scholarly journals MinION nanopore sequencing provides similar methylation estimates to Sanger bisulfite sequencing in the TRPA1 promoter region

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Gombert ◽  
Kirsten Jahn ◽  
Hansi Pathak ◽  
Alexandra Burkert ◽  
Gunnar Schmidt ◽  
...  

Bisulfite sequencing has long been considered the gold standard for measurement of DNA methylation at single CpG resolution. In the meantime, several new approaches have been developed, which are regarded as less error-prone. Since these errors were shown to be sequence-specific, we aimed to verify the methylation data of a particular region of the TRPA1 promoter obtained from our previous studies. For this purpose, we compared methylation rates obtained via direct bisulfite sequencing and nanopore sequencing. Thus, we were able to confirm our previous findings to a large extent.

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (22) ◽  
pp. 4586-4595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Ni ◽  
Neng Huang ◽  
Zhi Zhang ◽  
De-Peng Wang ◽  
Fan Liang ◽  
...  

Abstract Motivation The Oxford Nanopore sequencing enables to directly detect methylation states of bases in DNA from reads without extra laboratory techniques. Novel computational methods are required to improve the accuracy and robustness of DNA methylation state prediction using Nanopore reads. Results In this study, we develop DeepSignal, a deep learning method to detect DNA methylation states from Nanopore sequencing reads. Testing on Nanopore reads of Homo sapiens (H. sapiens), Escherichia coli (E. coli) and pUC19 shows that DeepSignal can achieve higher performance at both read level and genome level on detecting 6 mA and 5mC methylation states comparing to previous hidden Markov model (HMM) based methods. DeepSignal achieves similar performance cross different DNA methylation bases, different DNA methylation motifs and both singleton and mixed DNA CpG. Moreover, DeepSignal requires much lower coverage than those required by HMM and statistics based methods. DeepSignal can achieve 90% above accuracy for detecting 5mC and 6 mA using only 2× coverage of reads. Furthermore, for DNA CpG methylation state prediction, DeepSignal achieves 90% correlation with bisulfite sequencing using just 20× coverage of reads, which is much better than HMM based methods. Especially, DeepSignal can predict methylation states of 5% more DNA CpGs that previously cannot be predicted by bisulfite sequencing. DeepSignal can be a robust and accurate method for detecting methylation states of DNA bases. Availability and implementation DeepSignal is publicly available at https://github.com/bioinfomaticsCSU/deepsignal. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at bioinformatics online.


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 737-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Merkel ◽  
Marcos Fernández-Callejo ◽  
Eloi Casals ◽  
Santiago Marco-Sola ◽  
Ronald Schuyler ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Merkel ◽  
Marcos Fernández-Callejo ◽  
Eloi Casals ◽  
Santiago Marco-Sola ◽  
Ronald Schuyler ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Ni ◽  
Neng Huang ◽  
Feng Luo ◽  
Jianxin Wang

AbstractThe Oxford Nanopore sequencing enables to directly detect methylation sites in DNA from reads without extra laboratory techniques. In this study, we develop DeepSignal, a deep learning method to detect DNA methylated sites from Nanopore sequencing reads. DeepSignal construct features from both raw electrical signals and signal sequences in Nanopore reads. Testing on Nanopore reads of pUC19, E. coli and human, we show that DeepSignal can achieve both higher read level and genome level accuracy on detecting 6mA and 5mC methylation comparing to previous HMM based methods. Moreover, DeepSignal achieves similar performance cross different methylation bases and different methylation motifs. Furthermore, DeepSignal can detect 5mC and 6mA methylation states of genome sites with above 90% genome level accuracy under just 5X coverage using controlled methylation data.


2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (21) ◽  
pp. 4067-4068 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Bock ◽  
S. Reither ◽  
T. Mikeska ◽  
M. Paulsen ◽  
J. Walter ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2604-2604
Author(s):  
Jerry Fong ◽  
John R. Edwards ◽  
Jacob R. Gardner ◽  
Amanda F Cashen ◽  
Kilian Q. Weinberger ◽  
...  

