A young Moon-forming giant impact at 70–110 million years accompanied by late-stage mixing, core formation and degassing of the Earth

2008 ◽  
Vol 366 (1883) ◽  
pp. 4163-4181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex N Halliday
Keyword(s):  
Isotopic Composition ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Lunar Crust ◽  
Core Formation ◽  
Volatile Elements ◽  
Giant Impact ◽  
Isotope Data ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Isotopic Effects ◽  
Late Veneer

New W isotope data for lunar metals demonstrate that the Moon formed late in isotopic equilibrium with the bulk silicate Earth (BSE). On this basis, lunar Sr isotope data are used to define the former composition of the Earth and hence the Rb–Sr age of the Moon, which is 4.48±0.02 Ga, or 70–110 Ma (million years) after the start of the Solar System. This age is significantly later than had been deduced from W isotopes based on model assumptions or isotopic effects now known to be cosmogenic. The Sr age is in excellent agreement with earlier estimates based on the time of lunar Pb loss and the age of the early lunar crust (4.46±0.04 Ga). Similar ages for the BSE are recorded by xenon and lead–lead, providing evidence of catastrophic terrestrial degassing, atmospheric blow-off and significant late core formation accompanying the ca 100 Ma giant impact. Agreement between the age of the Moon based on the Earth's Rb/Sr and the lead–lead age of the Moon is consistent with no major losses of moderately volatile elements from the Earth during the giant impact. The W isotopic composition of the BSE can be explained by end member models of (i) gradual accretion with a mean life of roughly 35 Ma or (ii) rapid growth with a mean life of roughly 10 Ma, followed by a significant hiatus prior to the giant impact. The former assumes that approximately 60 per cent of the incoming metal from impactors is added directly to the core during accretion. The latter includes complete mixing of all the impactor material into the BSE during accretion. The identical W isotopic composition of the Moon and the BSE limits the amount of material that can be added as a late veneer to the Earth after the giant impact to less than 0.3±0.3 per cent of ordinary chondrite or less than 0.5±0.6 per cent CI carbonaceous chondrite based on their known W isotopic compositions. Neither of these on their own is sufficient to explain the inventories of both refractory siderophiles such as platinum group elements and rhenium, and volatiles such as sulphur, carbon and water.

scholarly journals Evaporative fractionation of volatile stable isotopes and their bearing on the origin of the Moon

2014 ◽  
Vol 372 (2024) ◽  
pp. 20130259 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. D. Day ◽  
Frederic Moynier
Keyword(s):  
Global Scale ◽  
Parent Body ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Magma Ocean ◽  
Volatile Elements ◽  
Giant Impact ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Present Distribution ◽  
Volatile Loss

The Moon is depleted in volatile elements relative to the Earth and Mars. Low abundances of volatile elements, fractionated stable isotope ratios of S, Cl, K and Zn, high μ ( 238 U/ 204 Pb) and long-term Rb/Sr depletion are distinguishing features of the Moon, relative to the Earth. These geochemical characteristics indicate both inheritance of volatile-depleted materials that formed the Moon and planets and subsequent evaporative loss of volatile elements that occurred during lunar formation and differentiation. Models of volatile loss through localized eruptive degassing are not consistent with the available S, Cl, Zn and K isotopes and abundance data for the Moon. The most probable cause of volatile depletion is global-scale evaporation resulting from a giant impact or a magma ocean phase where inefficient volatile loss during magmatic convection led to the present distribution of volatile elements within mantle and crustal reservoirs. Problems exist for models of planetary volatile depletion following giant impact. Most critically, in this model, the volatile loss requires preferential delivery and retention of late-accreted volatiles to the Earth compared with the Moon. Different proportions of late-accreted mass are computed to explain present-day distributions of volatile and moderately volatile elements (e.g. Pb, Zn; 5 to >10%) relative to highly siderophile elements (approx. 0.5%) for the Earth. Models of early magma ocean phases may be more effective in explaining the volatile loss. Basaltic materials (e.g. eucrites and angrites) from highly differentiated airless asteroids are volatile-depleted, like the Moon, whereas the Earth and Mars have proportionally greater volatile contents. Parent-body size and the existence of early atmospheres are therefore likely to represent fundamental controls on planetary volatile retention or loss.

scholarly journals The origin of the Moon’s Earth-like tungsten isotopic composition from dynamical and geochemical modeling

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca A. Fischer ◽  
Nicholas G. Zube ◽  
Francis Nimmo
Keyword(s):  
Stable Isotopes ◽  
Isotopic Composition ◽  
Geochemical Modeling ◽  
Joint Probability ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Canonical Models ◽  
Giant Impact ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Isotopic Evolution ◽  
Low Probability

