scholarly journals The impact of the fragile health system on the implementation of health policies in Yemen

Author(s):  
Taha Hussein ◽  
Fekri Dureab ◽  
Raof Al-Waziza ◽  
Hanan Noman ◽  
Lisa Hennig ◽  
...  

The on-going humanitarian crisis in Yemen is one of the worst in the world, with more than14 million people in acute need. The conflict in Yemen deteriorated the already fragile health system and lead to the collapse of more than half of the health facilities. Health system fragmentation is also a problem in Yemen, which is complicated by the existence of two health ministries with different strategies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of health system fragmentation on the implementation of health policies in Yemen across the global agendas of Universal Health Coverage (UHC), Health Security (GHS) and Health Promotion (HP) in the context of WHO priorities achieving universal health coverage, addressing health emergencies and promoting healthier populations. Methods The study is qualitative research using key informant in-depth interviews and documents analysis. Results There are many health stakeholders in Yemen, including the public, private, and NGO sectors - each with different priorities and interests, which did not always align with national policies and strategies. The WHO and Ministry of Public Health and Population (MoPHP) are the main supporters to implement all policies related to the UHC, GHS and HP agendas. Interestingly, initiatives initially pursuing a health security approach to control the cholera epidemic realigned with the UHC concept and moved from an initial focus on health security, to propose a minimum health service package, a classical UHC intervention. Overall, Universal Health Coverage is the most adapted agenda, health security agendas were highly disrupted due to conflicts and health staffs were caught unprepared for emerging outbreaks. The health promotion agenda was largely ignored. Conclusion Restoring peace, building on synergies between the three health agendas through joint planning between the MoPHP and other health actors are highly recommended.

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amare Worku Tadesse ◽  
Kassu Ketema Gurmu ◽  
Selamawit Tesfaye Kebede ◽  
Mahlet Kifle Habtemariam

Abstract Background Evidence exists about synergies among universal health coverage, health security and health promotion. Uniting these three global agendas has brought success to the country’s health sector. This study aimed to document the efforts Ethiopia has made to apply nationally synergistic approaches uniting these three global health agendas. Our study is part of the Lancet Commission on synergies between these global agendas. Methods We employed a case study design to describe the synergistic process in the Ethiopian health system based on a review of national strategies and policy documents, and key informant interviews with current and former policymakers, and academics. We analyzed the “hardware” (using the World Health Organization’s building blocks) and the “software” (ideas, interests, and power relations) of the Ethiopian health system according to the aforementioned three global agendas. Results Fragmentation of health system primarily manifested as inequities in access to health services, low health workforce and limited capacity to implementation guidelines. Donor driven vertical programs, multiple modalities of health financing, and inadequate multisectoral collaborations were also found to be key features of fragmentation. Several approaches were found to be instrumental in fostering synergies within the global health agenda. These included strong political and technical leadership within the government, transparent coordination, and engagement of stakeholders in the process of priority setting and annual resource mapping. Furthermore, harmonization and alignment of the national strategic plan with international commitments, joint financial arrangements with stakeholders and standing partnership platforms facilitated efforts for synergy. Conclusions Ethiopia has implemented multiple approaches to overcome fragmentation. Such synergistic efforts of the primary global health agendas have made significant contributions to the improvement of the country’s health indicators and may promote sustained functionality of the health system.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mário Fabrício Fleury Rosa ◽  
Everton Nunes da Silva ◽  
Christina Pacheco ◽  
Marcos Vinícius Pereira Diógenes ◽  
Christopher Millett ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has spread throughout more than 160 countries, infecting millions of people worldwide. To address this health emergency, countries have organized the flow of production and innovation to reduce the impact on health. This article shows the response of the Brazilian scientific community to meet the urgent needs of the public unified health system [SUS], aiming to guarantee universal access to an estimated population of 211 million. By December 2020, Brazil had recorded more than six million cases and approximately 175,000 deaths. Methods We collected data on research, development and innovation projects carried out by 114 public universities (plus Oswaldo Cruz Foundation [Fiocruz] and Butantan Institute), as reported on their websites. Additionally, we examined the studies on COVID-19 approved by the National Comission for Research Ethics, as well as those reported on the Ministry of Education website as of May 15, 2020. Results The 789 identified projects were classified according to research categories as follows: development and innovation (n = 280), other types of projects (n = 226), epidemiologic research (n = 211), and basic research on disease mechanisms (n = 72). Most proposals focused on the development and innovation of personal protective equipment, medical devices, diagnostic tests, medicines and vaccines, which were rapidly identified as research priorities by the scientific community. Some promising results have been observed from phase III vaccine trials, one of which is conducted in partnership with Oxford University and another of which is performed with Sinovac Biotech. Both trials involve thousands of volunteers in their Brazilian arms and include technology transfer agreements with Fiocruz and the Butantan Institute, respectively. These vaccines proved to be safe and effective and were immediately licensed for emergency use. The provision of doses for the public health system, and vaccination, started on January 17, 2021. Conclusions The mobilized Brazilian scientific community has generated comprehensive research, development and innovation proposals to meet the most urgent needs. It is important to emphasize that this response was only possible due to decades of investment in research, development and innovation in Brazil. We need to reinforce and protect the Brazilian science, technology and innovation system from austerity policies that disregard health and knowledge as crucial investments for Brazilian society, in line with the constitutional right of universal health access and universal health coverage.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Pfeiffer ◽  
Rachel R. Chapman

