Impact of chromatin context on Cas9-induced DNA double-strand break repair pathway balance

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruben Schep ◽  
Eva K. Brinkman ◽  
Christ Leemans ◽  
Xabier Vergara ◽  
Ben Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Editing ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
The Impact

AbstractDNA double-strand break (DSB) repair is mediated by multiple pathways, including classical non-homologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ) and several homology-driven repair pathways. This is particularly important for Cas9-mediated genome editing, where the outcome critically depends on the pathway that repairs the break. It is thought that the local chromatin context affects the pathway choice, but the underlying principles are poorly understood. Using a newly developed multiplexed reporter assay in combination with Cas9 cutting, we systematically measured the relative activities of three DSB repair pathways as function of chromatin context in >1,000 genomic locations. This revealed that NHEJ is broadly biased towards euchromatin, while microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) is more efficient in specific heterochromatin contexts. In H3K27me3-marked heterochromatin, inhibition of the H3K27 methyltransferase EZH2 shifts the balance towards NHEJ. Single-strand templated repair (SSTR), often used for precise CRISPR editing, competes with MMEJ, and this competition is weakly associated with chromatin context. These results provide insight into the impact of chromatin on DSB repair pathway balance, and guidance for the design of Cas9-mediated genome editing experiments.

Targeting DNA Double-Strand Break (DSB) Repair to Counteract Tumor Radio-resistance

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 891-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yucui Zhao ◽  
Siyu Chen
Keyword(s):  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Dna Damages ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Made In

During the last decade, advances of radiotherapy (RT) have been made in the clinical practice of cancer treatment. RT exerts its anticancer effect mainly via leading to the DNA Double-Strand Break (DSB), which is one of the most toxic DNA damages. Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ) and Homologous Recombination (HR) are two major DSB repair pathways in human cells. It is known that dysregulations of DSB repair elicit a predisposition to cancer and probably result in resistance to cancer therapies including RT. Therefore, targeting the DSB repair presents an attractive strategy to counteract radio-resistance. In this review, we describe the latest knowledge of the two DSB repair pathways, focusing on several key proteins contributing to the repair, such as DNA-PKcs, RAD51, MRN and PARP1. Most importantly, we discuss the possibility of overcoming radiation resistance by targeting these proteins for therapeutic inhibition. Recent tests of DSB repair inhibitors in the laboratory and their translations into clinical studies are also addressed.

scholarly journals The deSUMOylase SENP2 coordinates homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining by independent mechanisms

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander J. Garvin ◽  
Alexandra K. Walker ◽  
Ruth M. Densham ◽  
Anoop Singh Chauhan ◽  
Helen R. Stone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractSUMOylation in the DNA double-strand break (DSB) response regulates recruitment, activity and clearance of repair factors. However, our understanding of a role for deSUMOylation in this process is limited. Here we identify different mechanistic roles for deSUMOylation in homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous enjoining (NHEJ) through the investigation of the deSUMOylase SENP2. We find regulated deSUMOylation of MDC1 prevents excessive SUMOylation and its RNF4-VCP mediated clearance from DSBs, thereby promoting NHEJ. In contrast we show HR is differentially sensitive to SUMO availability and SENP2 activity is needed to provide SUMO. SENP2 is amplified as part of the chromosome 3q amplification in many cancers. Increased SENP2 expression prolongs MDC1 foci retention and increases NHEJ and radioresistance. Collectively our data reveal that deSUMOylation differentially primes cells for responding to DSBs and demonstrates the ability of SENP2 to tune DSB repair responses.

scholarly journals Multifunctional properties of Nej1XLF C-terminus promote end-joining and impact DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Mojumdar ◽  
Nancy Adam ◽  
Jennifer A Cobb
Keyword(s):  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
End Joining ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Canonical Pathways ◽  
Pathway Choice ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
End Resection