AbstractThe Earth and Moon have identical or very similar isotopic compositions for many elements, including tungsten. However, canonical models of the Moon-forming impact predict that the Moon should be made mostly of material from the impactor, Theia. Here we evaluate the probability of the Moon inheriting its Earth-like tungsten isotopes from Theia in the canonical giant impact scenario, using 242 N-body models of planetary accretion and tracking tungsten isotopic evolution, and find that this probability is <1.6–4.7%. Mixing in up to 30% terrestrial materials increases this probability, but it remains <10%. Achieving similarity in stable isotopes is also a low-probability outcome, and is controlled by different mechanisms than tungsten. The Moon’s stable isotopes and tungsten isotopic composition are anticorrelated due to redox effects, lowering the joint probability to significantly less than 0.08–0.4%. We therefore conclude that alternate explanations for the Moon’s isotopic composition are likely more plausible.

scholarly journals Geochemical arguments for an Earth-like Moon-forming impactor

2014 ◽  
Vol 372 (2024) ◽  
pp. 20130244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Dauphas ◽  
Christoph Burkhardt ◽  
Paul H. Warren ◽  
Teng Fang-Zhen
Keyword(s):  
Isotopic Composition ◽  
Solar Nebula ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Inversion Method ◽  
Stage Model ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Geochemical Evidence ◽  
Giant Impact ◽  
The Earth

Geochemical evidence suggests that the material accreted by the Earth did not change in nature during Earth's accretion, presumably because the inner protoplanetary disc had uniform isotopic composition similar to enstatite chondrites, aubrites and ungrouped achondrite NWA 5363/5400. Enstatite meteorites and the Earth were derived from the same nebular reservoir but diverged in their chemical evolutions, so no chondrite sample in meteorite collections is representative of the Earth's building blocks. The similarity in isotopic composition (Δ 17 O, ε 50 Ti and ε 54 Cr) between lunar and terrestrial rocks is explained by the fact that the Moon-forming impactor came from the same region of the disc as other Earth-forming embryos, and therefore was similar in isotopic composition to the Earth. The heavy δ 30 Si values of the silicate Earth and the Moon relative to known chondrites may be due to fractionation in the solar nebula/protoplanetary disc rather than partitioning of silicon in Earth's core. An inversion method is presented to calculate the Hf/W ratios and ε 182 W values of the proto-Earth and impactor mantles for a given Moon-forming impact scenario. The similarity in tungsten isotopic composition between lunar and terrestrial rocks is a coincidence that can be explained in a canonical giant impact scenario if an early formed embryo (two-stage model age of 10–20 Myr) collided with the proto-Earth formed over a more protracted accretion history (two-stage model age of 30–40 Myr).

scholarly journals Isotopic evidence for the formation of the Moon in a canonical giant impact

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sune G. Nielsen ◽  
David V. Bekaert ◽  
Maureen Auro
Keyword(s):  
Solar System ◽  
Isotope Fractionation ◽  
Main Stage ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Giant Impact ◽  
Bulk Silicate Earth ◽  
The Earth ◽  
The Standard Model ◽  
Isotopic Measurements ◽  
Origin Of The Moon

AbstractIsotopic measurements of lunar and terrestrial rocks have revealed that, unlike any other body in the solar system, the Moon is indistinguishable from the Earth for nearly every isotopic system. This observation, however, contradicts predictions by the standard model for the origin of the Moon, the canonical giant impact. Here we show that the vanadium isotopic composition of the Moon is offset from that of the bulk silicate Earth by 0.18 ± 0.04 parts per thousand towards the chondritic value. This offset most likely results from isotope fractionation on proto-Earth during the main stage of terrestrial core formation (pre-giant impact), followed by a canonical giant impact where ~80% of the Moon originates from the impactor of chondritic composition. Our data refute the possibility of post-giant impact equilibration between the Earth and Moon, and implies that the impactor and proto-Earth mainly accreted from a common isotopic reservoir in the inner solar system.

scholarly journals Boundary conditions for the formation of the Moon

2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Reuver ◽  
R.J. de Meijer ◽  
I.L. ten Kate ◽  
W. van Westrenen
Keyword(s):  
Angular Momentum ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Total Angular Momentum ◽  
Nuclear Explosion ◽  
Moment Of Inertia ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Moon System ◽  
Giant Impact ◽  
The Earth ◽  
The Impact

