnetic fields disrupt magnetic compass orientation, suggests that the spin coherence lifetime of the magnetically sensitive radical pair is in the range 2–10 µs.

scholarly journals Avian magnetic compass can be tuned to anomalously low magnetic intensities

2013 ◽  
Vol 280 (1763) ◽  
pp. 20130853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Winklhofer ◽  
Evelyn Dylda ◽  
Peter Thalau ◽  
Wolfgang Wiltschko ◽  
Roswitha Wiltschko
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Exposure Time ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Compass ◽  
Radical Pair Mechanism ◽  
Compass Orientation ◽  
Directional Information ◽  
Total Exposure Time ◽  
Magnetic Compass Orientation ◽  
Local Intensity

The avian magnetic compass works in a fairly narrow functional window around the intensity of the local geomagnetic field, but adjusts to intensities outside this range when birds experience these new intensities for a certain time. In the past, the geomagnetic field has often been much weaker than at present. To find out whether birds can obtain directional information from a weak magnetic field, we studied spontaneous orientation preferences of migratory robins in a 4 µT field (i.e. a field of less than 10 per cent of the local intensity of 47 µT). Birds can adjust to this low intensity: they turned out to be disoriented under 4 µT after a pre-exposure time of 8 h to 4 µT, but were able to orient in this field after a total exposure time of 17 h. This demonstrates a considerable plasticity of the avian magnetic compass. Orientation in the 4 µT field was not affected by local anaesthesia of the upper beak, but was disrupted by a radiofrequency magnetic field of 1.315 MHz, 480 nT, suggesting that a radical-pair mechanism still provides the directional information in the low magnetic field. This is in agreement with the idea that the avian magnetic compass may have developed already in the Mesozoic in the common ancestor of modern birds.

scholarly journals A hierarchy of compass systems in migratory birds

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Pakhomov ◽  
Nikita Chernetsov
Keyword(s):  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Migratory Birds ◽  
Polarized Light ◽  
Magnetic Compass ◽  
Migratory Species ◽  
Previous Hypothesis ◽  
Orientation Information ◽  
Different Sources ◽  
Migratory Period ◽  
Cue Conflict

Migratory birds use several different sources of orientation information. They have at least three compass systems based on different cues: the sun and polarized light, the stars and their constellations, and the geomagnetic field. The concurrent information obtained from these three compasses is redundant, therefore the compasses need to have a hierarchy and must be calibrated relative to each other. One of the compasses should dominate the others, or some orientation cue should be used to calibrate the remaining compass systems. Results of experiments on a variety of songbird species demonstrate that while astronomical cues calibrate the magnetic compass during the pre-migratory period, strategies used during the migratory period are more diverse. In the present review, we analyze the results of all crucial cue-conflict studies, mostly performed in nocturnal songbird migrants; we also try to understand why some migratory species calibrate their magnetic compass on sunset cues while others use the geomagnetic field or stars as a primary cue source, and we examine why the previous hypothesis could not explain the findings of all cue-conflict experiments.

scholarly journals The quantum needle of the avian magnetic compass

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (17) ◽  
pp. 4634-4639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamish G. Hiscock ◽  
Susannah Worster ◽  
Daniel R. Kattnig ◽  
Charlotte Steers ◽  
Ye Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Migratory Birds ◽  
Radical Pair ◽  
Spin Dynamics ◽  
Energy Levels ◽  
Magnetic Compass ◽  
Spin Coherence ◽  
Radical Pairs ◽  
Sharp Feature ◽  
In The Wild ◽  
Dynamics Simulations

Migratory birds have a light-dependent magnetic compass, the mechanism of which is thought to involve radical pairs formed photochemically in cryptochrome proteins in the retina. Theoretical descriptions of this compass have thus far been unable to account for the high precision with which birds are able to detect the direction of the Earth's magnetic field. Here we use coherent spin dynamics simulations to explore the behavior of realistic models of cryptochrome-based radical pairs. We show that when the spin coherence persists for longer than a few microseconds, the output of the sensor contains a sharp feature, referred to as a spike. The spike arises from avoided crossings of the quantum mechanical spin energy-levels of radicals formed in cryptochromes. Such a feature could deliver a heading precision sufficient to explain the navigational behavior of migratory birds in the wild. Our results (i) afford new insights into radical pair magnetoreception, (ii) suggest ways in which the performance of the compass could have been optimized by evolution, (iii) may provide the beginnings of an explanation for the magnetic disorientation of migratory birds exposed to anthropogenic electromagnetic noise, and (iv) suggest that radical pair magnetoreception may be more of a quantum biology phenomenon than previously realized.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document