In a paper read before the Royal Society, May 1874, I pointed out that the upward diminution of temperature in the atmosphere (known to exist under certain circumstances) must refract and give an upward direction to the rays of sound which would otherwise proceed horizontally; and it was suggested that this might he the cause of the observed difference in the distinctness with which similar sounds are heard on different occasions, particularly the very marked advantage which night has over day in this respect. At the time at which that paper was written no direct experiments or observations had been made to verify the truth of this suggestion, and therefore its probability rested on its reasonableness. Since that time, however, I have carried out a series of observations and experiments which, although far from complete, throw some light on the subject, besides revealing some remarkable facts. I hope to be able to continue the investigation; but since its nature is such as to render the chance of bringing it to any thing like a final conclusion very uncertain, it seems to me that it may be well to publish an account of what has been already done; and this is the object of the present communication. In order to render the object of the various experiments clear, it may be well to recapitulate here some of the theoretical considerations previously explained. It will be remembered that the idea that the variations of temperature would cause refraction of sound occurred to me while making experiments on the effect of wind upon sound, from which it was shown that when sound proceeds in a direction contrary to that of the wind, it is not, as had been thought, destroyed or stopped by the wind, but that it is lifted, and that at sufficiently high elevations it can be heard to as great distances as in other directions, or as when there is no wind—thus confirming the hypothesis first propounded by Professor Stokes and afterwards by myself, that the effect is owing to the retardation of the velocity of the wind near the earth, which allows the sound moving against the wind to move faster below than above, and thus causes the fronts of the waves to incline upwards, and consequently to move in that direction. Having clearly shown that this was the case, it became apparent that any thing which would cause an upward diminution in the velocity at which sound proceeds would cause a similar effect to that of the wind and lift the sound, and that since the speed of the sound depends on the temperature of the air in which it is moving, an upward diminution in the temperature must cause such an effect. That such a diminution of temperature does very often exist was proved by Mr. Glaisher’s balloon ascents in 1862, in which he found that when cloudy the mean rate of diminution for the first 300 feet was 0°·5 for each 100 feet, and that when clear it was 1°, and that on some occasions it was greater and on others less than this. A variation of 1° in the temperature of the air alters the velocity of sound nearly 1 foot per second, so that with a clear sky the sound instead of moving horizontally would move upwards on a circle of 110,000 feet radius, and with a cloudy sky on a scale of 220,000 feet radius. This rate of refraction is very small compared with that caused even by a very moderate wind; and consequently in order to verify it by experiment it is necessary to observe sounds at much greater distances. This renders the experiment very difficult to carry out; and to make it worse we have no means of determining what the upward variation of temperature is, which therefore can only be surmised by the behaviour of the sound.
IX. The araucarieæ, recent and extinct