scholarly journals Impact of Ghost Introgression on Coalescent-based Species Tree Inference and Estimation of Divergence Time

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
XiaoXu Pang ◽  
Da-Yong Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Divergence Time ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Multispecies Coalescent ◽  
Tree Inference ◽  
Tree Methods ◽  
The Impact

The species studied in any evolutionary investigation generally constitute a very small proportion of all the species currently existing or that have gone extinct. It is therefore likely that introgression, which is widespread across the tree of life, involves "ghosts," i.e., unsampled, unknown, or extinct lineages. However, the impact of ghost introgression on estimations of species trees has been rarely studied and is thus poorly understood. In this study, we use mathematical analysis and simulations to examine the robustness of species tree methods based on a multispecies coalescent model under gene flow sourcing from an extant or ghost lineage. We found that very low levels of extant or ghost introgression can result in anomalous gene trees (AGTs) on three-taxon rooted trees if accompanied by strong incomplete lineage sorting (ILS). In contrast, even massive introgression, with more than half of the recipient genome descending from the donor lineage, may not necessarily lead to AGTs. In cases involving an ingroup lineage (defined as one that diverged no earlier than the most basal species under investigation) acting as the donor of introgression, the time of root divergence among the investigated species was either underestimated or remained unaffected, but for the cases of outgroup ghost lineages acting as donors, the divergence time was generally overestimated. Under many conditions of ingroup introgression, the stronger the ILS was, the higher was the accuracy of estimating the time of root divergence, although the topology of the species tree is more prone to be biased by the effect of introgression.

scholarly journals Analyzing contentious relationships and outlier genes in phylogenomics

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph F. Walker ◽  
Joseph W. Brown ◽  
Stephen A. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Tree Inference ◽  
Small Set ◽  
Tree Methods ◽  
Edge Based ◽  
Species Tree Inference

ABSTRACTRecent studies have demonstrated that conflict is common among gene trees in phylogenomic studies, and that less than one percent of genes may ultimately drive species tree inference in supermatrix analyses. Here, we examined two datasets where supermatrix and coalescent-based species trees conflict. We identified two highly influential “outlier” genes in each dataset. When removed from each dataset, the inferred supermatrix trees matched the topologies obtained from coalescent analyses. We also demonstrate that, while the outlier genes in the vertebrate dataset have been shown in a previous study to be the result of errors in orthology detection, the outlier genes from a plant dataset did not exhibit any obvious systematic error and therefore may be the result of some biological process yet to be determined. While topological comparisons among a small set of alternate topologies can be helpful in discovering outlier genes, they can be limited in several ways, such as assuming all genes share the same topology. Coalescent species tree methods relax this assumption but do not explicitly facilitate the examination of specific edges. Coalescent methods often also assume that conflict is the result of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS). Here we explored a framework that allows for quickly examining alternative edges and support for large phylogenomic datasets that does not assume a single topology for all genes. For both datasets, these analyses provided detailed results confirming the support for coalescent-based topologies. This framework suggests that we can improve our understanding of the underlying signal in phylogenomic datasets by asking more targeted edge-based questions.

scholarly journals MSCquartets 1.0: Quartet methods for species trees and networks under the multispecies coalescent model in R

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A Rhodes ◽  
Hector Baños ◽  
Jonathan D Mitchell ◽  
Elizabeth S Allman
Keyword(s):  
Network Inference ◽  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
R Package ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Coalescent Model ◽  
Multispecies Coalescent ◽  
Tree Inference

Abstract Summary MSCquartets is an R package for species tree hypothesis testing, inference of species trees, and inference of species networks under the Multispecies Coalescent model of incomplete lineage sorting and its network analog. Input for these analyses are collections of metric or topological locus trees which are then summarized by the quartets displayed on them. Results of hypothesis tests at user-supplied levels are displayed in a simplex plot by color-coded points. The package implements the QDC and WQDC algorithms for topological and metric species tree inference, and the NANUQ algorithm for level-1 topological species network inference, all of which give statistically consistent estimators under the model. Availability MSCquartets is available through the Comprehensive R Archive Network: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MSCquartets. Supplementary information Supplementary materials, including example data and analyses, are incorporated into the package.

