scholarly journals LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION (EUS-RFA) FOR ADVANCED PANCREATIC AND PERIAMPULLARY ADENOCARCINOMA

Author(s):  
Nirav Thosani ◽  
Putao Cen ◽  
Julie Rowe ◽  
Sushovan Guha ◽  
Jennifer M Bailey ◽  
...  

Background: Long term prognosis for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains especially poor with an overall 5-year survival rate less than 9%. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided RFA (EUS-RFA) is an emerging technology and limited data exist regarding long-term outcomes of EUS-RFA for PDAC. In addition to thermal-induced coagulative necrosis and tissue damage, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has potential to stimulate the host antitumor immunity. The aim of this study is to report long-term outcomes of EUS-RFA for unresectable PDAC. Methods: Retrospective chart review of adult patients with an established diagnosis of locally-advanced or metastatic PDAC undergoing EUS-RFA between October 2016 to March 2018 with long term follow up (>30 months). Patients included in the review underwent a total of 1-4 RFA sessions using the Habib EUS-RFA radiofrequency catheter. All patients were concurrently undergoing standard of care chemotherapy. Results: 10 patients (median age 62 years, male 70%) underwent EUS-RFA (Table 1). Location of the primary PDAC was in the head (4), neck (2), body (2), and tail (2). A total of 22 RFA sessions were performed with a range of 1-4 RFA sessions per patient. RFA was technically successful in all RFA sessions (100%). There were no major adverse events (bleeding, perforation, infection, pancreatitis) in immediate (up to 72 hours) and short-term follow up (4 week). Mild worsening of existing abdominal pain was noted during post-procedure observation in 12/22 (55%) of RFA treatments. Follow-up imaging after RFA treatment was available in 8/10 patients. Tumor progression was noted in 2 patients, whereas tumor regression was noted in 6 patients (>50% reduction in size in 3 patients). Median survival for the cohort was 20.5 months (95% CI, 9.93 to 42.2 months). Currently, 2 patients remain alive at 53 and 73 months follow-up since initial diagnosis. One patient had 3 cm PDAC with encasement of the portal confluence, abutment of the celiac axis, common hepatic and superior mesenteric artery. This patient had significant reduction in tumor size and underwent standard pancreaticoduodenectomy. Conclusion: In our experience, EUS-RFA was safe, well-tolerated and could be concurrently performed with standard of care chemotherapy. In this select cohort, median survival (20.5 months) was improved when compared to published survival based upon SEER database and clinical trials. Future prospective trials are needed to understand the role of EUS-RFA in overall management of PDAC.

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Tanaka ◽  
Seiichiro Sugimoto ◽  
Junichi Soh ◽  
Takahiro Oto

Abstract The technique of pneumonectomy, back-table lung preservation, double-sleeve resection and reimplantation of basal segments (the Oto procedure) has been proposed as a useful technique for the management of locally advanced central lung cancer with short-term follow-up. We report the long-term outcomes of 5 consecutive patients who underwent the Oto procedure.


Hand ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 155894471990131
Author(s):  
Erin F. Ransom ◽  
Heather L. Minton ◽  
Bradley L. Young ◽  
Jun Kit He ◽  
Brent A. Ponce ◽  
...  

Background: Although the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is often missed, outcomes from surgical intervention significantly improve patient satisfaction. This article seeks to highlight patient characteristics, intraoperative findings, and both short and long-term outcomes of thoracic outlet decompression in the adolescent population. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients between the ages of 13 and 21 years with a clinical diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) who were treated surgically between 2000 and 2015 was performed. Data points including preoperative patient characteristics and intraoperative findings were collected. In addition, patient-reported outcome scores, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, Cervical Brachial Symptom Questionnaire (CBSQ), and NTOS index, were obtained for a cohort of patients with follow-up ranging from 2 to 15 years. Results: The study population consisted of 54 patients involving 61 extremities. The most common procedures included neurolysis of the supraclavicular brachial plexus (60, 98.4%), anterior scalenectomy (59, 96.7%), and middle scalenectomy (54, 88.5%). First rib resection (FRR) was performed in 28 patients (45.9%). Long-term outcomes were collected for 24 (44%) of 54 patients with an average follow-up of 69.5 months (range, 24-180 months). The average VAS improved from 7.5 preoperatively to 1.8 postoperatively. The average SANE increased from 28.9 preoperatively to 85.4 postoperatively. The average postoperative scores were 11.4 for the QuickDASH, 27.4 for the CBSQ, and 17.2 for the NTOS index. Subgroup analysis of patients having FRR (28, 45.9%) demonstrated no difference in clinical outcome measures compared with patients who did not have FRR. Conclusion: Surgical treatment of NTOS in adolescent patients has favorable intermediate and long-term outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15598-e15598
Author(s):  
Lucia Ceniceros ◽  
Carlos Pastor ◽  
Carlos Sanchez-Justicia ◽  
Carolina Arean ◽  
Jorge Baixauli ◽  
...  