A DNA double strand break (DSB) is primarily repaired by one of two canonical pathways, non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). NHEJ requires no or minimal end processing for ligation, whereas HR requires 5 end resection followed by a search for homology. The main event that determines the mode of repair is the initiation of 5 resection because if resection starts, then NHEJ cannot occur. Nej1 is a canonical NHEJ factor that functions at the cross-roads of repair pathway choice and prior to its function in stimulating Dnl4 ligase. Nej1 competes with Dna2, inhibiting its recruitment to DSBs and thereby inhibiting resection. The highly conserved C-terminal region (CTR) of Nej1 (330- 338) is important for two events that drive NHEJ, stimulating ligation and inhibiting resection, but it is dispensable for end-bridging. By combining nej1 point mutants with nuclease-dead dna2-1, we find that Nej1-F335 is essential for end-joining whereas V338 promotes NHEJ indirectly through inhibiting Dna2-mediated resection.

scholarly journals PDTM-41. INHIBITION OF DNA DOUBLE STRAND BREAK REPAIR PATHWAYS AS A PROMISING THERAPEUTIC TARGET IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMAS (DIPGs)

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi196-vi196
Author(s):  
Sharmistha Pal ◽  
Jie Bian ◽  
Brendan Price ◽  
Dipanjan Chowdhury ◽  
Daphne Haas-Kogan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Gliomas ◽  
Pathway Inhibition

Abstract New approaches to the treatment of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) are desperately needed. DNA damage response is essential for cells to maintain genome integrity as DNA is damaged by both endogenous and exogenous stressors. Many cancer cells exhibit hyper-dependency on specific DNA repair pathways due to either defects in DNA repair mechanisms and/or high levels of endogenous stress leading to accumulation of DNA damage lesions. Identification of DIPG-specific DNA repair deficiencies and resultant dependencies may establish novel therapeutic strategies for DIPGs. METHODS To identify pathways critical for DIPG cell survival, genome wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen was performed on patient derived DIPG cell lines followed by gene set enrichment analyses. To monitor the effects of pathway inhibition on survival, apoptosis, DNA damage and repair, assays were performed to measure cell proliferation, cleaved-caspase3, gamma-H2AX and reporter based-DNA repair efficiency. RESULTS Our unbiased CRISPR approach to uncover vulnerabilities in DIPGs identified DNA double strand break (DSBs) repair pathways as essential for DIPG cell proliferation and survival. Further studies revealed high basal DSBs in DIPG cells compared to neural stem cells and primary astrocytes that suggest dependence of DIPG cell survival on specific DSB repair pathways. We confirmed the intrinsic reliance of DIPG cells on the specific DSB repair pathway of mutagenic end-joining, and defined a key role for DNA repair in suppressing endogenous DNA damage-induced apoptotic cell death. CONCLUSION DIPG cells have high endogenous DNA damage levels and escape catastrophic genomic instability and cell death by engaging DNA repair pathways, in particular the mutagenic end-joining DNA repair pathway. Inhibition of this specific DNA repair pathway represents a promising new avenue for the treatment of DIPGs.

Arabidopsis DNA double-strand break repair pathways

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 964-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.E. West ◽  
W.M. Waterworth ◽  
P.A. Sunderland ◽  
C.M. Bray
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Transcript Profiles

DSBs (double-strand breaks) are one of the most serious forms of DNA damage that can occur in a cell's genome. DNA replication in cells containing DSBs, or following incorrect repair, may result in the loss of large amounts of genetic material, aneuploid daughter cells and cell death. There are two major pathways for DSB repair: HR (homologous recombination) uses an intact copy of the damaged region as a template for repair, whereas NHEJ (non-homologous end-joining) rejoins DNA ends independently of DNA sequence. In most plants, NHEJ is the predominant DSB repair pathway. Previously, the Arabidopsis NHEJ mutant atku80 was isolated and found to display hypersensitivity to bleomycin, a drug that causes DSBs in DNA. In the present study, the transcript profiles of wild-type and atku80 mutant plants grown in the presence and absence of bleomycin are determined by microarray analysis. Several genes displayed very strong transcriptional induction specifically in response to DNA damage, including the characterized DSB repair genes AtRAD51 and AtBRCA1. These results identify novel candidate genes that encode components of the DSB repair pathways active in NHEJ mutant plants.

scholarly journals Regulatory and Functional Involvement of Long Non-Coding RNAs in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Mechanisms

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1506
Author(s):  
Angelos Papaspyropoulos ◽  
Nefeli Lagopati ◽  
Ioanna Mourkioti ◽  
Andriani Angelopoulou ◽  
Spyridon Kyriazis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Non Coding Rnas ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Living Organisms