scholarly journals Terraces in Gene Tree Reconciliation-Based Species Tree Inference

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Sanderson ◽  
Michelle M. McMahon ◽  
Mike Steel
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Gene Tree ◽  
Solution Space ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Tree Reconciliation ◽  
The Impact

AbstractTerraces in phylogenetic tree space are sets of trees with identical optimality scores for a given data set, arising from missing data. These were first described for multilocus phylogenetic data sets in the context of maximum parsimony inference and maximum likelihood inference under certain model assumptions. Here we show how the mathematical properties that lead to terraces extend to gene tree - species tree problems in which the gene trees are incomplete. Inference of species trees from either sets of gene family trees subject to duplication and loss, or allele trees subject to incomplete lineage sorting, can exhibit terraces in their solution space. First, we show conditions that lead to a new kind of terrace, which stems from subtree operations that appear in reconciliation problems for incomplete trees. Then we characterize when terraces of both types can occur when the optimality criterion for tree search is based on duplication, loss or deep coalescence scores. Finally, we examine the impact of assumptions about the causes of losses: whether they are due to imperfect sampling or true evolutionary deletion.

scholarly journals Gene tree discord, simplex plots, and statistical tests under the coalescent

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth S. Allman ◽  
Jonathan D. Mitchell ◽  
John A. Rhodes
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Gene Tree ◽  
Complex Model ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Multispecies Coalescent ◽  
Tree Inference

AbstractA simple graphical device, the simplex plot of quartet concordance factors, is introduced to aid in the exploration of a collection of gene trees on a common set of taxa. A single plot summarizes all gene tree discord, and allows for visual comparison to the expected discord from the multispecies coalescent model (MSC) of incomplete lineage sorting on a species tree. A formal statistical procedure is described that can quantify the deviation from expectation for each subset of four taxa, suggesting when the data is not in accord with the MSC, and thus either gene tree inference error is substantial or a more complex model such as that on a network may be required. If the collection of gene trees appears to be in accord with the MSC, the plots may reveal when substantial incomplete lineage sorting is present and coalescent based species tree inference is preferred over concatenation approaches. Applications to both simulated and empirical multilocus data sets illustrate the insights provided.

scholarly journals Partitioned coalescence support reveals biases in species-tree methods and detects gene trees that determine phylogenomic conflicts

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Gatesy ◽  
Daniel B. Sloan ◽  
Jessica M. Warren ◽  
Richard H. Baker ◽  
Mark P. Simmons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Ratio Test ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Tree Methods ◽  
Permit Application ◽  
Tree Building ◽  
Genome Scale

AbstractGenomic datasets sometimes support unconventional or conflicting phylogenetic relationships when different tree-building methods are applied. Coherent interpretations of such results are enabled by partitioning support for controversial relationships among the constituent genes of a phylogenomic dataset. For the supermatrix (= concatenation) approach, several simple methods that measure the distribution of support and conflict among loci were introduced over 15 years ago. More recently, partitioned coalescence support (PCS) was developed for phylogenetic coalescence methods that account for incomplete lineage sorting and use the summed fits of gene trees to estimate the species tree. Here, we automate computation of PCS to permit application of this index to genome-scale matrices that include hundreds of loci. Reanalyses of four phylogenomic datasets for amniotes, land plants, skinks, and angiosperms demonstrate how PCS scores can be used to: 1) compare conflicting results favored by alternative coalescence methods, 2) identify outlier gene trees that have a disproportionate influence on the resolution of contentious relationships, 3) assess the effects of missing data in species-trees analysis, and 4) clarify biases in commonly-implemented coalescence methods and support indices. We show that key phylogenomic conclusions from these analyses often hinge on just a few gene trees and that results can be driven by specific biases of a particular coalescence method and/or the extreme weight placed on gene trees with high taxon sampling. Attributing exceptionally high weight to some gene trees and very low weight to other gene trees counters the basic logic of phylogenomic coalescence analysis; even clades in species trees with high support according to commonly used indices (likelihood-ratio test, bootstrap, Bayesian local posterior probability) can be unstable to the removal of only one or two gene trees with high PCS. Computer simulations cannot adequately describe all of the contingencies and complexities of empirical genetic data. PCS scores complement simulation work by providing specific insights into a particular dataset given the assumptions of the phylogenetic coalescence method that is applied. In combination with standard measures of nodal support, PCS provides a more complete understanding of the overall genomic evidence for contested evolutionary relationships in species trees.

