scholarly journals University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) in-house COVID-19 testing program

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy Rudewick ◽  
Taylor Gunby ◽  
Anajane G. Smith ◽  
Zibiao Guo ◽  
Angela J. Middleton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Student Athletes ◽  
National Collegiate Athletic Association ◽  
Rapid Identification ◽  
Athletic Programs ◽  
Athletic Program ◽  
Testing Program ◽  
University Of Texas ◽  
Safe Environment ◽  
Mandated Testing ◽  
The University

AbstractThe pandemic caused by the spread of the virus SARS-CoV-2 threatened to severely disrupt the activities of student-athletes. (REF) In order to provide a safe environment for athletic competition, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) mandated testing of student-athletes. The goal was to rapidly identify student-athletes and the athletic staff member who either tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 or were in contact with individuals who tested positive. Rapid identification of infected individuals and their contacts allowed the University to implement quarantine standards and quarantine facilities quickly as needed. The University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) developed an in-house testing program and was quickly able to meet the NCAA requirements, allowing UTA to continue its athletic participation with minimal forfeiture of scheduled games. The purpose of this paper is to report the implementation UTA’s COVID prevention program for the university’s athletic program. This program will provide valuable information to other universities’ planning for the management of COVID prevention in their athletic programs. Challenges and solutions are identified.

scholarly journals Being Social: Why the NCAA Has Forced Universities to Monitor Student-Athletes' Social Media

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie P. Hopkins ◽  
Katie Hopkins ◽  
Bijan Whelton
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Student Athletes ◽  
National Collegiate Athletic Association ◽  
Public Image ◽  
Legal Rights ◽  
Privacy Laws ◽  
Social Media Monitoring ◽  
Media Monitoring ◽  
Free Speech Rights ◽  
The University

On June 21, 2011, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) charged the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) with a number of NCAA legislation violations, including “not adequately and consistently monitor[ing] social networking activity that visibly illustrated potential amateurism violations within the football program[.]” While the NCAA’s bylaws regarding member institution conduct indirectly impacts social media oversight, the NCAA’s lack of a social media monitoring policy creates uncertainty as to how member institutions should deal with potential violations of a non-existing policy. Coupled with concerns about their public image, tort liability, and their student-athletes’ safety, NCAA member institutions must develop a social media monitoring policy that does not infringe on constitutional free speech rights or more specific social media privacy laws. Ultimately, monitoring publicly available social media might be the safest and the best way to protect the institutions’ interests without violating their student-athletes’ legal rights.

Not a “Nonissue”: Perceptions and Realities of Campus Carry at The University of Texas at Austin

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
SAMPO RUOPPILA ◽  
ALBION M. BUTTERS
Keyword(s):  
Publicly Funded ◽  
Campus Life ◽  
University Of Texas ◽  
The Law ◽  
The University

As a publicly funded institution,The University of Texas at Austin had to implement the state's legislation to allow concealed handguns on campus. Yet its own Campus Carry policy has sought to erase the matter from everyday campus life. The administration deems it a “nonissue,” presuming that students have become accustomed to the idea, do not think about it actively, and have a low interest in acquiring a handgun license. This paper, based on a survey of the university's undergraduates, questions these ideas. It shows that a majority of students think that the issue is important and examines in what sense the students are troubled by its effects. While opinions differ between supporters and opponents of Campus Carry, divergences also exist within their ranks, such as among supporters of the law regarding where guns should specifically be allowed at the university. On the basis of the survey, the essay also examines how many licensed carriers are actually on campus, compared to the university's estimates.

scholarly journals 44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S45-S45
Author(s):  
Joseph Patrik Hornak ◽  
David Reynoso
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
Resistance Development ◽  
Texas Medical ◽  
University Of Texas ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Mrsa Infection ◽  
The University ◽  
Alternative Antibiotic

Abstract Background Reported β-lactam allergy (BLA) is very common, yet less than 10% of these patients exhibit true hypersensitivity. When faced with reported BLAs, physicians often choose alternative antibiotics which can be associated with C. difficile infection, drug-resistance development, poorer outcomes, & increased costs. Effective identification of these patients is necessary for subsequent, appropriate BLA “de-labeling.” Here, we conducted a single-center analysis of alternative antibiotic utilization amongst patients reporting BLA and compare the frequency of drug-resistant infections and C. difficile infection in allergic & non-allergic patients. Methods This is a retrospective review of adult patients hospitalized at The University of Texas Medical Branch from 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2019. Pooled electronic medical records were filtered by antibiotic orders and reported allergies to penicillins or cephalosporins. Patients with drug-resistant and/or C. difficile infection (CDI) were identified by ICD-10 codes. Microsoft Excel & MedCalc were used for statistical calculations. Results Data were available for 118,326 patients and 9.3% (11,982) reported a BLA, with the highest rates seen in those receiving aztreonam (85.9%, 530/617) & clindamycin (33.7%, 3949/11718). Amongst patients reporting BLA, high ratios-of-consumption (relative to all patients receiving antibiotics) were seen with aztreonam (7.0), clindamycin (2.7), cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitors (2.4), & daptomycin (2.1). Compared to the non-BLA population, BLA patients more frequently experienced MRSA infection (3.0% vs 1.5%, OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.79–2.23, p< 0.0001), β-lactam resistance (1.2% vs 0.6%, OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.72–2.49, p< 0.0001), and CDI (1.2% vs 0.7%, OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.54–2.23, p< 0.0001). Conclusion Our measured BLA rate matches approximate expectations near 10%. Moreover, these patients experienced significantly higher frequencies of drug-resistant bacterial infections and CDI. Targeted inpatient penicillin allergy testing stands to be particularly effective in those patients receiving disproportionately utilized alternative agents (e.g. aztreonam, clindamycin, daptomycin). β-lactam allergy “de-labeling” in these patients is likely a valuable antimicrobial stewardship target. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document