Protection of genome integrity is vital for all living organisms, particularly when DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) occur. Eukaryotes have developed two main pathways, namely Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ) and Homologous Recombination (HR), to repair DSBs. While most of the current research is focused on the role of key protein players in the functional regulation of DSB repair pathways, accumulating evidence has uncovered a novel class of regulating factors termed non-coding RNAs. Non-coding RNAs have been found to hold a pivotal role in the activation of DSB repair mechanisms, thereby safeguarding genomic stability. In particular, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have begun to emerge as new players with vast therapeutic potential. This review summarizes important advances in the field of lncRNAs, including characterization of recently identified lncRNAs, and their implication in DSB repair pathways in the context of tumorigenesis.

Double strand break (DSB) repair pathways in plants and their application in genome engineering

2021 ◽  
pp. 27-62
Author(s):  
Natalja Beying ◽  
◽  
Carla Schmidt ◽  
Holger Puchta ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Engineering ◽  
Plant Cells ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

In genome engineering, after targeted induction of double strand breaks (DSBs) researchers take advantage of the organisms’ own repair mechanisms to induce different kinds of sequence changes into the genome. Therefore, understanding of the underlying mechanisms is essential. This chapter will review in detail the two main pathways of DSB repair in plant cells, non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) and sum up what we have learned over the last decades about them. We summarize the different models that have been proposed and set these into relation with the molecular outcomes of different classes of DSB repair. Moreover, we describe the factors that have been identified to be involved in these pathways. Applying this knowledge of DSB repair should help us to improve the efficiency of different types of genome engineering in plants.

scholarly journals RAD-51-Dependent and -Independent Roles of a Caenorhabditis elegans BRCA2-Related Protein during DNA Double-Strand Break Repair

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 3127-3139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie S. Martin ◽  
Nicole Winkelmann ◽  
Mark I. R. Petalcorin ◽  
Michael J. McIlwraith ◽  
Simon J. Boulton
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Related Protein ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Phenotypic Differences ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Radiation Induced

ABSTRACT The BRCA2 tumor suppressor is implicated in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination (HR), where it regulates the RAD51 recombinase. We describe a BRCA2-related protein of Caenorhabditis elegans (CeBRC-2) that interacts directly with RAD-51 via a single BRC motif and that binds preferentially to single-stranded DNA through an oligonucleotide-oligosaccharide binding fold. Cebrc-2 mutants fail to repair meiotic or radiation-induced DSBs by HR due to inefficient RAD-51 nuclear localization and a failure to target RAD-51 to sites of DSBs. Genetic and cytological comparisons of Cebrc-2 and rad-51 mutants revealed fundamental phenotypic differences that suggest a role for Cebrc-2 in promoting the use of an alternative repair pathway in the absence of rad-51 and independent of nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). Unlike rad-51 mutants, Cebrc-2 mutants also accumulate RPA-1 at DSBs, and abnormal chromosome aggregates that arise during the meiotic prophase can be rescued by blocking the NHEJ pathway. CeBRC-2 also forms foci in response to DNA damage and can do so independently of rad-51. Thus, CeBRC-2 not only regulates RAD-51 during HR but can also function independently of rad-51 in DSB repair processes.

scholarly journals Nucleosome disassembly during human non-homologous end joining followed by concerted HIRA- and CAF-1-dependent reassembly

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan Li ◽  
Jessica K Tyler
Keyword(s):  
Strand Break ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Efficient Removal ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Nucleosome Disassembly ◽  
End Resection ◽  
Assembly Pathways

The cell achieves DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in the context of chromatin structure. However, the mechanisms used to expose DSBs to the repair machinery and to restore the chromatin organization after repair remain elusive. Here we show that induction of a DSB in human cells causes local nucleosome disassembly, apparently independently from DNA end resection. This efficient removal of histone H3 from the genome during non-homologous end joining was promoted by both ATM and the ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeler INO80. Chromatin reassembly during DSB repair was dependent on the HIRA histone chaperone that is specific to the replication-independent histone variant H3.3 and on CAF-1 that is specific to the replication-dependent canonical histones H3.1/H3.2. Our data suggest that the epigenetic information is re-established after DSB repair by the concerted and interdependent action of replication-independent and replication-dependent chromatin assembly pathways.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document