scholarly journals Generalised Complementarity Analysis: identifying the most precious places for the conservation of Species, Functional and Phylogenetic Diversity

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Anthony Nipperess

AbstractThe most precious places for conservation are those that make the largest contribution to regional, national or global biodiversity. The two key concepts for determining the contribution of a specific site are Complementarity (the gain in diversity achieved when adding that site to a set of other sites) and Irreplaceability (here defined as the overall complementarity of that site when compared to a range of possible combinations of other sites). Generalised Complementarity Analysis (GCA) is a mathematical framework that provides an exact analytical solution for the expected complementarity (gain in diversity) of a focal site, when added to a set of other sites of a given size (m). Diversity is defined very generally to allow for complementarity to be calculated for species richness, Functional Diversity or Phylogenetic Diversity. The expected irreplaceability of a focal site is then defined in GCA as the area under the curve of expected complementarity values for all possible values of m. GCA is much more computationally efficient than existing algorithmic approaches and is scalable to very large numbers of sites. Because complementarity and irreplaceability are calculated for all possible combinations of sites, GCA serves as a null model for systematic conservation planning algorithms that seek to optimise site selection. However, because truly irreplaceable sites remain so under all possible site selections, GCA is a powerful conservation planning tool in its own right, providing an efficient means of identifying the world’s most precious places for conservation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginie Marques ◽  
Paul Castagné ◽  
Andréa Polanco Fernández ◽  
Giomar Helena Borrero‐Pérez ◽  
Régis Hocdé ◽  
...  




2021 ◽  
pp. gr.275777.121
Author(s):  
George W Armstrong ◽  
Kalen Cantrell ◽  
Shi Huang ◽  
Daniel McDonald ◽  
Niina Haiminen ◽  
...  

The number of publicly available microbiome samples is continually growing. As dataset size increases, bottlenecks arise in standard analytical pipelines. Faith’s phylogenetic diversity is a highly utilized phylogenetic alpha diversity metric that has thus far failed to effectively scale to trees with millions of vertices. Stacked Faith's Phylogenetic Diversity (SFPhD) enables calculation of this widely adopted diversity metric at a much larger scale by implementing a computationally efficient algorithm. The algorithm reduces the amount of computational resources required, resulting in more accessible software with a reduced carbon footprint, as compared to previous approaches. The new algorithm produces identical results to the previous method. We further demonstrate that the phylogenetic aspect of Faith's PD provides increased power in detecting diversity differences between younger and older populations in the FINRISK study's metagenomic data.



2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (9) ◽  
pp. 4464-4470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Harrison ◽  
Marko J. Spasojevic ◽  
Daijiang Li

Climate strongly shapes plant diversity over large spatial scales, with relatively warm and wet (benign, productive) regions supporting greater numbers of species. Unresolved aspects of this relationship include what causes it, whether it permeates to community diversity at smaller spatial scales, whether it is accompanied by patterns in functional and phylogenetic diversity as some hypotheses predict, and whether it is paralleled by climate-driven changes in diversity over time. Here, studies of Californian plants are reviewed and new analyses are conducted to synthesize climate–diversity relationships in space and time. Across spatial scales and organizational levels, plant diversity is maximized in more productive (wetter) climates, and these consistent spatial relationships are mirrored in losses of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity over time during a recent climatic drying trend. These results support the tolerance and climatic niche conservatism hypotheses for climate–diversity relationships, and suggest there is some predictability to future changes in diversity in water-limited climates.







PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e115132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria G. Asmyhr ◽  
Simon Linke ◽  
Grant Hose ◽  
David A. Nipperess


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document