AbstractRecent measurements of the chemical and isotopic composition of lunar samples indicate that the Moon's bulk composition shows great similarities with the composition of the silicate Earth. Moon formation models that attempt to explain these similarities make a wide variety of assumptions about the properties of the Earth prior to the formation of the Moon (the proto-Earth), and about the necessity and properties of an impactor colliding with the proto-Earth. This paper investigates the effects of the proto-Earth's mass, oblateness and internal core-mantle differentiation on its moment of inertia. The ratio of angular momentum and moment of inertia determines the stability of the proto-Earth and the binding energy, i.e. the energy needed to make the transition from an initial state in which the system is a rotating single body with a certain angular momentum to a final state with two bodies (Earth and Moon) with the same total angular momentum, redistributed between Earth and Moon. For the initial state two scenarios are being investigated: a homogeneous (undifferentiated) proto-Earth and a proto-Earth differentiated in a central metallic and an outer silicate shell; for both scenarios a range of oblateness values is investigated. Calculations indicate that a differentiated proto-Earth would become unstable at an angular momentum L that exceeds the total angular momentum of the present-day Earth–Moon system (L0) by factors of 2.5–2.9, with the precise maximum dependent on the proto-Earth's oblateness. Further limitations are imposed by the Roche limit and the logical condition that the separated Earth–Moon system should be formed outside the proto-Earth. This further limits the L values of the Earth–Moon system to a maximum of about L/L0 = 1.5, at a minimum oblateness (a/c ratio) of 1.2. These calculations provide boundary conditions for the main classes of Moon-forming models. Our results show that at the high values of L used in recent giant impact models (1.8 < L/L0 < 3.1), the proposed proto-Earths are unstable before (Cuk & Stewart, 2012) or immediately after (Canup, 2012) the impact, even at a high oblateness (the most favourable condition for stability). We conclude that the recent attempts to improve the classic giant impact hypothesis by studying systems with very high values of L are not supported by the boundary condition calculations in this work. In contrast, this work indicates that the nuclear explosion model for Moon formation (De Meijer et al., 2013) fulfills the boundary conditions and requires approximately one order of magnitude less energy than originally estimated. Hence in our view the nuclear explosion model is presently the model that best explains the formation of the Moon from predominantly terrestrial silicate material.

Chemical composition of the Moon's 'primary' crust – a clue at a terrestrial origin

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey Vorburger ◽  
Peter Wurz ◽  
Manuel Scherf ◽  
Helmut Lammer ◽  
André Galli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lunar Surface ◽  
Major Elements ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Lunar Crust ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Origin And Evolution ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Terrestrial Origin ◽  
In The Beginning

&lt;p&gt;The Moon is one of the best characterized objects in space science, yet its origin still actively researched. Available orbital, geophysical, and geochemical information imposes clear restrictions on the origin and evolution of the Earth-Moon system (e.g., Canup 2008, 2012; &amp;#262;uk and Stewart 2012; Young et al. 2016). In regard to geochemical constraints, one of the most puzzling conundrums is posed by the similar isotopic fingerprints of the Earth and the Moon (e.g., Wiechert et al. 2001; Armytage et al. 2012; Zhang et al. 2012; Young et al. 2016; Schiller et al. 2018), together with the apparent lunar depletion in volatile elements (e.g., Ringwood and Kesson 1977; Wanke et al. 1977; Albar&amp;#232;de et al. 2015; Taylor 2014). This apparent lunar volatile depletion is most notable in the low K content in comparison to U, a finding based on chemical analyses of samples collected from the lunar surface and lunar meteorites, and on spectroscopic observations of the lunar near-surface, despite both having been heavily processed in the past ~ 4.4 billion years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the past 4.4 billion years, space has been a harsh environment for our Moon, especially in the beginning, when the young Sun was still very active and the young Moon was continuously bombarded by meteorites of varying sizes. Solar wind and micro-meteoritic interactions with the lunar surface led to rapid and intensive processing of the lunar crust. Hence, the K/U depletion trend observable on today's lunar surface does not necessarily reflect a K/U ratio valid for the Moon in its entirety. We model the evolution of the abundances of the major elements over the past 4.3 to 4.4 billion years to derive the composition of the original lunar crust. Accounting for this processing, our model results show that the original crust is much less depleted in volatiles than the surface observable today, exhibiting a K/U ratio compatible with Earth and the other terrestrial planets, which strengthens the theory of a terrestrial origin for the Moon.&lt;/p&gt;

The Earth-Moon Connection

1989 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 891-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Ringwood
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Relationship ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Core Formation ◽  
Earth’S Mantle ◽  
Terrestrial Atmosphere ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Siderophile Elements ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Close Genetic Relationship