Abstract DNA methylation has been functionally implicated in X-inactivation, genomic imprinting, and silencing of transposable elements. DNA methylation also has a complex regulatory relationship with gene expression. Canonically, methylation around the promoters of tumor-suppressor genes induces gene-silencing, thereby representing a hit in the two-hit hypothesis for the development of cancer. Unfortunately, profiling studies conducted to determine how aberrant methylation may contribute to cancer progression are confounded by heterogeneity in the original clinical sample. Thus, though studies in patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) have found that variation in detected methylation values from patients at diagnosis correlates with prognosis following therapy, they do not address which subclonal methylation events contribute to cancer progression. To address this concern, we developed a novel computational method to deconvolve the bisulfite sequencing data from a sample into its major methylation profiles and their respective prevalence in the sample. Our method, based on a modified Hidden Markov Model, effectively models the autocorrelations found in methylation data and outperforms existing algorithms. Our method was validated across a wide range of mixture simulations, where bisulfite sequencing reads from various different cell types were subsampled to form test samples that could be deconvolved. We were able to accurately (98%) distinguish distinct methylation patterns corresponding to the expected underlying subpopulations, such as for CD14 and CD22 in mixtures of germinal center B-cells and monocytes and for CD4 and CD8A in mixtures of CD4+ T-lymphocytes and CD8+ T-lymphocytes. These patterns also recapitulated differentially methylated regions (DMRs) identified by an independent DMR-caller. Given that our method does not rely on cell-type specific parameters and is therefore robust to all samples, to further validate and demonstrate the applicability of our method, we conducted Agilent Methyl-Seq on 5 primary DLBCL samples procured by the Lymphoma Core at the Siteman Cancer Center. As a positive control, our method identified differential methylation profiles at loci expected to differ from underlying CD19+ and CD4+ cells, which comprise a large majority of each sample. Our method also identified distinct methylation profiles not found in reference profiles from normal cell-types, suggesting these methylation profiles may be specific to DLBCL. To further validate these findings, we used single-cell bisulfite-sequencing at ten loci to demonstrate that the methylation profiles predicted by our method from the original sample are found in individual cells. We found several methylation patterns that only existed in a subset of CD19+ cells, which may represent distinct epigenetic subclones of DLBCL. Using our novel computational method, we next profiled the subclonal epigenetic architecture of publicly available (dbGaP) paired samples from patients with AML (n=137) at diagnosis and following therapy. We were able to not only identify subclonal methylation profiles that were specific to cancer but also find profiles at higher prevalence in patients at relapse compared to diagnosis. These methylation profiles, which were enriched for genes in cancer pathways as seen by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis, may confer fitness advantages for a cancer subclone to expand. We are currently conducting additional analyses to characterize the epigenetic regulatory circuits that contribute to our observed increase in subclonal fitness. In summary, we have developed a robust method to identify subclonal methylation changes that may contribute to cancer progression and prognosis, as seen in AML, and may lead to new avenues for improving treatment for patients with leukemia or lymphoma. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 639-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quentin Gouil ◽  
Andrew Keniry

Abstract Bisulfite sequencing is a powerful technique to detect 5-methylcytosine in DNA that has immensely contributed to our understanding of epigenetic regulation in plants and animals. Meanwhile, research on other base modifications, including 6-methyladenine and 4-methylcytosine that are frequent in prokaryotes, has been impeded by the lack of a comparable technique. Bisulfite sequencing also suffers from a number of drawbacks that are difficult to surmount, among which DNA degradation, lack of specificity, or short reads with low sequence diversity. In this review, we explore the recent refinements to bisulfite sequencing protocols that enable targeting genomic regions of interest, detecting derivatives of 5-methylcytosine, and mapping single-cell methylomes. We then present the unique advantage of long-read sequencing in detecting base modifications in native DNA and highlight the respective strengths and weaknesses of PacBio and Nanopore sequencing for this application. Although analysing epigenetic data from long-read platforms remains challenging, the ability to detect various modified bases from a universal sample preparation, in addition to the mapping and phasing advantages of the longer read lengths, provide long-read sequencing with a decisive edge over short-read bisulfite sequencing for an expanding number of applications across kingdoms.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 608-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Spencer ◽  
Bilal Al-Khalil ◽  
David Russler-Germain ◽  
Tamara Lamprecht ◽  
Nicole Havey ◽  
...  

