Considering variance in pollinator responses to stressors can reveal potential for resilience

Environmental stressors have sublethal consequences on animals, often affecting the mean of phenotypic traits in a population. However, potential effects on variance are poorly understood. Since phenotypic variance is the basis for adaptation, any influence of stressors may have important implications for population resilience. Here we explored this possibility in insect pollinators by analysing raw datasets from 24 studies (6,913 bees) in which individuals were first exposed to stressors and then tested for cognitive tasks. While all types of stressors decreased the mean cognitive performance of bees, their effect on variance was complex. Focusing on 15 pesticide studies, we found that the dose and the mode of exposure to stressors were critical. At low pesticide doses, cognitive variance decreased following chronic exposures but not for acute exposures. Acute exposure to low doses thus seems less damaging at the population level. In all cases however, the variance decreased with increasing doses. Policy implications: Current guidelines for the authorization of plant protection products on the European market prioritize acute over chronic toxicity assessments on non-target organisms. By overlooking the consequences of a chronic exposure, regulatory authorities may register new products that are harmful to bee populations. Our findings thus call for more research on stress-induced phenotypic variance and its incorporation to policy guidelines to help identify levels and modes of exposure animals can cope with.