AbstractIn many African countries, hundreds of health-related NGOs are fed by a chaotic tangle of donor funding streams. The case of Mozambique illustrates how this NGO model impedes Universal Health Coverage. In the 1990s, NGOs multiplied across post-war Mozambique: the country’s structural adjustment program constrained public and foreign aid expenditures on the public health system, while donors favored private contractors and NGOs. In the 2000s, funding for HIV/AIDS and other vertical aid from many donors increased dramatically. In 2004, the United States introduced PEPFAR in Mozambique at nearly 500 million USD per year, roughly equivalent to the entire budget of the Ministry of Health. To be sure, PEPFAR funding has helped thousands access antiretroviral treatment, but over 90% of resources flow “off-budget” to NGO “implementing partners,” with little left for the public health system. After a decade of this major donor funding to NGOs, public sector health system coverage had barely changed. In 2014, the workforce/ population ratio was still among the five worst in the world at 71/10000; the health facility/per capita ratio worsened since 2009 to only 1 per 16,795. Achieving UHC will require rejection of austerity constraints on public sector health systems, and rechanneling of aid to public systems building rather than to NGOs.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felana Angella Ihantamalala ◽  
Matthew H. Bonds ◽  
Mauricianot Randriamihaja ◽  
Luc Rakotonirina ◽  
Vincent Herbreteau ◽  
...  

Background: The provision of emergency and hospital care has become an integral part of the global vision for universal health coverage. It is recommended that at least 80% of a country s population should be within two hours of a facility with essential surgery and anesthetic services. In order to strengthen health systems to achieve this goal, there needs to be an understanding of the time necessary for populations to reach a hospital. The goal of this study was to develop methods that accurately estimate referral and pre-hospital time for rural health districts in LMICs. We used these estimates to assess how the local geography can limit the impact of a strengthened referral program in a rural district of Madagascar. Methods: We developed a database containing 1) travel speed in a subset of routes by foot and motorized vehicles in Ifanadiana District; 2) a full mapping of all roads, footpaths and households in the district; and 3) remotely sensed data on terrain, land cover and climatic characteristics. We used this information to calibrate estimates of referral and pre-hospital time based on shortest route algorithms and statistical models of local travel speed. We compared these estimates with those from other commonly used methods in geographic accessibility modeling. Finally, we studied the impact of referral time on the evolution of the number of referrals completed by each health center in the district in 2014-2020 via generalized linear mixed models, using model estimates to predict the impact on referral numbers of strategies aimed at reducing referral time for underserved populations. Results: About 10% of the population lived less than two hours from the hospital, and more than half lived over four hours away, with variable access depending on climatic conditions. Only the four health centers (out of 21) located near the paved road had referral times to the hospital within one hour, which contributed over 75% of all 8,464 hospital referrals. Referral time remained the main barrier limiting the number of referrals despite health system strengthening efforts. The addition of two new referral centers is estimated to triple the population living within two hours from a center with higher acute care capacity and nearly double the number of referrals expected. Conclusion: This study demonstrates how adapting geographic accessibility modeling methods to local scales can occur through improving the precision of travel time estimates and pairing them with data on health facility data. Such information can substantially improve the design of a local health system to overcome existing barriers to care and achieve universal health coverage.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olushayo Olu ◽  
Pamela Drameh-Avognon ◽  
Emil Asamoah-Odei ◽  
Francis Kasolo ◽  
Tomas Valdez ◽  
...  

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported the following author name error is the article:


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salman Barasteh ◽  
Maryam Rassouli ◽  
Mohammad Reza Karimirad ◽  
Abbas Ebadi

Purpose: Nursing development is considered as one of the most important ways to achieve the universal health coverage and sustainable development goals in different countries. Nursing in Iran has the potential to provide services at all levels of universal health coverage. Therefore, planning for nursing in Iran needs to recognize the future challenges. This study aims to explore the future challenges of nursing in the health system of Iran from the perspective of nursing experts.Methods: In this qualitative study, 11 semi-structured interviews were conducted with nursing experts by purposive sampling in 2017–2018. Interviews were recorded and transcribed and framework analysis method was used to analysis the data.Results: The results showed that a favorable future requires planning in three areas of nursing “governance challenges” including centralized nursing stewardship, policy-making and legislation, monitoring and evaluation, and cooperation and communication with other institutions, “inadequacy of professional development with social demands” including community-based nursing, nursing upgrades with disease patterns, expanding home care, expanding care centers, and use of technology, “human resource challenges “including nursing education tailored to the needs of the community, empowering nursing managers, recruiting and retaining nurses, and specialized nursing.Conclusions: A favorable future requires a coherent nursing government, professional development of nursing based on social demands, and enhancing human resources in line with the emerging needs of the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document