scholarly journals MSCquartets 1.0: Quartet methods for species trees and networks under the multispecies coalescent model in R

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Rhodes ◽  
Hector Baños ◽  
Jonathan D. Mitchell ◽  
Elizabeth S. Allman
Keyword(s):  
Network Inference ◽  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
R Package ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Coalescent Model ◽  
Multispecies Coalescent ◽  
Tree Inference ◽  
Species Tree Inference

AbstractMSCquartets is an R package for species tree hypothesis testing, inference of species trees, and inference of species networks under the Multispecies Coalescent model of incomplete lineage sorting. Input for these analyses are collections of metric or topological locus trees which are then summarized by the quartets displayed on them. Results of hypothesis tests at user-supplied levels are displayed in a simplex plot by color-coded points. The package includes the QDC and WQDC algorithms for topological and metric species tree inference, and the NANUQ algorithm for level-1 topological species network inference, all of which give statistically consistent estimators under the model.

scholarly journals Statistical inconsistency of the unrooted minimize deep coalescence criterion

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0251107
Author(s):  
Ayed A. R. Alanzi ◽  
James H. Degnan
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Gene Tree ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Evolutionary Relationships ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Input Gene ◽  
Multispecies Coalescent ◽  
Deep Coalescence

Species trees, which describe the evolutionary relationships between species, are often inferred from gene trees, which describe the ancestral relationships between sequences sampled at different loci from the species of interest. A common approach to inferring species trees from gene trees is motivated by supposing that gene tree variation is due to incomplete lineage sorting, also known as deep coalescence. One of the earliest methods motivated by deep coalescence is to find the species tree that minimizes the number of deep coalescent events needed to explain discrepancies between the species tree and input gene trees. This minimize deep coalescence (MDC) criterion can be applied in both rooted and unrooted settings. where either rooted or unrooted gene trees can be used to infer a rooted species tree. Previous work has shown that MDC is statistically inconsistent in the rooted setting, meaning that under a probabilistic model for deep coalescence, the multispecies coalescent, for some species trees, increasing the number of input gene trees does not make the method more likely to return a correct species tree. Here, we obtain analogous results in the unrooted setting, showing conditions leading to inconsistency of the MDC criterion using the multispecies coalescent model with unrooted gene trees for four taxa and five taxa.

scholarly journals How to Tackle Phylogenetic Discordance in Recent and Rapidly Radiating Groups? Developing a Workflow Using Loricaria (Asteraceae) as an Example

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Kandziora ◽  
Petr Sklenář ◽  
Filip Kolář ◽  
Roswitha Schmickl
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Gene Tree ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Secondary Contact ◽  
Gene Trees ◽  
Species Trees ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Phylogenetic Discordance ◽  
Gene Tree Discordance ◽  
High Degree