Abstract The early thermal state of the Earth provides important constraints on hypotheses relating to its origin and its connection with the Moon. The currently popular giant impact hypothesis of lunar origin requires the Earth’s mantle to have been completely melted during the impact. Differentiation of a molten mantle would have produced strong chemical and mineralogical stratification, causing the mantle to become gravitationally stable and resistant to convective rehomogenization. The resulting composition and mineralogy of the upper mantle and primitive crust would have been dramatically different from those which have existed during the past 3.8 b. y. It is concluded that the Earth’s mantle was not extensively melted at the conclusion of accretion of the planet and therefore the hypothesis that the Moon was formed by the impact of a martian-sized planetesimal on the proto-Earth is probably incorrect. Nevertheless, a wide range of geochemical evidence demonstrates the existence of a close genetic relationship between the Moon and the Earth’s mantle. The key evidence relates to the processes of core formation in planetary bodies and resultant abundance patterns of siderophile elements which remain in their silicate mantles. Because of the complexity of the core formation process within a given body and the multiplicity of chemical and physical processes involved, the mantle siderophile signature is expected to be a unique characteristic. Thus, the siderophile signatures of Mars and of the eucrite parent body are quite distinct from that of the Earth’s mantle. Lunar siderophile geochemistry is reviewed in detail. It is demonstrated that a large group of siderophile elements display similar abundances in the terrestrial and lunar mantles. The similarity implies that a major proportion of the material now in the Moon was derived from the Earth’s mantle after core formation. This implication, however, does not require that the bulk compositions of the lunar and terrestrial mantles should be essentially identical, as is often assumed. Factors which may contribute to significant compositional differences between the two bodies within the context of a close genetic relationship are reviewed. The most promising mechanism for removing terrestrial material from the Earth’s mantle arises from the impacts of a number of large (0.001 to 0.01 ME) but not giant (≥ 0.1 ME) planetesimals after core formation and at the terminal stage of the Earth’s accretion. These impacts evaporated several times their own masses of mantle material and shock-melted considerably more. However, they did not lead to complete or extensive (e.g. > 50%) melting of the entire mantle. Impact-generated clouds of shock-melted spray and vapours were accelerated to high velocities in the presence of a primitive terrestrial atmosphere that co-rotated with the Earth. This provided an effective means of transferring angular momentum from the Earth to the ejected material which condensed to form a ring of Earth-orbiting planetesimals and moonlets. The Moon was formed by coagulation from material derived from the outer regions of this ring. Accretion of the Earth in the presence of the gases of the solar nebula and the co-rotating primitive terrestrial atmosphere may also have provided a mechanism for generating the rapid prograde spin of the proto-Earth.

Volatile elements on the earth and the moon

1971 ◽  
Vol 11 (1-5) ◽  
pp. 219-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Wasson
Keyword(s):  
The Moon ◽  
Volatile Elements ◽  
The Earth

Constitution of terrestrial planets

1981 ◽  
Vol 303 (1477) ◽  
pp. 287-302 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Bulk Composition ◽  
Parent Body ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Volatile Elements ◽  
Earth’S Mantle ◽  
The Earth ◽  
History Of ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
Reduced State

Reliable estimates of the bulk composition are so far restricted to the three planetary objects from which we have samples for laboratory investigation, i.e. the Earth, the Moon and the eucrite parent asteroid. The last, the parent body of the eucrite— diogenite family of meteorites, an object that like Earth and Moon underwent magmatic differentiations, seems to have an almost chondritic composition except for a considerable depletion of all moderately volatile (Na, K, Rb, F, etc.) and highly volatile (Cl, Br, Cd, Pb, etc.) elements. The Moon is also depleted in moderately volatile and volatile elements compared to carbonaceous chondrites of type 1 (Cl) and also compared to the Earth. Again normalized to Cl and Si the Earth’s mantle and the Moon are slightly enriched in refractory lithophile elements and in magnesium. It might be that this enrichment is fictitious and only due to the normalization to Si and that both Earth’s mantle and Moon are depleted in Si, which partly entered the Earth’s core in metallic form. The striking depletion of the Earth’s mantle for the elements V, Cr and Mn can also be explained by their partial removal into the core. The similar abundances of V, Cr and Mn in the Moon and in the Earth’s mantle indicate the strong genetic relationship of Earth and Moon. Apart from their contents of metallic iron, all siderophile elements, moderately volatile and volatile elements, Earth and Moon are chemically very similar. It might well be that, with these exceptions and that of a varying degree of oxidation, all the inner planets have a similar chemistry. The chemical composition of the Earth’s mantle, for which reliable and accurate data have recently been obtained from the study of ultramafic nodules, yields important information about the accretion history of the Earth and that of the inner planets. It seems that accretion started with highly reduced material, with all Fe as metal and even Si and Cr, V and Mn partly in reduced state, followed by the accretion of more and more oxidized matter.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document