e15598 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an emerging alternative in the management of patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer (LACRC), with promising results in terms of R0 resection rates, compliance, postoperative morbidity and a trend towards reduced risk of relapse. However, more mature data are required. We evaluated the long-term outcome of this strategy in our institution. Methods: We retrospectively analysed LACRC patients treated preoperatively with either biweekly FOLFOX or XELOX at standard doses as a follow-up of our previous experience with this neoadjuvant approach. Patients were identified from a prospectively collected tumor registry database from our institution. Clinical staging was based on colonoscopy and CT-scan. Only patients with radiological signs of lymph node involvement and/or extramural invasion > 5 mm were included. The uracil/dihidrouracil ratio was calculated at baseline as a surrogate marker of DPD deficiency. Pathological tumor regression was graded according to the MSKCC and toxicity with the NCI-CTCAE 4.0. Results: From February 2006 to November 2019 91 pts with MSS LACRC (M/F: 62/29; median age 66. Clinical stage; T3: 60.4%, T4: 37.4%, N+: 75.8%; Sideness: 82.4% left located were analysed. Preoperative chemo was FOLFOX in 46 pts and CAPOX in 45 pts. Median number of preoperative cycles was 4 (range 1-10). Side effects profile included G3-4 diarrhea (3.3%), G2 sensitive neuropathy (12.1%) and G2 neutropenia (4.4%). 9 pts had a treatment delay due to haematological toxicity. No progressive disease was noted during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients underwent surgery, most of them (63.7%) by a laparoscopic approach. pCR was found in 11 pts (12.1%). Grade 3, 3+ and 4 tumor regression according to MSKCC score was reached in 50.5% of the patients (Median number of harvested nodes was 17 (range 7-51), with 75.8% being ypN0. Lymphovascular and perineural invasion were found in 7.7% and 6.6% of the patients, respectively. The median hospital stay was 7 days (3-36) and 13 pts develop any surgical complication. 37.4% received adjuvant treatment. After a median follow-up of 63 months, median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have not been reached. 5-year actuarial PFS for right and left LACRC was 77 and 87%, respectively. Conclusions: Our data add to the growing evidence suggesting that NAC may play a meaningful role in LACRC patients


Gut ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2020-322615
Author(s):  
Sanne van Munster ◽  
Esther Nieuwenhuis ◽  
Bas L A M Weusten ◽  
Lorenza Alvarez Herrero ◽  
Auke Bogte ◽  
...  

ObjectiveRadiofrequency ablation (RFA)±endoscopic resection (ER) is the preferred treatment for early neoplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus (BE). We aimed to report short-term and long-term outcomes for all 1384 patients treated in the Netherlands (NL) from 2008 to 2018, with uniform treatment and follow-up (FU) in a centralised setting.DesignEndoscopic therapy for early BE neoplasia in NL is centralised in nine expert centres with specifically trained endoscopists and pathologists that adhere to a joint protocol. Prospectively collected data are registered in a uniform database. Patients with low/high-grade dysplasia or low-risk cancer, were treated by ER of visible lesions followed by trimonthly RFA sessions of any residual BE until complete eradication of BE (CE-BE). Patients with ER alone were not included.ResultsAfter ER (62% of cases; 43% low-risk cancers) and median 1 circumferential and 2 focal RFA (p25-p75 0–1; 1–2) per patient, CE-BE was achieved in 94% (1270/1348). Adverse events occurred in 21% (268/1386), most commonly oesophageal stenosis (15%), all were managed endoscopically. A total of 1154 patients with CE-BE were analysed for long-term outcomes. During median 43 months (22–69) and 4 endoscopies (1–5), 38 patients developed dysplastic recurrence (3%, annual recurrence risk 1%), all were detected as endoscopically visible abnormalities. Random biopsies from a normal appearing cardia showed intestinal metaplasia (IM) in 14% and neoplasia in 0%. A finding of IM in the cardia was reproduced during further FU in only 33%, none progressed to neoplasia. Frequent FU visits in the first year of FU were not associated with recurrence risk.ConclusionIn a setting of centralised care, RFA±ER is effective for eradication of Barrett’s related neoplasia and has remarkably low rates of dysplastic recurrence. Our data support more lenient FU intervals, with emphasis on careful endoscopic inspection. Random biopsies from neosquamous epithelium and cardia are of questionable value.Netherlands trial register numberNL7039.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document