scholarly journals The fronto-parietal network connects more strongly to central than peripheral V1

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Sims ◽  
Pinar Demirayak ◽  
Simone Cedotal ◽  
Kristina Visscher

ABSTRACTCentral and peripheral vision are important for distinct aspects of everyday life. We use central vision to read and peripheral vision to get the gist of a scene. To understand how these differences are reflected in connectivity between V1 and higher-order cognitive areas, we examined the differential connectivity of V1 that represent central and peripheral vision. We used diffusion-weighted-imaging and resting-state blood-oxygen-level-dependent data to examine structural and functional connectivity. The present results demonstrate strong evidence that centrally-representing portions of V1 are more strongly functionally and structurally connected to the fronto-parietal network than are peripherally representing portions of V1. This suggests that these patterns of connections between central V1 and the fronto-parietal network are direct and support attention-demanding visual tasks. Overall, our findings contribute to understanding how the human brain processes visual information and forms a baseline for any modifications in processing that might occur with training or experience.

2016 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 806-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorn Fierstra ◽  
Jan-Karl Burkhardt ◽  
Christiaan Hendrik Bas van Niftrik ◽  
Marco Piccirelli ◽  
Athina Pangalu ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 272 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Jung Yang ◽  
Roya Yumul ◽  
Richard Tang ◽  
Ivan Cokic ◽  
Michael Klein ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taishi Hosaka ◽  
Marino Kimura ◽  
Yuko Yotsumoto

AbstractWe have a keen sensitivity when it comes to the perception of our own voices. We can detect not only the differences between ourselves and others, but also slight modifications of our own voices. Here, we examined the neural correlates underlying such sensitive perception of one’s own voice. In the experiments, we modified the subjects’ own voices by using five types of filters. The subjects rated the similarity of the presented voices to their own. We compared BOLD (Blood Oxygen Level Dependent) signals between the voices that subjects rated as least similar to their own voice and those they rated as most similar. The contrast revealed that the bilateral superior temporal gyrus exhibited greater activities while listening to the voice least similar to their own voice and lesser activation while listening to the voice most similar to their own. Our results suggest that the superior temporal gyrus is involved in neural sharpening for the own-voice. The lesser degree of activations observed by the voices that were similar to the own-voice indicates that these areas not only respond to the differences between self and others, but also respond to the finer details of own-voices.


2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Bernhardt ◽  
Axel Bornstedt ◽  
Jochen Spiess ◽  
Vinzenz Hombach ◽  
Volker Rasche

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1125-1132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kejia Cai ◽  
Adam Shore ◽  
Anup Singh ◽  
Mohammad Haris ◽  
Teruyuki Hiraki ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1760 ◽  
pp. 147390
Author(s):  
Nathalie Just ◽  
Hans Adriaensen ◽  
Arsène Ella ◽  
Pierre-Marie Chevillard ◽  
Martine Batailler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document