A major challenge in phylogenetics and -genomics is to resolve young rapidly radiating groups. The fast succession of species increases the probability of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), and different topologies of the gene trees are expected, leading to gene tree discordance, i.e., not all gene trees represent the species tree. Phylogenetic discordance is common in phylogenomic datasets, and apart from ILS, additional sources include hybridization, whole-genome duplication, and methodological artifacts. Despite a high degree of gene tree discordance, species trees are often well supported and the sources of discordance are not further addressed in phylogenomic studies, which can eventually lead to incorrect phylogenetic hypotheses, especially in rapidly radiating groups. We chose the high-Andean Asteraceae genus Loricaria to shed light on the potential sources of phylogenetic discordance and generated a phylogenetic hypothesis. By accounting for paralogy during gene tree inference, we generated a species tree based on hundreds of nuclear loci, using Hyb-Seq, and a plastome phylogeny obtained from off-target reads during target enrichment. We observed a high degree of gene tree discordance, which we found implausible at first sight, because the genus did not show evidence of hybridization in previous studies. We used various phylogenomic analyses (trees and networks) as well as the D-statistics to test for ILS and hybridization, which we developed into a workflow on how to tackle phylogenetic discordance in recent radiations. We found strong evidence for ILS and hybridization within the genus Loricaria. Low genetic differentiation was evident between species located in different Andean cordilleras, which could be indicative of substantial introgression between populations, promoted during Pleistocene glaciations, when alpine habitats shifted creating opportunities for secondary contact and hybridization.

scholarly journals Species Tree Inference under the Multispecies Coalescent on Data with Paralogs is Accurate

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Yan ◽  
Peng Du ◽  
Matthew W. Hahn ◽  
Luay Nakhleh
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Single Copy ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Biological Data ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Multispecies Coalescent ◽  
Gene Copies ◽  
Tree Inference ◽  
Inference Methods ◽  
Species Tree Inference

AbstractThe multispecies coalescent (MSC) has emerged as a powerful and desirable framework for species tree inference in phylogenomic studies. Under this framework, the data for each locus is assumed to consist of orthologous, single-copy genes, and heterogeneity across loci is assumed to be due to incomplete lineage sorting (ILS). These assumptions have led biologists that use ILS-aware inference methods, whether based directly on the MSC or proven to be statistically consistent under it (collectively referred to here as MSC-based methods), to exclude all loci that are present in more than a single copy in any of the studied genomes. Furthermore, such analyses entail orthology assignment to avoid the potential of hidden paralogy in the data. The question we seek to answer in this study is: What happens if one runs such species tree inference methods on data where paralogy is present, in addition to or without ILS being present? Through simulation studies and analyses of two biological data sets, we show that running such methods on data with paralogs provide very accurate results, either by treating all gene copies within a family as alleles from multiple individuals or by randomly selecting one copy per species. Our results have significant implications for the use of MSC-based phylogenomic analyses, demonstrating that they do not have to be restricted to single-copy loci, thus greatly increasing the amount of data that can be used. [Multispecies coalescent; incomplete lineage sorting; gene duplication and loss; orthology; paralogy.]

scholarly journals Divergence estimation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting and migration

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Jones
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Lineage Sorting ◽  
Simulated Data ◽  
Species Tree ◽  
Lineage Sorting ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Migration Rates ◽  
Isolation With Migration ◽  
Multispecies Coalescent ◽  
Tree Inference ◽  
And Migration

AbstractThis paper focuses on the problem of estimating a species tree from multilocus data in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting and migration. We develop a mathematical model similar to IMa2 (Hey 2010) for the relevant evolutionary processes which allows both the the population size parameters and the migration rates between pairs of species tree branches to be integrated out. We then describe a BEAST2 package DENIM which based on this model, and which uses an approximation to sample from the posterior. The approximation is based on the assumption that migrations are rare, and it only samples from certain regions of the posterior which seem likely given this assumption. The method breaks down if there is a lot of migration. Using simulations, Leaché et al 2014 showed migration causes problems for species tree inference using the multispecies coalescent when migration is present but ignored. We re-analyze this simulated data to explore DENIM’s performance, and demonstrate substantial improvements over *BEAST. We also re-analyze an empirical data set. [isolation-with-migration; incomplete lineage sorting; multispecies coalescent; species tree; phylogenetic analysis; Bayesian; Markov chain Monte Carlo]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document