scholarly journals Multifunctional properties of Nej1XLF C-terminus promote end-joining and impact DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Mojumdar ◽  
Nancy Adam ◽  
Jennifer A Cobb
Keyword(s):  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
End Joining ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Canonical Pathways ◽  
Pathway Choice ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
End Resection

A DNA double strand break (DSB) is primarily repaired by one of two canonical pathways, non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). NHEJ requires no or minimal end processing for ligation, whereas HR requires 5 end resection followed by a search for homology. The main event that determines the mode of repair is the initiation of 5 resection because if resection starts, then NHEJ cannot occur. Nej1 is a canonical NHEJ factor that functions at the cross-roads of repair pathway choice and prior to its function in stimulating Dnl4 ligase. Nej1 competes with Dna2, inhibiting its recruitment to DSBs and thereby inhibiting resection. The highly conserved C-terminal region (CTR) of Nej1 (330- 338) is important for two events that drive NHEJ, stimulating ligation and inhibiting resection, but it is dispensable for end-bridging. By combining nej1 point mutants with nuclease-dead dna2-1, we find that Nej1-F335 is essential for end-joining whereas V338 promotes NHEJ indirectly through inhibiting Dna2-mediated resection.

Impact of chromatin context on Cas9-induced DNA double-strand break repair pathway balance

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruben Schep ◽  
Eva K. Brinkman ◽  
Christ Leemans ◽  
Xabier Vergara ◽  
Ben Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Editing ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
The Impact

AbstractDNA double-strand break (DSB) repair is mediated by multiple pathways, including classical non-homologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ) and several homology-driven repair pathways. This is particularly important for Cas9-mediated genome editing, where the outcome critically depends on the pathway that repairs the break. It is thought that the local chromatin context affects the pathway choice, but the underlying principles are poorly understood. Using a newly developed multiplexed reporter assay in combination with Cas9 cutting, we systematically measured the relative activities of three DSB repair pathways as function of chromatin context in >1,000 genomic locations. This revealed that NHEJ is broadly biased towards euchromatin, while microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) is more efficient in specific heterochromatin contexts. In H3K27me3-marked heterochromatin, inhibition of the H3K27 methyltransferase EZH2 shifts the balance towards NHEJ. Single-strand templated repair (SSTR), often used for precise CRISPR editing, competes with MMEJ, and this competition is weakly associated with chromatin context. These results provide insight into the impact of chromatin on DSB repair pathway balance, and guidance for the design of Cas9-mediated genome editing experiments.

scholarly journals Ku Regulates the Non-Homologous End Joining Pathway Choice of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair in Human Somatic Cells

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. e1000855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farjana Fattah ◽  
Eu Han Lee ◽  
Natalie Weisensel ◽  
Yongbao Wang ◽  
Natalie Lichter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatic Cells ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break Repair ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Pathway Choice ◽  
Break Repair ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

scholarly journals A histone H3K36 chromatin switch coordinates DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen-Chun Pai ◽  
Rachel S. Deegan ◽  
Lakxmi Subramanian ◽  
Csenge Gal ◽  
Sovan Sarkar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break Repair ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Pathway Choice ◽  
Break Repair

scholarly journals A role for the p53 tumour suppressor in regulating the balance between homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining

Open Biology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 160225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie Moureau ◽  
Janna Luessing ◽  
Emma Christina Harte ◽  
Muriel Voisin ◽  
Noel Francis Lowndes
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Tumour Suppressor ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Pathway Choice ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
End Resection

Loss of p53, a transcription factor activated by cellular stress, is a frequent event in cancer. The role of p53 in tumour suppression is largely attributed to cell fate decisions. Here, we provide evidence supporting a novel role for p53 in the regulation of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway choice. 53BP1, another tumour suppressor, was initially identified as p53 Binding Protein 1, and has been shown to inhibit DNA end resection, thereby stimulating non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Yet another tumour suppressor, BRCA1, reciprocally promotes end resection and homologous recombination (HR). Here, we show that in both human and mouse cells, the absence of p53 results in impaired 53BP1 focal recruitment to sites of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation. This effect is largely independent of cell cycle phase and the extent of DNA damage. In p53-deficient cells, diminished localization of 53BP1 is accompanied by a reciprocal increase in BRCA1 recruitment to DSBs. Consistent with these findings, we demonstrate that DSB repair via NHEJ is abrogated, while repair via homology-directed repair (HDR) is stimulated. Overall, we propose that in addition to its role as an ‘effector’ protein in the DNA damage response, p53 plays a role in the regulation of DSB repair pathway choice.

scholarly journals SHLD 2/ FAM 35A co‐operates with REV 7 to coordinate DNA double‐strand break repair pathway choice

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Findlay ◽  
John Heath ◽  
Vincent M Luo ◽  
Abba Malina ◽  
Théo Morin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break Repair ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Pathway Choice ◽  
Break Repair

scholarly journals Role of 53BP1 in the Regulation of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathway Choice

2014 ◽  
Vol 181 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arun Gupta ◽  
Clayton R. Hunt ◽  
Sharmistha Chakraborty ◽  
Raj K. Pandita ◽  
John Yordy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break Repair ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Pathway Choice ◽  
Break Repair

scholarly journals Nucleosome disassembly during human non-homologous end joining followed by concerted HIRA- and CAF-1-dependent reassembly

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan Li ◽  
Jessica K Tyler
Keyword(s):  
Strand Break ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Efficient Removal ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Nucleosome Disassembly ◽  
End Resection ◽  
Assembly Pathways

The cell achieves DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in the context of chromatin structure. However, the mechanisms used to expose DSBs to the repair machinery and to restore the chromatin organization after repair remain elusive. Here we show that induction of a DSB in human cells causes local nucleosome disassembly, apparently independently from DNA end resection. This efficient removal of histone H3 from the genome during non-homologous end joining was promoted by both ATM and the ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeler INO80. Chromatin reassembly during DSB repair was dependent on the HIRA histone chaperone that is specific to the replication-independent histone variant H3.3 and on CAF-1 that is specific to the replication-dependent canonical histones H3.1/H3.2. Our data suggest that the epigenetic information is re-established after DSB repair by the concerted and interdependent action of replication-independent and replication-dependent chromatin assembly pathways.

scholarly journals The deSUMOylase SENP2 coordinates homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining by independent mechanisms

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander J. Garvin ◽  
Alexandra K. Walker ◽  
Ruth M. Densham ◽  
Anoop Singh Chauhan ◽  
Helen R. Stone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractSUMOylation in the DNA double-strand break (DSB) response regulates recruitment, activity and clearance of repair factors. However, our understanding of a role for deSUMOylation in this process is limited. Here we identify different mechanistic roles for deSUMOylation in homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous enjoining (NHEJ) through the investigation of the deSUMOylase SENP2. We find regulated deSUMOylation of MDC1 prevents excessive SUMOylation and its RNF4-VCP mediated clearance from DSBs, thereby promoting NHEJ. In contrast we show HR is differentially sensitive to SUMO availability and SENP2 activity is needed to provide SUMO. SENP2 is amplified as part of the chromosome 3q amplification in many cancers. Increased SENP2 expression prolongs MDC1 foci retention and increases NHEJ and radioresistance. Collectively our data reveal that deSUMOylation differentially primes cells for responding to DSBs and demonstrates the ability of SENP2 to tune DSB repair responses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document