Abstract Mutations in the de novo DNA methyltransferase DNMT3A are found in ~25% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and most commonly affect codon 882 within the catalytic domain of the protein. We have previously shown that this mutation has dominant negative activity in vitro and is associated with hypomethylation at specific CpG dinucleotides in primary AML samples using array-based methylation data. However, the genome-wide extent and patterns of DNA methylation associated with this hypomethylation are currently unknown. In addition, it is unclear if the methylation differences caused by this mutation result in RNA expression changes at specific targets across the genome, or whether they are associated with altered chromatin structure. To explore the genome-wide consequences of the DNMT3A R882H mutation on DNA methylation and chromatin structure, we carried out whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) and transposase-mediated chromatin accessibility profiling (ATAC-seq) on 3 primary normal karyotype AML samples with the DNMT3A R882H mutation and 4 matched AML samples without a DNMT3A mutation. All 7 had the NPMc mutation but lacked mutations in other genes involved in DNA methylation, including IDH1, IDH2, and TET2. WGBS produced methylation data on >93% of the CpGs in the human reference sequence with a median coverage of 7-13x. The overall mean methylation was not statistically different in the samples with R882H mutations, although there was a small but statistically significant difference in the methylation at CpGs in CpG islands (DNMT3A R882H mean: 18.1%, DNMT3A wild-type mean: 21.4%; P=0.02). Differential methylation analysis was performed on ~5 million CpG clusters (median of 5 CpGs per cluster; median cluster size of 202 bp) and identified 95,845 differentially methylated clusters with a mean difference >25% and a q-value < 0.01, the majority of which (88,512; 93%) were hypomethylated in the DNMT3A R882H samples. Using more strict criteria (>50% mean difference) and merging differentially methylated clusters within 50 bp, we identified 2,782 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) with a mean size of 255 bp (median of 11 CpGs), of which 97% were hypomethylated. These DMRs were distributed across the genome and were statistically associated with CpG dense regions, including annotated CpG islands and shores (islands: 1,104 of 2,782; 29.9%; shores: 1,118 of 2,782; 30.3%; P<10-10), and gene promoters (816 of 2,782; 23.7%; P< 10-12). Analysis of chromatin accessibility data from 6 samples (3 DNMT3A R882H and 3 DNMT3A wild-type) showed that a subset of the DNMT3A R882H-associated hypomethylated DMRs (366 of 2,704; 13.5%) were located within 100 bp of an ATAC-seq peak unique to DNMT3A R882H AML samples. Further analysis of all DMRs showed ATAC-seq signal enrichment in the R882H samples specifically at hypomethylated loci (Figure 1). Similar enrichment was not observed in the DNMT3A wild-type AMLs at hypomethylated DMRs (N=78), suggesting that hypomethylation caused by the DNMT3A R882H mutation is specifically associated with changes in chromatin structure. Initial analysis of existing PolyA+ RNA-seq data for these AMLs did not reveal canonical expression changes in annotated genes located near the DMRs, implying that methylation and other epigenetic changes might affect distant genes or previously unannotated RNA species that were not present in our dataset. Efforts to sequence all RNA species present in these samples are therefore underway. In summary, we have conducted an initial analysis of genome-wide, CpG-resolution DNA methylation data from primary AML samples with the DNMT3A R882H mutation. This mutation is associated with a genome-wide, focal hypomethylation phenotype that occurs at small, CpG-dense loci across the genome. We also found that many hypomethylated loci are associated with changes in chromatin structure. These findings represent the first evidence that the methylation changes caused by this mutation can have functional consequences on the epigenetic state of specific loci in AML cells, and set the stage for defining the specific events that are responsible for AML pathogenesis in patients who have this mutation. Figure 1 WGBS (bottom tracks) and chromatin accessibility (ATAC-seq, top tracks) from 3 primary AML samples with the DNMT3A R882H mutation (in red) and 3 with no DNMT3A mutation (in blue) at a hypomethylated locus within the HS3ST3B1 gene. Figure 1. WGBS (bottom tracks) and chromatin accessibility (ATAC-seq, top tracks) from 3 primary AML samples with the DNMT3A R882H mutation (in red) and 3 with no DNMT3A mutation (in blue) at a hypomethylated locus within the HS3ST3B1 gene. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document